Skip to main content
Log in

Failure strength of bioabsorbable interference screws: effects of in vivo degradation for 12 weeks

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

We investigated the effect of in vivo degradation for 6–12 weeks on the fixation strength of polylactide bioabsorbable interference screws. Ten bioabsorbable interference screws were used to fix the patellar tendon autograft in ten live sheep knees, which were equally divided into two groups and killed in the 6th or 12th week. The control group consisted of four cadaveric knees. Following the killing of the animals the screws were retrieved and reused to fix patellar tendon grafts in cadaveric sheep knees. Tendon pull-out tests were performed for the partially degraded screws, for the control group, and for the reused screws of the control group. Macroscopic and microscopic examinations of the 6- and 12-week specimens were performed. Tendons pulled-out with an average force of 357±30 N in the cadaveric control group on the first use and with 465±118 N on the second use. The partially degraded screws failed with a mean load of 399±119 N in the 6-week group, and 12-week screws at 447±72 N. No macroscopic sign of degradation was observed on the retrieved screws. Histological examination of the 6 week specimens showed necrotic changes in the tendon around screw contact areas. Healing with granulation tissue was present in the same area in the 12th week. Foreign body reaction or an excessive inflammatory reaction was not observed. In vivo degradation of poly-l-lactide interference screws for 12 weeks thus causes neither a loss in the fixation strength of the screws nor an obvious inflammatory reaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abate JA, Fadale PD, Hulstyn MJ, Walsh WR (1998) Initial fixation strength of polylactic acid interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 14:278–284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barber FA (1999) Tripled semitendinosus-cancellous bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with BioScrew fixation. Arthroscopy 15:360–367

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Benedetto KP, Fellinger M, Lim TE, Passler JM, Schoen JL, Willems WJ (2000) A new bioabsorbable interference screw: preliminary results of a prospective, multicenter, randomised clinical trial. Arthroscopy 16:41–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blasier RD, Bucholz R, Cole W, Johnson LL, Mäkelä EA (1997) Bioresorbable implants: applications in orthopaedic surgery. Instr Course Lect 46:531–546

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blickenstaff KR, Grana WA, Egle D (1997) Analysis of a semitendinosus autograft in a rabbit model. Am J Sports Med 25:554–559

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Caborn DNM, Urban WP, Johnson DL, Nyland J, Pienkowski D (1997) Biomechanical comparison between BioScrew and titanium alloy interference screws for bone-patellar tendon-bone graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 13:229–232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Caborn DNM, Coen M, Neef R, Hamilton D, Nyland J, Johnson DL (1998) Quadrupled semitendinosus-gracilis autograft fixation in the femoral tunnel: a comparison between a metal and a bioabsorbable interference screw. Arthroscopy 14:241–245

    Google Scholar 

  8. Demirhan M, Kilicoglu O, Akpinar S, Akman S, Atalar AC, Goksan MA (2000) Time-dependent reduction in load to failure of wedge-type polyglyconate suture anchors. Arthroscopy 16:383–390

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fink C, Benedetto KP, Hackl W, Hoser C, Freund MC, Rieger M (2000) Bioabsorbable polyglyconate interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective computed tomography-controlled study. Arthroscopy 16:491–498

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson LL, vanDyk GE (1996) Metal and biodegradable interference screws: comparison of failure strength. Arthroscopy 12:452–456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Andrish JT (1987) A biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 15:225–229

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lajtai G, Humer K, Aitzetmuller G, Unger F, Noszian I, Orthner E (1999) Serial magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of a bioabsorbable interference screw and the adjacent bone. Arthroscopy 15:481–488

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mainil-Varlet P, Cordey J, Gogolewski S (1997) Positional stability of polylactide pins with various surface texture in the sheep tibia. J Biomed Mater Res 34:351–359

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marti C, Imhoff AB, Bahrs C, Romero J (1997) Metallic versus bioabsorbable interference screw for fixation of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:217–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Martinek V, Friederich NF (1999) Tibial and pretibial cyst formation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy 15:317–320

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McFarland EG, Morrey BF, An KN, Wood MB (1986) The relationship of vascularity and water content to tensile strength in a patellar tendon replacement of the anterior cruciate in dogs. Am J Sports Med 14:436–448

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McGuire DA, Barber FA, Elrod BF, Paulos LE (1999) Bioabsorbable interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 15:463–473

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pena F, Grøntvedt T, Brown GA, Aune AK, Engebretsen L (1996) Comparison of failure strength between metallic and absorbable interference screws. Am J Sports Med 24:329–334

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rupp S, Krauss PW, Fritsch EW (1997) Fixation strength of a biodegradable interference screw and a press-fit technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a BPTB graft. Arthroscopy 13:61–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stähelin AC, Weiler A, Rüfenacht H, Hoffmann R, Geissmann A, Feinstein R (1997) Clinical degradation and biocompatibility of different bioabsorbable interference screws: a report of six cases. Arthroscopy 13:238–244

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Walton M (1999) Absorbable and metal interference screws: comparison of graft security during healing. Arthroscopy 15:818–826

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Warden WH, Friedman R, Teresi LM, Jackson DW (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging of bioabsorbable polylactic acid interference screws during the first 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 15:474–480

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weiler A, Reinhard FG, Hoffmann MD, Stahelin AC, Helling HJ, Südkamp NP (2000) Biodegredable implants in sports medicine: the biological base. Arthroscopy 16:305–321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Arcelik Corp. Research Laboratories (Istanbul, Turkey), for their help in performing the tension tests and Gamze Kilicoglu, MD, for her help during preparation of the manuscript. The experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed. This work was supported by the Research Fund of the University of Istanbul, project number: 1372/081299.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Onder Kilicoglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kilicoglu, O., Demirhan, M., Akman, S. et al. Failure strength of bioabsorbable interference screws: effects of in vivo degradation for 12 weeks. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11, 228–234 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0359-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-003-0359-6

Keywords

Navigation