Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of graft tensioning in anatomic 2-bundle ACL reconstruction on knee joint kinematics

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Recently, double bundle ACL reconstruction, in which the two bundles thought to have different effects on knee kinematics are reconstructed separately, is widely believed to more favorably restore normal knee kinematics than conventional single bundle ACL reconstruction. However, rotational kinematics during physiological movement after double bundle reconstruction has rarely been tested. The purpose of this study was to measure the kinematics of the ACL deficient and reconstructed knees using two different tensioning conditions in double bundle reconstruction, and to examine the effects of each graft on knee kinematics. Six cadaveric knees were used. Six degrees-of-freedom of knee kinematics and the tension of each graft were monitored during simulated knee extension with the ACL intact, resected, and reconstructed under two different tensioning conditions: 50 N on anteromedial bundle and 0 N on posterolateral bundle (AM-favored condition); 0 N on anteromedial bundle and 50 N on posterolateral bundle (PL-favored condition). Tibial translation: After ACL reconstruction, the tibia overcorrected posteriorly in both conditions. Such an overcorrection in the AM-favored condition was larger than in the PL-favored condition. Tibial rotation: The tibia was significantly externally rotated after ACL reconstruction at a low flexion angle in both conditions. However, at a high flexion angle, tibial external rotation was shown only in the AM-favored condition. Graft tension: While total tensions were similar between the two conditions, the AM bundle shared more tension in the AM-favored condition than in the PL-favored condition. A total of 50 N of tension force was assumed to be excessive for normalizing knee kinematics at a low flexion angle even if double bundle reconstruction was used. Additionally, the AM-favored tensioning reconstruction made the tibia rotate externally and translate posteriorly even at a high flexion angle. Further research is needed to normalize knee kinematics after ACL reconstruction, however it is recommended that a moderate tensioning force is applied to the PL bundle and a minimal tensioning force to the AM bundle in double bundle reconstruction to obtain better knee kinematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amis AA, Jacob RP (1998) Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:S2–S12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen HN, Dyhre-Poulsen P (1997) The anterior cruciate ligament does play a role in controlling axial rotation in the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:145–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold MP, Verdonschot N, Kampen A (2005) The normal anterior cruciate ligament as a model for tensioning strategies in anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Am J Sports Med 33:277–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brandsson S, Karlsson J, Swärd L, Kartus J, Eriksson BI, Kärrholm J (2002) Kinematics and laxity of the knee joint after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Pre–and postoperative rediostereometric studies. Am J Sports Med 30:361–367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bylski-Austrow DI, Grood ES, Hefzy MS, Holden JP, Butler DL (1990) Anterior cruciate ligament replacements: a mechanical study of femoral attachment location, flexion angle at tensioning, and initial tension. J Orthop Res 8:522–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Georgoulis AD, Papadonikolakis A, Papageorgiou CD, Mitsou A, Stergiou N (2003) Three-dimensional tibiofemoral kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and reconstructed knee during walking. Am J Sports Med 31:75–79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grood ES, Suntay WJ (1983) A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105:136–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirokawa S, Solomonow M, Lu Y, Lou Z (1992) Anterior-posterior and rotational displacement of the tibia elicited by quadriceps contraction. Am J Sports Med 20(3):299–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL (2003) Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 O’clock and 10 O’clock femoral tunnel placement. Arthroscopy 19:297–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mae T, Shino K, Matsumoto N, Nakata K, Nakamura N, Iwahashi T (2006) Force sharing between two grafts in the anatomical two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Jan 6:1–5 [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  11. Melby A, Noble JS, Askew MJ, Boom AA, Hurst FW (1991) The effects of graft tensioning on the laxity and kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knee. Arthroscopy 7:257–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Milne AD, Chess DG, Jhonson JA, King GJW (1996) Accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking device: a study of the optimal operating range and metal interface. J Biomech 29:791–793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nagamune K, Muratsu H, Hoshino Y, Tanaka K, Kubo S, Yagi M, Mizuno K, Kuroda R, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2004) Non-invasive real-time visualization of the 6DOF of knee kinematics during manual testing. Presented at the annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Poster No.557, Washington, DC

  14. Ristanis S, Giakas G, Papageorgiou CD, Moraiti T, Stergou N, Georgoulis AD (2003) The effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on tibial rotation during after descending stairs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:360–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tashman S, Collon D, Anderson K, Kolowich P, Anderst W (2004) Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:975–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL (2002) Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:660–666

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamamoto Y, Hsu WH, Woo SL, Van Scyoc AH, Takakura Y, Debski RE (2004) Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. a comparison of a lateral and an anatomical femoral tunnel placement. Am J Sports Med 32:1825–1832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Kitamura N, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H, Minami A (2004) Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon graft. Arthroscopy 20:1015–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoo JD, Papannagari R, Park SE, DeFrate LE, Gill TJ, Li G (2005) The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on knee joint kinematics under simulated muscle loads. Am J Sports Med 33:240–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University, Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan

    Yuichi Hoshino, Ryosuke Kuroda, Kouki Nagamune, Koji Nishimoto, Kiyonori Mizuno & Masahiro Kurosaka

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan

    Masayoshi Yagi & Shinichi Yoshiya

Authors
  1. Yuichi Hoshino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ryosuke Kuroda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kouki Nagamune
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Koji Nishimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Masayoshi Yagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kiyonori Mizuno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shinichi Yoshiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Masahiro Kurosaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuichi Hoshino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoshino, Y., Kuroda, R., Nagamune, K. et al. The effect of graft tensioning in anatomic 2-bundle ACL reconstruction on knee joint kinematics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15, 508–514 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0242-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0242-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation