Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Idea-configuration-evaluation (ICE): development and demonstration of a new prescriptive model of the conceptual engineering design process based on parameter analysis and C–K theory

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Research in Engineering Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces a new prescriptive model of conceptual engineering design. The model is based on the method called parameter analysis (PA) and the relatively new descriptive model called C–K theory. PA was developed based on observations of designers in action, while C–K theory has a strong foundation in logic theory. The new model combines the benefits of C–K theory and PA to overcome the lack of a strong theoretical foundation in PA and the insufficient prescriptive power of C–K theory. The paper describes in detail the process of developing the new model, which was similar to product development. It started with conceptualization in order to define a set of key factors and principles, i.e., the conceptual foundation or the “ideology” of the new prescriptive model. Next, those principles were integrated into a structured systematic procedure to form the new prescriptive model. The conceptual design of a realistic design task is used to demonstrate the application of the new model. The significance of the current work is the contribution to the theory and practice of engineering design, eventually leading to improved design processes and better designed products. Reporting on the experimental testing of the new model will follow in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altshuller GS (1984) Creativity as an exact science: the theory of the solution of inventive problems. Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen MM, Howard TJ, Bruun HPL (2014) Domain theory, its models and concepts. In: Chakrabarti A, Blessing LTM (eds) An anthology of theories and models of design: philosophy, approaches and empirical explorations. Springer, London, pp 171–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Badke-Schaub P, Eris O (2014) A theory of design intuition: does design methodology need to account for processes of the unconscious such as intuition? In: Chakrabarti A, Blessing LTM (eds) An anthology of theories and models of design: philosophy, approaches and empirical explorations. Springer, London, pp 351–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball L, Evans J, Dennis I (1994) Cognitive processes in engineering design: a longitudinal study. Ergonomics 37(11):1753–1786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blessing LTM, Chakrabarti A (2009) DRM, a design research methodology. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bracha D, Reich Y (2003) Topological structures for modelling engineering design processes. Res Eng Des 14(4):185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallucci D (2014) Designing the inventive way in the innovation area. In: Chakrabarti A, Blessing LTM (eds) An anthology of theories and models of design: philosophy, approaches and empirical explorations. Springer, London, pp 233–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti A, Bligh TP (2001) A scheme for functional reasoning in conceptual design. Des Stud 22:493–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Zhao M, Xie Y, Zhang Z (2015a) A new model of conceptual design based on scientific ontology and intentionality theory. Part I: the conceptual foundation. Des Stud 37:12–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Zhao M, Xie Y, Zhang Z (2015b) A new model of conceptual design based on scientific ontology and intentionality theory. Part II: the process model. Des Stud 38:139–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiaans H, Dorst C (1992) Cognitive models in industrial design engineering: a protocol study. In: Taylor DL, Stauffer DA (eds) Design theory and methodology—DTM92. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coatanéa E, Roca R, Mokhtarian H, Mokammel F, Ikkala K (2016) A conceptual modeling and simulation framework for system design. Comput Sci Eng 18(4):42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross N (2000) Engineering design methods: strategies for product design, 3rd edn. The Open University, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross N (2004) Expertise in design: an overview. Des Stud 25(5):427–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culley SJ (2014) Revisiting design as an information processing activity. In: Chakrabarti A, Blessing LTM (eds) An anthology of theories and models of design: philosophy, approaches and empirical explorations. Springer, London, pp 371–394

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dorst K, Cross N (2001) Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Des Stud 22(5):425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmquist M, Le Masson P (2009) The value of a ‘failed’ R&D project: an emerging evaluation framework for building innovative capabilities. R&D Manag 39(2):136–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finger S, Dixon JR (1989) A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part I Descriptive, prescriptive, and computer-based models of design processes. Res Eng Des 1:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg K, Mooz H (1991) The relationship of system engineering to the project cycle. In: Proceedings of the first annual symposium of national council on system engineering, October 1991, pp 57–65

  • Fricke G (1996) Successful individual approaches in engineering design. Res Eng Des 8:151–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gero JS (1996) Creativity, emergence and evolution in design: concepts and framework. Knowl Based Syst 9(7):435–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2004) The situated function–behaviour–structure framework. Des Stud 25:373–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt G (2014) Modeling the role of sketching in design idea generation. In: Chakrabarti A, Blessing LTM (eds) An anthology of theories and models of design: philosophy, approaches and empirical explorations. Springer, London, pp 431–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel A, Weil B (2002) C–K theory: notions and applications of a unified design theory. In: Proceedings of Herbert Simon international conference on design sciences, Lyon

  • Hatchuel A, Weil B (2003) A new approach of innovative design: an introduction to C–K theory. In: Proceedings of 14th international conference on engineering and design (ICED’03), Stockholm, pp 109–124

  • Hatchuel A, Weil B (2009) C–K design theory: an advanced formulation. Res Eng Des 19:181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel A, Le Masson P, Weil B (2009) Design theory and collective creativity: a theoretical framework to evaluate KCP process. International conference on engineering and design (ICED’09), Stanford University

  • Hatchuel A, Le Masson P, Reich Y, Weil B (2011) A systematic approach of design theories using generativeness and robustness. International conference on engineering and design (ICED’11), Paper no. DS68_2-238, Copenhagen, 15–18 August

  • Hillier FS, Lieberman GJ (2005) Introduction to operations research, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JC (1963) A method of systematic design. In: Conference on design methods. Pergamon Press, Oxford

  • Kazakçi AO, Tsoukias A (2005) Extending the C–K design theory: a theoretical background for personal design assistants. J Eng Des 16(4):399–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll E (2013) Design theory and conceptual design: contrasting functional decomposition and morphology with parameter analysis. Res Eng Des 24:165–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll E, Koskela L (2016) Explicating concepts in reasoning from function to form by two-step innovative abductions. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 30:125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll E, Shihmanter A (2011) Capturing the conceptual design process with concept-configuration-evaluation triplets. International conference on engineering and design (ICED’11), Copenhagen, 15–18 August

  • Kroll E, Weisbrod G (2015) A search and optimization perspective on conceptual design. International conference on engineering and design (ICED’15), Milan, 27–30 July

  • Kroll E, Condoor SS, Jansson DG (2001) Innovative conceptual design: theory and application of parameter analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll E, Le Masson P, Weil B (2013) Modeling parameter analysis design moves with C–K theory. International conference on engineering and design (ICED’13), Seoul, 19–22 August

  • Kroll E, Le Masson P, Weil B (2014) Steepest-first exploration with learning-based path evaluation: uncovering the design strategy of parameter analysis with C–K theory. Res Eng Des 25:351–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger C, Cross N (2006) Solution driven versus problem driven design: strategies and outcomes. Des Stud 27:527–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson B (1979) Cognitive strategies in architectural design. Ergonomics 22:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Masson P, Weil B, Hatchuel A (2010) Strategic management of innovation and design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher ML (2001) A model of co-evolutionary design. Eng Comput 16:195–208

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marques PDBC, Silva AJPF, Henriques EMP, Magee CL (2014) A descriptive framework of the design process from a dual cognitive engineering perspective. Int J Des Creat Innov 2(3):142–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motte D (2015) Effectiveness of the systematic engineering design methodology. International conference on engineering and design (ICED’15), Milan, 27–30 July

  • Osborn AF (1963) Applied imagination: principles and procedures of creative problem-solving, 3rd edn. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhusen J, Grote KH (2007) Engineering design: a systematic approach, 3rd edn. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pressman RS (2001) Software engineering: a practitioner’s approach. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh S (1991) Total design: integrated methods for successful product engineering. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich Y, Hatchuel A, Shai O, Subrahmanian E (2012) A theoretical analysis of creativity methods in engineering design: casting and improving ASIT within C–K theory. J Eng Des 23(2):137–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roozenburg NFM, Eekels J (1995) Product design: fundamentals and methods. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe P (1987) Design thinking. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah J, Noe VH (2003) Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Des Stud 24:111–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shai O, Reich Y (2004) Infused design: II practice. Res Eng Des 15(2):108–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Shai O, Reich Y, Hatchuel A, Subrahmanian E (2013) Creativity and scientific discovery with infused design and its analysis with C–K theory. Res Eng Des 24:201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1972) Theories of bounded rationality. In: McGuire CB, Radner R (eds) Decision and organization. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 161–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh NP (1990) Principles of design. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman DG (2010) The mechanical design process, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman DG, Dietterich TG (1987) Mechanical design methodology: implications on future developments of computer-aided design and knowledge-based systems. Eng Comput 2:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber C (2005) CPM/PDD—an extended theoretical approach to modelling products and product development processes. In: Bley H, Jansen H, Krause F-L, Shpitalni M (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd German–Israeli symposium on advances in methods and systems for development of products and processes, TU Berlin/Fraunhofer-Institut—für Produktionsanlagen und Konstruktionstechnik (IPK), 7–8 July. Fraunhofer-IRB, Stuttgart, pp 159–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod G (2008) Parachuted radar decoy. US patent no. 7,336,216

  • Woodbury RF, Burrow AL (2006) Whither design space? Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 20:63–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa H (1981) General Design Theory and CAD system. In: Sata T, War-man E (eds) Man–machine communication in CAD/CAM. In: Proceedings of the IFIP WG5.2-5.3 Working conference 1980 (Tokyo), pp 35–37

  • Zeiler W (2012) Stimulating creativity in building design education: introducing experts and C–K’s C-projectors. 2nd international conference on design creativity (ICDC2012), Glasgow, 18–20 September

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Israel Science Foundation under Grant number 546/12.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 32000, Israel

    Gil Weisbrod

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, ORT Braude College, Karmiel, 2161002, Israel

    Ehud Kroll

Authors
  1. Gil Weisbrod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ehud Kroll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehud Kroll.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weisbrod, G., Kroll, E. Idea-configuration-evaluation (ICE): development and demonstration of a new prescriptive model of the conceptual engineering design process based on parameter analysis and C–K theory. Res Eng Design 29, 203–225 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-017-0263-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-017-0263-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation