Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fixation and distraction in creative design: the repercussions of reviewing patent documents to avoid infringement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is common to conduct a patent search when designing new products for commercial purposes. This paper examines whether reviewing patent documents to avoid infringement can affect design creativity based on an experimental study involving 106 undergraduate engineering students. As part of the study, the participants were divided into three groups and asked to individually design a water kettle in 20 min. Participants from the first group were each given an identical patent document at the start of the experiment and were warned not to infringe the patented design. Participants from the second group were each given another patent document and the same warning. Participants from the third group were not given any patent documentation. The experiment results show that reviewing patent documents prior to ideation, even when done to avoid infringement, can fixate and lead to the inclusion of design features associated with the patent documents reviewed. In addition, reviewing patent documents can also cause distractions and result in the exclusion of design features that may otherwise be included. The findings of this work can contribute towards design pedagogy and the development of processes to handle patent documents in design projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboukinane C, Moriasi DN, Kenimer AL, Dooley K, Linder J (2013) Fostering creativity in engineering education through experiential and team-based learning. In: Proceedings of the 120th ASEE annual conference & exposition, Atlanta, GA

  • Agogue M, Kazakci A, Hatchuel A, Le Masson P, Weil B, Poirel N, Cassotti M (2013) The impact of type of examples on originality: explaining fixation and stimulation effects. J Creative Behav 48(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agogue M, Poirel N, Pineau A, Houde O, Cassotti M (2014) The impact of age and training on creativity: a design-theory approach to study fixation effects. Think Skills Creativity 11(1):33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altshuller G (2002) 40 principles: TRIZ keys to technical innovation. Technical Innovation Centre, Worcester (trans and ed: Shulyak, L., Rodman, S.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM, Khaire M (2008) Creativity and the role of the leader. Harvard Bus Rev 86(10):100–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonietti A, Colombo B, Pizzingrilli P (2011) Educating creativity, guest editorial. Open Educ J 4(2):34–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arden B Jr, Debasish D, Lalit P (2015) Educate to innovate: factors that influence innovation. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillie C (2002) Enhancing creativity in engineering students. Eng Sci Educ J 11(5):185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbot B, Besancon M, Lubart TI (2011) Assessing creativity in the classroom. Open Educ J 4(2):58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boden MA (2003) The creative mind: myths and mechanisms, 2nd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd DK, Parkinson MB (2014) Two lessons from a short-duration design-build-test activity. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advanced design research and education (ICADRE14), Singapore, Singapore

  • Bremer MH, Gonzalez E, Mercado E (2010) Teaching creativity and innovation using sustainability as driving force. Int J Eng Educ 26(2):430–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai KH, Zhang J, Tan KC (2005) A TRIZ-based method for new service design. J Serv Res 8(1):48–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti A, Shu LH (2010) Biologically inspired design. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 24(4):453–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti A, Shea K, Stone R, Cagan J, Campbell M, Vargas-Hernandez N, Wood KL (2011) Computer-based design synthesis research: an overview. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 11(2):021003 (1–10)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng T-Y, Wang M-T (2013) The patent-classification technology/function matrix—a systematic method for design around. J Intellect Prop Rights 18(2):158–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs P, Fountain R (2011) Commercivity. In: Proceedings of the international conference on engineering and product design education, London, UK

  • Chiu I, Salustri FA (2010) Evaluating design project creativity in engineering design course. In: Proceedings of the 1st Canadian engineering education association conference, Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario

  • Chrysikou EG, Weisberg RW (2005) Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31(5):1134–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chulvi V, Gonzalez-Cruz MC, Mulet E, Aguilar-Zambrano J (2013) Influence of the type of idea-generation method on the creativity of solutions. Res Eng Des 24(1):33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crilly N (2015) Fixation and creativity in concept development: the attitudes and practices of expert designers. Des Stud 38:54–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly SR, Yilmaz S, Christian JL, Seifert CM, Gonzalez R (2012a) Design heuristics in engineering concept generation. J Eng Educ 101(4):601–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly SR, Christian JL, Yilmaz S, Seifert CM, Gonzalez R (2012b) Assessing design heuristics for idea generation in an introductory engineering course. Int J Eng Educ 28(2):463–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirkan H, Afacan Y (2011) Assessing creativity in design education: analysis of creativity factors in the first-year design studio. Des Stud 33(3):262–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieter GE, Schmidt LC (2013) Engineering design, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorst K, Cross N (2001) Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution. Des Stud 22(5):425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duran-Novoa R, Leon-Rovira N, Aguayo-Tellez H, Said D (2011) Inventive problem solving based on dialectical negation, using evolutionary algorithms and TRIZ heuristics. Comput Ind 62(4):437–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dym CL, Agogino AM, Eris O, Frey DD, Leifer LJ (2005) Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. J Eng Educ 94(1):103–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberle B (1995) Scamper. Prufrock Press, Waco

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert CM, Stacey M, Earl C (2005) References to past designs. In: Gero JS, Bonnardel N (eds) Studying designers’05. Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, Sydney, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogler HS, LeBlanc SE (2014) Strategies for creative problem solving, 3rd edn. Pearson Education Inc., London

    Google Scholar 

  • French M (1996) Conceptual design. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu K, Chan J, Cagan J, Kotovsky K, Schunn C, Wood K (2013) The meaning of “near” and “far”: the impact of structuring design databases and the effect of distance of analogy on design output. J Mech Des 135(2):021007 (1–12)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu K, Moreno D, Yang M, Wood KL (2014) Bio-inspired design: an overview investigating open questions from the broader field of design-by-analogy. J Mech Des 136(11):111102 (1–18)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garris CA (2001) The United States patent system: an essential role in engineering design education. J Eng Educ 90(2):239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel AK (1997) Design, analogy, and creativity. IEEE Expert Intell Syst Appl 12(3):62–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace K, Maher ML, Fisher D, Brady K (2015) Data-intensive evaluation of design creativity using novelty, value, and surprise. Int J Des Creativity Innov 3(3–4):125–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel A, Weil B (2009) C–K design theory: an advanced formulation. Res Eng Des 19(4):181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel A, Masson PL, Weil B (2011) Teaching innovative design reasoning: how concept–knowledge theory can help overcome fixation effects. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 25(1):77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz R (1999) Creative problem solving in engineering design, Thesis (Ph.D.), Faculty of Engineering, Tel-Aviv University

  • Horowitz R (2001) From TRIZ to ASIT in 4 steps. TRIZ J. http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2001/08/c/index.htm. Accessed 22 Feb 2016

  • Howard TJ, Culley SJ, Dekoninck E (2008) Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Des Stud 29(2):160–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard TJ, Culley SJ, Dekoninck E (2011) Reuse of ideas and concepts for creative stimuli in engineering design. J Eng Des 22(8):565–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard TJ, Maier AM, Onarheim B, Friis-Olivarius M (2013) Overcoming design fixation through education and creativity methods. In: Proceedings of the international conference on engineering design, Seoul, South Korea

  • Hung Y-C, Hsu Y-L (2007) An integrated process for designing around existing patents through the theory of inventive problem-solving. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 221(1):109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson DG, Smith SM (1991) Design fixation. Des Stud 12(1):pp 3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepner CH, Tregoe BB (1981) The new rational manager. Princeton Research Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh ECY (2013) Engineering design and intellectual property: where do they meet? Res Eng Des 24(4):325–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn NW, Smith SM (2011) Collaborative fixation: effects of other’s ideas on brainstorming. Appl Cogn Psychol 25(3):359–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokshagina O, Le Masson P, Weil B (2017) Should we manage the process of inventing? Des Patentability Res Eng Des 28(4):457–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kudrowitz B, Dippo C (2013) When does a paper clip become a sundial? Exploring the progression of originality in the alternative uses test. J Integr Des Process Sci 17(4):3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Wang J, Li X, Zhao W (2007) Design creativity in product innovation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33(3–4):213–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsey JS, Tseng I, Fu K, Cagan J, Wood KL, Schunn C (2010) A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. J Mech Des 132(4):041003 (1–12)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linsey JS, Markman AB, Wood KL (2012) Design by analogy: a study of the wordtree method for problem re-representation. J Mech Des 134(4):041009 (1–12)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Schonwetter DJ (2004) Teaching creativity in engineering. Int J Eng Educ 20:801–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Loh AP (2015) The Design Centric Programme at the National University of Singapore. In: Proceedings of the innovation practices in higher education expo (I-PHEX), Johor, Malaysia

  • Mabogunje A, Leifer LJ (1997) Noun phrases as surrogates for measuring early phases of the mechanical design process. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on design theory and methodology, Sacramento, CA

  • Miller R (2015) Why the hard science of engineering is no longer enough to meet the 21st century challenges, white paper, Olin College of Engineering

  • Moreno DP, Hernandez AA, Yang MC, Otto KN, Holtta-Otto K, Linsey JS, Wood KL, Linden A (2014) Fundamental studies in design-by-analogy: a focus on domain-knowledge experts and applications to transactional design problems. Des Stud 35(3):232–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J, Fu K, Otto K, Yang M, Jensen D, Wood K (2014) Function based design-by-analogy: a functional vector approach to analogical search. J Mech Des 136(10):101102 (1–16)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng HH, Koh ECY, Loh AP (2016) An interview study on student motivation in group-based engineering design projects. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on teaching, assessment, and learning for engineering (TALE2016), Bangkok, Thailand

  • Oman SK, Tumer IY, Wood K, Seepersad C (2013) A comparison of creativity and innovation metrics and sample validation through in-class design projects. Res Eng Des 24(1):65–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto K, Wood K (2001) Product design—techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhusen J, Grote KH (2007) Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer, London (trans and ed: Wallace, K., Blessing, L.T.M.)

  • Purcell AT, Gero JS (1996) Design and other types of fixation. Des Stud 17(4):363–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian L, Gero JS (1996) Function–behavior–structure paths and their role in analogy-based design. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 10(4):289–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan BSC, Chakrabarti A (2015) Assessment of novelty and quality across design phases. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on design creativity (3rd ICDC), Bangalore, India

  • Reich Y, Hatchuel A, Shai O, Subrahmanian E (2012) A theoretical analysis of creativity methods in engineering design: casting and improving ASIT within C–K theory. J Eng Des 23(2):137–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar P, Chakrabarti A (2008) Studying engineering design creativity-developing a common definition and associated measures. In: Proceedings of the NSF international workshop on studying design creativity’08, Aix-en-Provence, France

  • Sarkar P, Chakrabarti A (2011) Assessing design creativity. Des Stud 32(4):348–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar P, Chakrabarti A (2014) Ideas generated in conceptual design and their effects on creativity. Res Eng Des 25(3):185–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah JJ, Vargas-Hernandez N, Summers JD, Kulkarni S (2001) Collaborative sketching (C-Sketch)—an idea generation technique for engineering design. J Creative Behav 35(3):168–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah JJ, Vargas-Hernandez N, Smith SM (2003) Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Des Stud 24(2):111–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shai O, Reich Y (2004a) Infused design. I. Theory Res Eng Des 15(2):93–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Shai O, Reich Y (2004b) Infused design. II. Pract Res Eng Des 15(2):108–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Shai O, Reich Y, Hatchuel A, Subrahmanian E (2013) Creativity and scientific discovery with infused design and its analysis with C–K theory. Res Eng Des 24(2):201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sio UN, Kotovsky K, Cagan J (2015) Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes. Des Stud 39:70–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SM, Ward TB, Schumacher JS (1993) Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Mem Cogn 21(6):837–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snider CM, Culley SJ, Dekoninck EA (2013) Analysing creative behaviour in the later stage design process. Des Stud 34(5):543–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg RJ (2005) Creativity or creativities? Int J Hum Comput Stud 63(4–5):370–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg RJ, Lubart TI (1999) The concept of creativity: prospects and paradigms. In: Sternberg RJ (ed) Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan A-G, Li J, Rotgans J (2011) Creativity self-efficacy scale as a predictor for classroom behaviour in a Chinese student context. Open Educ J 4:90–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toh CA, Miller SR (2014) The impact of example modality and physical interactions on design creativity. J Mech Des 136(9):091004 (1–8)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toh CA, Miller SR (2016a) Choosing creativity: the role of individual risk and ambiguity aversion on creative concept selection in engineering design. Res Eng Des 27(3):195–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toh CA, Miller SR (2016b) Creativity in design teams: the influence of personality traits and risk attitudes on creative concept selection. Res Eng Des 27(1):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance EP (1976) Creativity testing in education. Creative Child Adult Q 1(3):136–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance EP (1988) The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In: Sternberg RJ (ed) The nature of creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 43–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng I, Moss J, Cagan J, Kotovsky K (2008) The role of timing and analogical similarity in the stimulation of idea generation in design. Des Stud 29(3):203–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos LA, Crilly N (2016) Inspiration and fixation: questions, methods, findings, and challenges. Des Stud 42:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos LA, Cardoso CC, Saaksjarvi M, Chen C-C, Crilly N (2017a) Inspiration and fixation: the influences of example designs and system properties in idea generation. J Mech Des 139(3):031101 (1–13)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos LA, Chen C-C, Taysom E, Crilly N (2017b) To copy or not to copy: the influence of instructions in design fixation experiments. In: Gero J (ed) Design computing and cognition ‘16. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan V, Linsey J (2013) Mitigation of design fixation in engineering idea generation: a study on the role of defixation instructions. In: Chakrabarti A, Prakash R (eds) ICoRD’13. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Springer, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan V, Tomko M, Linsey J (2016) A study on the effects of example familiarity and modality on design fixation. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 30(2):171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JO, Rosen D, Nelson BA, Yen J (2010) The effects of biological examples in idea generation. Des Stud 31(2):169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz S, Seifert CM, Gonzalez R (2010) Cognitive heuristics in design: instructional strategies to increase creativity in idea generation. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 24(3):335–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youmans RJ, Arciszewski T (2014) Design fixation: classifications and modern methods of prevention. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 28(2):129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the faculty members at the Innovation and Design Programme, National University of Singapore, for their support in facilitating the experiments. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable and constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Engineering Design and Innovation Centre, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Edwin C. Y. Koh

  2. Department of Technology Management and Innovation, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, New York City, USA

    Mark P. De Lessio

Authors
  1. Edwin C. Y. Koh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark P. De Lessio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edwin C. Y. Koh.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koh, E.C.Y., De Lessio, M.P. Fixation and distraction in creative design: the repercussions of reviewing patent documents to avoid infringement. Res Eng Design 29, 351–366 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-018-0290-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-018-0290-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation