Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Review: femoral tunnel placement for PCL reconstruction in relation to the PCL fibre bundle attachments

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Accurate placement of the femoral tunnel position is an important aspect of cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. However, a wide range of positions have been described in the literature for the femoral tunnels for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, and there is no consensus regarding the optimal placement. It was hypothesised that some of the prior studies used femoral PCL graft tunnels that were outside of the anatomical attachments. A systematic review and descriptive anatomical study in vitro were undertaken. Fifty articles that described PCL reconstruction since 1917 were reviewed; the description of the femoral tunnel placement was reproducible from only 20 of these. A right, distal femur was disarticulated and the PCL attachment was dissected; the centres of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles were marked and confirmed to be close to the mean published data. The tunnel positions described in the 20 papers were also marked. The descriptions of 15 of the 20 anterolateral and 4 of the 5 posteromedial bundle tunnel centres were close (within ±2 mm deep and ±01:00 o’clock) to the anatomical centres of the bundle attachments. Other tunnels were placed either deeper or shallower than the anatomical attachments. The mean positions were: 7 mm from the articular cartilage at 1 o’clock for the anterolateral bundle, and 8 mm from the cartilage at 3 o’clock for the posteromedial bundle, in a right knee. It was concluded that it was not possible to replicate the tunnel positions used in most of the literature because of inadequate descriptions. Most of the usable descriptions of the anterolateral bundle position were close to the anatomical centre, but some tunnels were placed non-anatomically. A reproducible system for description of the femoral tunnel positions should be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Lazzara D (2002) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the quadriceps tendon in chronic injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:266–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn JH, Chung YS, Oh I (2003) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the posterior trans-septal portal. Arthrosc 19:101–107

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amis AA, Beynnon B, Blankevoort L, Chambat P, Christel P, Durselen L, Friederich N, Grood E, Hertel P, Jakob R et al (1994) Proceedings of the ESSKA scientific workshop on reconstruction of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2:124–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH, Chou SW (2004) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft: minimal 3 years follow-up. Am J Sports Med 32:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Christel P (2003) Basic principles for surgical reconstruction of the PCL in chronic posterior knee instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:289–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clancy WG, Shelbourne KD, Zoellner GB, Keene JS, Reider B, Rosenberg TD (1983) Treatment of knee joint instability secondary to rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament. Report of a new procedure. J Bone Jt Surg [Am] 65:310–322

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper DE, Stewart D (2004) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 32:346–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Edwards A, Bull AMJ, Amis AA (2007) The attachments of the fiber bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthrosc 23:284–290

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garofalo R, Jolles BM, Moretti B, Siegrist O (2006) Double-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a tendon-patellar bone-semitendinosus tendon autograft: clinical results with a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Arthrosc 22:1331–1338

    Google Scholar 

  10. Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Al Monajem ARS (1975) The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint: anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clinical Orthop Rel Res 106:216–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grood ES, Hefzy MS, Lindenfield TN (1989) Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part I: the posterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 17:197–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupte CM, Smith A, McDermott ID, Bull AMJ, Amis AA (2002) Meniscofemoral ligaments revisited. Anatomical study, age correlation and clinical implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84-B:846–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Harner CD, Xerogeanes JW, Livesay GA, Carlin GJ, Smith BA, Kusayama T, Kashiwaguchi S, Woo SL (1995) The human posterior cruciate ligament complex: an interdisciplinary study. Ligament morphology and biomechanical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 23:736–745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harner CD, Baek GH, Vogrin TM, Carlin GJ, Kashiwaguchi S, Woo SL (1999) Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. Arthrosc 15:741–749

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harner CD, Janaushek MA, Kanamori A, Yagi M, Vogrin TM, Woo SL (2000) Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 28:144–151

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hatayama K, Higuchi H, Kimura M, Kobayashi Y, Asagumo H, Takagishi K (2006) A comparison of arthroscopic single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: review of 20 cases. Am J Orthop 35:568–571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Horwitz MT (1938) An investigation of the surgical anatomy of the ligaments of the knee joint. Surg Obstet Gynecol 57:287–292

    Google Scholar 

  18. In Y, Bahk WJ, Kwon OS (2004) Cross-pin femoral fixation for hamstring posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc 20:e29–e33

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jung YB, Tae SK, Jung HJ, Lee KH (2004) Replacement of the torn posterior cruciate ligament with a mid-third patellar tendon graft with use of a modified tibial inlay method. J Bone Jt Surg [Am] 86-A:1878–1883

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim SJ, Kim HK, Kim HJ (1999) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a one-incision technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 359:156–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim SJ, Shin ST, Kim HK, Jahng JS, Kim JS (2000) Comparison of 1- and 2-incision posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthrosc 16:268–278

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim SJ, Park IS, Cheon YM, Ryu SW (2004) Double-bundle technique: endoscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using tibialis posterior allograft. Arthrosc 20:1090–1094

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lill H, Glasmacher S, Korner J, Rose T, Verheyden P, Josten C (2001) Arthroscopic-assisted simultaneous reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament and the lateral collateral ligament using hamstrings and absorbable screws. Arthrosc 17:892–897

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mannor DA, Shearn JT, Grood ES, Noyes FR, Levy MS (2000) Two-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. An in vitro analysis of graft placement and tension. Am J Sports Med 28:833–845

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mariani PP, Becker R, Rihn J, Margheritini F (2003) Surgical treatment of posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner injuries. An anatomical, biomechanical and clinical review. Knee 10:311–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mejia EA, Noyes FR, Grood ES (2002) Posterior cruciate ligament femoral insertion site characteristics. Importance for reconstructive procedures. Am J Sports Med 30:643–651

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM (1997) The anatomic origin of the posterior cruciate ligament: where is it? reference landmarks for PCL reconstruction. Arthrosc 13:325–331

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Noyes FR, Medvecky MJ, Bhargava M (2003) Arthroscopically assisted quadriceps double-bundle tibial inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an analysis of techniques and a safe operative approach to the popliteal fossa. Arthrosc 19:894–905

    Google Scholar 

  29. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (2005) Posterior cruciate ligament replacement with a two-strand quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft and a tibial inlay technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 87:1241–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nyland J, Hester P, Caborn DN (2002) Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft tissue: 2-year postoperative outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:274–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pinczewski LA, Thuresson P, Otto D, Nyquist F (1997) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using four-strand hamstring tendon graft and interference screws. Arthrosc 13:661–665

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Race A, Amis AA (1994) The mechanical properties of the two bundles of the human posterior cruciate ligament. J Biomech 27:13–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Race A, Amis AA (1998) PCL reconstruction. In vitro biomechanical comparison of ‘isometric’ versus single and double-bundled ‘anatomic’ grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:173–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sidles JA, Larson RV, Garbini JL, Downey DJ, Matsen FA 3rd (1988) Ligament length relationships in the moving knee. J Orthop Res 6:593–610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Stahelin AC, Sudkamp NP, Weiler A (2001) Anatomic double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Arthrosc 17:188–197

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang CJ, Chen HS, Huang TW (2003) Outcome of arthroscopic single bundle reconstruction for complete posterior cruciate ligament tear. Injury 34:747–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang CJ, Weng LH, Hsu CC, Chan YS (2004) Arthroscopic single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using hamstring autograft. Injury 35:1293–1299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang CJ, Weng LH, Yuan LJ, Chen HS (2004) Comparison of autogenous and allogenous posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions of the knee. Injury 35:1279–1285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zavras TD, Amis AA (1998) Method for visualising and measuring the position of the femoral attachment of the ACL and ACL grafts in experimental work. J Biomech 31:387–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The specimen used in this study was sourced from the International Institute for the Advancement of Medicine, Jessop, PA, USA. Mr. Apsingi received financial support for the purchase of knee specimens from Smith & Nephew Arthroscopy (UK) Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK

    Sunil Apsingi

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Newcastle University Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Sunil Apsingi & David J. Deehan

  3. Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Anthony M. J. Bull

  4. Departments of Mechanical Engineering and of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK

    Andrew A. Amis

Authors
  1. Sunil Apsingi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anthony M. J. Bull
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David J. Deehan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrew A. Amis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew A. Amis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Apsingi, S., Bull, A.M.J., Deehan, D.J. et al. Review: femoral tunnel placement for PCL reconstruction in relation to the PCL fibre bundle attachments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17, 652–659 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0747-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0747-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation