Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Second-look arthroscopic findings of 208 patients after ACL reconstruction

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

The aim of this study is to report the arthroscopic subjective findings of reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with good clinical outcome. Graft used for reconstruction was either patella bone-tendon-bone (PBTB) autograft or hamstring tendon [quadrupled semitendinous and gracilis tendon (QSGT)] autograft. From March 1997 to September 2003, among 716 ACL reconstructions 209 knees (208 patients) were available for second-look arthroscopy at a mean 21.2-month (range, 14–70 months) postoperative period. The second-look arthroscopy focused on the evaluation of (1) continuity of the reconstructed ACL graft, (2) subjective graft tension using a probe, (3) the extent of synovial coverage, (4) the prevalence of cyclops or cyclops-like lesion, and (5) bony change after notchplasty. Patellar tendon autograft was used in 80 knees, hamstring tendon autograft in 129 knees. Just prior to second-look arthroscopy two objective clinical evaluations, KT-2000 arthrometer and Lysholm knee score, were performed to verify good clinical outcomes. A comparison between the hamstring tendon group and the patella tendon group, hamstring group showed slightly better results in Lysholm knee scores and KT-2000 arthrometer but there were no statistically significant differences (p>0.05). Undetected partial graft tear was seen in 21 knees (10%). With regard to graft tension, a total of 181 grafts (87%) showed normal tension and 28 (13%) showed slight lax tension. The overall synovial coverage was poor in nine (4%) knees. The synovial coverage was slightly better in the hamstring tendon group. A total of 45 knees (21.5%) showed cyclops-like lesion in variable sizes and locations. Reformation of the notch was seen in 85 knees (40%). In conclusion, the findings of second-look arthroscopy of reconstructed ACL in good clinical outcome patients showed approximately 10% partial graft tear, 5% poor synovial coverage, 20% cyclops-like lesion, and 40% some notch reformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Zaccherotti G, De Biase P (1994) Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 22:211–217; discussion 217–218

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bach BR Jr, Levy ME, Bojchuk J, Tradonsky S, Bush-Joseph CA, Khan NH (1998) Single-incision endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Minimum two-year follow-up evaluation. Am J Sports Med 26:30–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bents RT, Jones RC, May DA, Snearly WS (1998) Intercondylar notch encroachment following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study. Am J Knee Surg 11:81–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Butler DL, Grood ES, Noyes FR, Sodd AN (1985) On the interpretation of our anterior cruciate ligament data. Clin Orthop 196:26–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark R, Olsen RE, Larson BJ, Goble EM, Farrer RP (1998) Cross-pin femoral fixation: a new technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee. Arthroscopy 14:258–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Colombet P, Allard M, Bousquet V, de Lavigne C, Flurin PH, Lachaud C (2002) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using four-strand semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts and metal interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy 18:232–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooley VJ, Deffner KT, Rosenberg TD (2001) Quadrupled semitendinosus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 5-year results in patients without meniscus loss. Arthroscopy 17:795–800

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper DE, Deng XH, Burstein AL, Warren RF (1993) The strength of the central third patellar tendon graft. A biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 21:818–823; discussion 823–814

    Google Scholar 

  9. Corry IS, Webb JM, Clingeleffer AJ, Pinczewski LA (1999) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 27:444–454

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Delince P, Krallis P, Descamps PY, Fabeck L, Hardy D (1998) Different aspects of the cyclops lesion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multifactorial etiopathogenesis. Arthroscopy 14:869–876

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Holmes PF, James SL, Larson RL, Singer KM, Jones DC (1991) Retrospective direct comparison of three intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 19:596–599; discussion 599–600

    Google Scholar 

  12. Insall J, Scott W (2001) Surgery of the knee, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jackson DW, Schaefer RK (1990) Cyclops syndrome: loss of extension following intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 6:171–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Klein JP, Lintner DM, Downs D, Vavrenka K (2003) The incidence and significance of femoral tunnel widening after quadrupled hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using femoral cross pin fixation. Arthroscopy 19:470–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. L’Insalata JC, Klatt B, Fu FH, Harner CD (1997) Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:234–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nebelung W, Becker R, Merkel M, Ropke M (1998) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon using Endobutton fixation on the femoral side. Arthroscopy 14:810–815

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Noojin FK, Barrett GR, Hartzog CW, Nash CR (2000) Clinical comparison of intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons in men versus women. Am J Sports Med 28:783–789

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE (1990) Bone-patellar ligament-bone and fascia lata allografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1125–1136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Noyes FR, Butler DL, Grood ES, Zernicke RF, Hefzy MS (1984) Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:344–352

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Noyes FR, Butler DL, Paulos LE, Grood ES (1983) Intra-articular cruciate reconstruction. I: perspectives on graft strength, vascularization, and immediate motion after replacement. Clin Orthop 172:71–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Neill DB (1996) Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A prospective randomized analysis of three techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:803–813

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Otero AL, Hutcheson L (1993) A comparison of the doubled semitendinosus/gracilis and central third of the patellar tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 9:143–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rougraff BT, Shelbourne KD (1999) Early histologic appearance of human patellar tendon autografts used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:9–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rowden NJ, Sher D, Rogers GJ, Schindhelm K (1997) Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation. Initial comparison of patellar tendon and semitendinosus autografts in young fresh cadavers. Am J Sports Med 25:472–478

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Specchiulli F, Laforgia R, Mocci A, Miolla L, Scialpi L, Solarino G Jr (1995) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A comparison of 2 techniques. Clin Orthop 311:142–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Woo SL, Hollis JM, Adams DJ, Lyon RM, Takai S (1991) Tensile properties of the human femur-anterior cruciate ligament-tibia complex. The effects of specimen age and orientation. Am J Sports Med 19:217–225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamagishi T, Fujii K, Roppongi S, Hatsuumi H (1998) Blood flow measurement in reconstructed anterior cruciate ligaments using laser Doppler flowmetry. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:160–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul, 135-710, South Korea

    Jin Hwan Ahn, Jae Chul Yoo, Hyoung Seop Yang & Jae Hoon Kim

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University School of Medicine, Gojan 1-dong, Danwongu, Ansansi, 152-703, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

    Joon Ho Wang

Authors
  1. Jin Hwan Ahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jae Chul Yoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hyoung Seop Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jae Hoon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joon Ho Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae Chul Yoo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahn, J.H., Yoo, J.C., Yang, H.S. et al. Second-look arthroscopic findings of 208 patients after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15, 242–248 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0177-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0177-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation