Abstract
The presence of immature concepts makes decision-making difficult in upstream phases of a development project. A company’s enthusiasm to improve product performance by exploring novel concepts is hampered by a low maturity that results in an inherent risk of cost overruns and schedule delays. Besides this, decisions taken during conceptual design phases have a critical impact on product life-cycle cost. In this context, a useful practice is to develop two or more concepts in parallel and delay decision-making until sufficient knowledge is generated. Even so, a preliminary screening of concepts is usually needed because of the substantial resources and time required for the development activities. In this paper, a concept screening approach is proposed at the conceptual design phase on the basis of two metrics. The first assesses risk related to the non-completion of design criteria while respecting available time (consideration of deadline) and company resources. The second metric assesses the expected performance of novel concepts compared with the existing products. It uses preference functions and generalized ordered weighted averaging operators. Fuzzy logic tools are used in the two metrics to capture and propagate imprecision in the description of design and external environment. In order to prove its value, the proposed approach was applied to the development of a solar collector in an industrial environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antonsson EK, Otto KN (1995) Imprecision in engineering design. J Mech Des Trans ASME 117(B):25–32
Beth CM, Konrad M, Shrum S (2007) CMMI, second edition—guidelines for process integration and product improvement. Addison Wesley, Boston
Collignan C, Sebastian P, Pailhes J, Ledoux Y (2012) Arc-elasticity and hierarchical exploration of the neighborhood of solutions in mechanical design. Adv Eng Inform 26:603–617
Conrow E (2011) Estimating technology readiness level coefficients. J Spacecr Rockets 48:146–152
Dong WM, Wong FS (1987) Fuzzy weighted averages and implementation of the extension principle. Fuzzy Sets Syst 21(2):183–199
Dre´mont N, Troussier N, Whitfield I, Duffy A (2013) A metric to evaluate data maturity to help decision making: Application in preliminary collaborative design of mechanical systems. In: Proceedings of 19th international conference on engineering design, 19–22 August 2013. Seoul, Korea, pp 159–168
Dunn J (1990) Simultaneous engineering side-by-side to success. Engineer 271(7020):51–53
Engler III WO, Biltgen PT, Mavris DN (2007) Concept selection using an interactive reconfigurable matrix of alternatives. In: 45th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, 8–11 Jan 2007. Reno, Nevada
Giapoulis A (2000) Einsatz von Methoden zur Produktentwicklung in der industriellen Praxis. VDI Berichte
Guitouni A, Martel JM (1998) Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. Eur J Oper Res 109(2):501–521
Harrington EC (1965) The desirability function. Ind Qual Contr 21(10):494–498
Jasimuddin SM, Klein JH, Connell C (2005) The paradox of using tacit and explicit knowledge. Manage Decis 43:102–112
Jha A (2009) Concentrated solar power could generate ‘quarter of world’s energy’. The guardian publishing website (26 May 2009). www.guardian.co.uk
Katz DR, Sarkani S, Mazzuchi T, Conrow EH (2015) The relationship of technology and design maturity to DoD weapon system cost change and schedule change during engineering and manufacturing development. Syst Eng 18(1):1–15. doi:10.1111/sys.21281
Krantz DH, Luce RD, Suppes P, Tversky A (1971) Foundations of measurement volume I: additive and polynomial representations. Academic Press: New York
Kreinovich V, Ferson S, Ginzburg L, Schulte H, Barry M, Nguyen H (1999) From interval methods of representing uncertainty to a general description of uncertainty. In: Mohanty H, Baral C (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on information technology, 20–22 Dec 1999. McGraw-Hill, Bhubaneswar, pp 161–166
Krishnan V (1996) Managing the simultaneous execution of coupled phases in concurrent product development. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 43(2):210–217
Kumara V, Shrivastavaa RL, Untawaleb SP (2015) Fresnel lens: a promising alternative of reflectors in concentrated solar power. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 4:376–390
Li Y, Mavris DN, DeLaurentis D (2004) The investigation of a decision making technique using the loss function. In: AIAA 4th aviation technology, integration and operations, Chicago, Illinois
Malak RJ Jr, Aughenbaugh JM, Paredis CJJ (2009) Multi-attribute utility analysis in set-based conceptual design. CAD Comput Aided Des 41(3):214–227
Mankins JC (1995) Technology readiness levels (White paper). NASA Advanced Concepts Office, Washington, DC
Morgan JM, Liker JK (2006) The Toyota product development system: integrating people, process and technology. Productivity Press, Seattle, WA
Muhanna RL, Mullen RL (2004) Interval methods for reliable computing. In: Nikolaidis E, Ghiocel DM, Singhal S (eds) Engineering design reliability handbook. CRC Press, New York
Neumann JV, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behaviour, Science editions. Wiley, Hoboken
O'Brien C, Smith SJE (1995) Design maturity assessment for concurrent engineering co-ordination. Int J Prod Econ 41(1-3):311–320
Okudan GE, Tauhid S (2008) Concept selection methods–a literature review from 1980 to 2008. Int J Des Eng 1(3):243–277
Pahl G, Beitz W (1986) Konstruktionslehre, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, London
Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design; a systematic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, London
Polanyi M (1967) The study of man. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Reich Y (2008) Preventing breakthroughs from breakdowns. In: Proceedings of the 9th biennial ASME conference on engineering systems design and analysis ESDA2008, Haifa, Israel
Roubens M (1989) Some properties of choice functions based on valued binary relations. Eur J Oper Res 40:309–321
Roy B, Słowiński R (2013) Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. EURO J Decis Processes 1(1-2):69–97
Scott MJ, Antonsson EK (1998) Aggregation functions for engineering design trade-offs. Fuzzy Sets Syst 99(3):253–264
Scott MJ, Antonsson EK (2000) Using indifference points in engineering decisions. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on design theory and methodology, Baltimore, MD. ASME
Sharif N, Huang C (2012) Innovation strategy, firm survival and relocation: the case of Hong Kong-owned manufacturing in Guangdong Province, China. Res Policy 41:69–78
Sobek DK, Ward AC, Liker JK (1999) Toyota’s principles of set-based concurrent engineering. Sloan Manage Rev 40(2):67–83
Tomiyama T, Gu P, Jin Y, Lutters D, Kind CH, Kimura F (2009) Design methodologies: industrial and educational applications. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(2009):543–565
Ullman DG, Spiegel BP (2006) 9.3.1 Trade studies with uncertain information. INCOSE Int Symp 16(1):1294–1307
Wang J, Terpenny J (2004) Interactive evolutionary solution synthesis in fuzzy setbased preliminary engineering design. J Intell Manuf 14(2):153–167
Ward AC (2007) Lean product and process development. Lean Enterprises Institute Inc., Cambridge, MA
Wood KL, Antonsson EK (1989) Computations with imprecise parameters in engineering design: background and theory. ASME J Mech Transm Autom Des 111(4):616–625
Zimmer L, Zablit P (2001) Global aircraft predesign based on constraint propagation and interval analysis. In: Proceedings of CEAS conference on multidisciplinary aircraft design and optimisation, Köln
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
El Amine, M., Pailhes, J. & Perry, N. Integration of concept maturity in decision-making for engineering design: an application to a solar collector development. Res Eng Design 28, 235–250 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-016-0239-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-016-0239-y