Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability in the assessment of tendon volume and intratendinous signal of the Achilles tendon on MRI: a methodological description

  • Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

The purpose is to introduce a method for accurately and objectively evaluating volume and mean intratendinous signal within the Achilles tendon using MRI. We prospectively studied MRI from 33 patients with chronic Achilles tendinosis (20 males and 13 females) with a median age of 52 years (range 29–70). In all patients, both Achilles tendons were investigated with T1-WI as well as PD-WI MRI. Thus, 66 Achilles tendons were evaluated in the study. Tendon volume and mean intratendinous signal were evaluated using a computerized 3-D seed-growing technique. In general, the computerized 3-D seed-growing technique resulted in an excellent overall observer reliability of the MRI-measurements. The reliability (R) for tendon volume measurements was highest for the T1-WI sequence (R=97.9%). For the mean intratendinous signal, the PD-WI sequence showed the highest reliability (R=88.1%). The same pattern was present when we studied the coefficient of variation (CV). For the CV, lower figures indicate more reliable estimates. CV was 4.9% for tendon volume and 8.9% for mean intratendinous signal. In conclusion, it could be said that a computerized 3-D seed-growing technique to monitor and evaluate the volume of the Achilles tendon and mean intratendinous signal, using MRI, shows an overall excellent reliability regarding inter- as well as intra-observer reliability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alfredson H (2003) Chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy: an update on research and treatment. Clin Sports Med 22(4):727–741

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Åström M, Gentz CF, Nilsson P, et al (1996) Imaging in chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a comparison of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings in 27 histologically verified cases. Skelet Radiol 25:615–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fahlström M, Jonsson P, Lorentzon R, Alfredson H (2001) Chronic Achilles tendon pain treated with eccentric calf muscle training. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11(5):327–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fleiss JF (1986) The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, New York, p 7

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kader D, Saxena A, Movin T, Maffulli N (2002) Achilles tendinopathy: some aspects of basic science and clinical management. Br J Sports Med 36(4):239–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Karjalainen PT, Aronen HJ, Pihlajamaki HK, Soila K, Paavonen T, Bostman OM (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging during healing of surgically repaired Achilles tendon ruptures. Am J Sports Med 25:164–171

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maffulli N, Regine R, Angelillo M, Capasso G, Filice S (1987) Ultrasound diagnosis of Achilles tendon pathology in runners. Br J Sports Med 21(4):158–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Möller M, Movin T, Granhed H, Lind K, Faxèn E, Karlsson J (2001) Acute rupture of tendon Achillis. A prospective randomised study of comparison between surgical and non-surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(6):843–848

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Movin T, Kristoffersen-Wiberg M, Shalabi A, Gad A, Aspelin P, Rolf C (1998) Intratendinous alterations as imaged by ultrasound and contrast medium-enhanced magnetic resonance in chronic achillodynia. Foot Ankle Int 19:311–317

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Neuhold A, Stiskal M, Kainberger F, Schwaighofer B (1992) Degenerative Achilles tendon disease: assessment by magnetic resonance and ultrasonography. Eur J Radiol 14(3):213–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rolf C, Movin T (1997) Etiology, histopathology, and outcome of surgery in achillodynia. Foot Ankle Int 18 (9):565–569

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shalabi A, Kristoffersen-Wiberg M, Aspelin P, Movin T (2001) MR evaluation of chronic Achilles tendinosis. A longitudinal study of 15 patients preoperatively and two years postoperatively. Acta Radiol 42:269–276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shalabi A, Kristoffersen-Wiberg M, Aspelin P, Papadogiannakis N and Movin T (2002) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and histopathology in chronic Achilles tendinosis. A longitudinal MR study of 15 patients. Acta Radiol 43:198–206

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Streiner DL, Norman GR (1989) Health measurement scales. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 83–85

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adel Shalabi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shalabi, A., Movin, T., Kristoffersen-Wiberg, M. et al. Reliability in the assessment of tendon volume and intratendinous signal of the Achilles tendon on MRI: a methodological description. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13, 492–498 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-004-0546-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-004-0546-0

Keywords

Navigation