Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of harvesting the hamstrings tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the morphology and movement of the hamstrings muscle: a novel MRI technique

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

This study evaluated intramuscular movement of hamstrings muscle after reconstruction of the ACL with a hamstrings tendon graft. The movement of the muscles during knee flexion was measured using a novel MRI technique called the "tagging snapshot" technique, which labels multiple tagging bands within the musculature. Eleven patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons were studied. The difference in the maximum active knee flexion angle between the ACL-reconstructed and the intact knee was calculated as knee flexion lag. Knee flexion strength was measured in 8 of the 11 patients. The semitendinosus muscle of the ACL-reconstructed knee exhibited three different morphological patterns; group I, similar shape to the intact knee with distal tendonlike structures; group II, smaller proximally than the intact knee with distal tendonlike structures; and group III, considerably smaller proximally than the intact knee without distal tendonlike structures. Each group was associated with a different knee flexion lag and different knee flexion strength. Our results indicated that the effect of hamstrings tendon harvest on knee function is not uniform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cross MJ, Roger G, Anderson IF (1992) Regeneration of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons following their transection for repair of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 20:221–223

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eriksson K, Larsson H, Wredmark T, et al (1999) Semitendinosus tendon regeneration after harvesting for ACL reconstruction. A prospective MRI study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:220–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eriksson K, Hamberg P, Jansson E, et al (2001) Semitendinosus muscle in anterior cruciate ligament surgery: morphology and function. Arthroscopy 17:808–817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferretti A, Conteduca F, Morelli F, et al (2002) Regeneration of the semitendinosus tendon after its use in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A histologic study of three cases. Am J Sports Med 30:204–207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fukubayashi T. Ikeda K, Niitsu M (1994) Changes in muscle volume after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendons (in Japanese). Hiza 20:124–127

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gomes T, Ratzlaff C, McConky JP, et al (1990) Semitendinosus repair augmentation of acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Can J Sports Sci 15:137–142

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hioki S, Fukubayashi T, Ikeda K, et al (1995) In vivo intramusclarmovement of quadriceps femoris with tagged MRI. TORS 20:607

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hioki S, Fukubayashi T, Ikeda K, et al (1997) Intramuscular movement of quadriceps femoris and hamstrings during knee active extension and flexion with tagged MRI (in Japanese). Nippon Rinsho Baiomekanikus Gakkaishi18:363–366

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liscomb AB, Johnston RK, Snyder RB, et al (1982) Evaluation of hamstring strength following use of semitendinosus and gracilis tendons to reconstruct the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 10:340–342

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakamura N, Horibe S, Sasaki S, et al (2002) Evaluation of active knee flexion and hamstring strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 18:598–602

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Niitsu M, Campeau NG, Holsinger-Bampton AE, et al (1992) Tracking motion with tagged rapid gradient-echo magnetization-prepared MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2:155–163

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohkoshi Y, Inoue C, Yamane S, et al (1998) Changes in muscle strength properties caused by harvesting of autogenous semitendinosus tendon for reconstruction of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 14:580–584

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Papandrea P, Vulpiani MC, Ferretti A, et al (2000) Regeneration of the semitendinosus tendon harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Evaluation using ultrasonography. Am J Sports Med 28:556–561

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rispoli DM, Sanders TG, Miller MD, et al (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging at different time periods following hamstring harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 17:2–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Simonian PT, Harrison SD, Cooley VJ, et al (1997) Assessment of morbidity of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon harvest for ACL reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg 10:54–59

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zarins B, Rowe CR (1986) Combined anterior cruciate-ligament reconstrucion using semitendinosus tendon and iliotibial tract. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:160–177

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Japanese Sports Medicine Research Foundation is acknowledged. No author or related institution has received any financial benefit form research in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigeru Hioki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hioki, S., Fukubayashi, T., Ikeda, K. et al. Effect of harvesting the hamstrings tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the morphology and movement of the hamstrings muscle: a novel MRI technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11, 223–227 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0361-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0361-z

Keywords

Navigation