Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Accuracy of implant positioning and reconstruction of the mechanical leg axis are major requirements for achieving good long-term results in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the present study was to determine whether image-free computer navigation technology has the potential to improve the accuracy of component alignment in TKA cohorts of experienced surgeons immediately and constantly. One hundred patients with primary arthritis of the knee underwent the unilateral total knee arthroplasty. The cohort of 50 TKAs implanted with conventional instrumentation was directly followed by the cohort of the very first 50 computer-assisted TKAs. All surgeries were performed by two senior surgeons. All patients received the Zimmer NexGen™ total knee prosthesis (Zimmer Inc., Warsaw, IN, USA). There was no variability regarding surgeons or surgical technique, except for the use of the navigation system (StealthStation® Treon plus®, Medtronic Inc., Minnesota, MI, USA). Accuracy of implant positioning was measured on postoperative long-leg standing radiographs and standard lateral X-rays with regard to the valgus angle and the coronal and sagittal component angles. In addition, preoperative deformities of the mechanical leg axis, tourniquet time, age, and gender were correlated. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software package. Independent t-tests were used, with significance set at P < 0.05 (two-tailed) to compare differences in mean angular values and frontal mechanical alignment between the two cohorts. To compute the rate of optimally implanted prostheses between the two groups we used the χ2 test. The average postoperative radiological frontal mechanical alignment was 1.88° of varus (range 6.1° of valgus–10.1° of varus; SD 3.68°) in the conventional cohort and 0.28° of varus (range 3.7°–6.0° of varus; SD 1.97°) in the navigated cohort. Including all criteria for optimal implant alignment, 16 cases (32%) in the conventional cohort and 31 cases (62%) in the navigated cohort have been implanted optimally. The average difference in tourniquet time was modest with additional 12.9 min in the navigated cohort compared to the conventional cohort. Our findings suggest that the experienced knee surgeons can improve immediately and constantly the accuracy of component orientation using an image-free computer-assisted navigation system in TKA. The computer-assisted technology has shown to be easy to use, safe, and efficient in routine knee replacement surgery. We believe that navigation is a key technology for various current and future surgical alignment topics and minimal-invasive lower limb surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bach CM, Steingruber IE, Peer S, Nogler M, Wimmer C, Ogon M (2001) Radiographic assessment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 385:144–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bathis H, Perlick L, Luring C, Kalteis T, Grifka J (2003) CT-based and CT-free navigation in knee prosthesis implantation. Results of a prospective study. Unfallchirurg 106(11):935–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berry DJ (2004) Computerassisted knee arthroplasty is better than a conventional jig-based technique in terms of component alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2573

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown GA, Firoozbakhsh K, DeCoster TA, Reyna JR Jr, Moneim M (2003) Rapid prototyping: the future of trauma surgery? J Bone Joint Surg 85(Suppl 4):49–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolognesi M, Hofmann A (2005) Computer navigation versus standard instrumentation for TKA: a single-surgeon experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:162–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Caillouette JT, Anzel SH (1990) Fat embolism syndrome following the intramedullary alignment guide in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 251:198–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ (2004) Computerassisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:372–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP (2005) Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty 20(3):282–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F (1998) Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 345:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dennis DA, Channer M, Susmann MH, Stringer EA (1993) Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ecker ML, Lotke PA, Windsor RE, Cella JP (1988) Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Significance of radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop Rel Res 216:151–8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fortheine F, Ohnsorge JAK, Schkommodau E, Radermacher K (2004) CT-based planning and individual template navigation in TKA. In: Stiehl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG Navigation and robotics in total joint and spine surgery. Springer, Berlin, pp 336–42

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A (2005) Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (433):152–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hafez MA, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB, Sherman KP (2006) Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 444:184–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ischii Y, Ohmori G, Bechthold J, Gustilo RB (1995) Extramedullary versus intramedullary alignment guides in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 318:167–75

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:709–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jenny JY, Clemens U, Kohler S, Kiefer H, Konermann W, Miehlke RK (2005) Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. J Arthroplasty 20(7):832–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kalairajah Y, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Ludbrook GG, Spriggins AJ (2006) Are systemic emboli reduced in computerassisted knee surgery? A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88-B:198–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kolettis GT, Wixson RL, Peruzzi WT, Blake MJ, Wardell S, Stuhlberg SD (1994) Safety of 1-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:102–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Laskin RS (2001) The genesis total knee prosthesis: a 10-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res (388):95–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Loer I, Plitz W (2003) Tibial malalignment of mobile-bearing prostheses: a simulator study. Orthopade 32:296–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Maestro A, Harwin SF, Sandoval MG, Vaquero DH, Murcia A (1998) Influence of intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment guides on final total knee arthroplasty component position: a radiographic analysis. J Arthroplasty 13:552–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mahaluxmivala J, Bankes MJK, Nicolai P, Aldam CH, Allen PW (2001) The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 press fit condylar posterior cruciate—sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 16:635–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McGrory JE, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW, Nigbur M (2002) Preoperative hip to ankle radiographs in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:196–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mont MA, Urquhart MA, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA (1997) Intramedullary goniometer can improve alignment in knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 12(3):332–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Moreland JR (1988) Mechanics of failure of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:49–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Patel DV, Ferris BD, Aichroth PM (1991) Radiological study of alignment after total knee replacement. Short radiographs or long radiographs?. Int Orthop 15:209–10

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Perlick L, Bathis H, Lerch K, Luring C, Tingart M, Grifka J (2005) Revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of postoperative leg alignment after computer-assisted implantation versus the conventional technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(3):167–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Petersen TL, Engh GA (1988) Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3:67–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ranawat CS, Boachie-Adjei O (1988) Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:6–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rand JA, Coventry MB (1988) Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 232:168–73

    Google Scholar 

  32. Reed SC, Gollish J (1997) The accuracy of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12:677–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 153–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS (2001) Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res (388):10–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ryd L, Lindtsrand A, Stentstrom A, Selvik G (1990) Porous coated anatomic tricompartmental tibial components. The relationship between position and micromotion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 251:189–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Siu D, Cooke TD, Broekhiven LD, Lam M, Fisher B, Saunders G, Challis TW (1991) A standardized technique for lower limb radiography. Practice, applications, and error analysis. Invest Radiol 26:71–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85-B:830–5

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V (2002) Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90–8

    Google Scholar 

  39. Swanson KE, Stocks GW, Warren PD, Hazel MR, Janssen HF (2000) Does axial limb rotation affect the alignment measurements in deformed limbs?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:246–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell CW Jr (1995) Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 5 321:106–10

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tew M, Waugh W (1985) Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67B:551–6

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vince KG, Insall JN, Kelly MA (1989) The total condylar prosthesis. Ten- to twelve-year results of a cemented knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 793–7

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wright JG, Treble N, Feinstein AR (1993) Measurement of lower limb alignment using long radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:164–5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Gudrun Rosenberger, MD from the Psychiatry Neuroimaging Lab, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, for her assistance in statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Trauma Surgery and Sports Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria

    Ralf E. Rosenberger, Christian Hoser, Sebastian Quirbach, Rene Attal, Alfred Hennerbichler & Christian Fink

Authors
  1. Ralf E. Rosenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Hoser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sebastian Quirbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rene Attal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alfred Hennerbichler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christian Fink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf E. Rosenberger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenberger, R.E., Hoser, C., Quirbach, S. et al. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthr 16, 249–257 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-007-0420-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-007-0420-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation