Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cool outflows in galaxies and their implications

  • Review Article
  • Published:
The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review Aims and scope

Abstract

Neutral-atomic and molecular outflows are a common occurrence in galaxies, near and far. They operate over the full extent of their galaxy hosts, from the innermost regions of galactic nuclei to the outermost reaches of galaxy halos. They carry a substantial amount of material that would otherwise have been used to form new stars. These cool outflows may have a profound impact on the evolution of their host galaxies and environments. This article provides an overview of the basic physics of cool outflows, a comprehensive assessment of the observational techniques and diagnostic tools used to characterize them, a detailed description of the best-studied cases, and a more general discussion of the statistical properties of these outflows in the local and distant universe. The remaining outstanding issues that have not yet been resolved are summarized at the end of the review to inspire new research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Images reproduced with permission from (a, b) Rupke and Veilleux (2011), (c) Veilleux et al. (2009b), copyright by AAS; and (b) Cicone et al. (2015), copyright by ESO; and (d, e) Bolatto et al. (2013a), copyright by Macmillan

Fig. 2

Images reproduced with permission from (a, b) Tanner et al. (2016), copyright by AAS; and (c, d) Girichidis et al. (2018), copyright by the authors

Fig. 3

Images reproduced with permission from Richings and Faucher-Giguère (2018b) and Mukherjee et al. (2018b), copyright by the authors

Fig. 4

Images reproduced with permission from (a) Schneider and Robertson (2017), (c) Zhang and Davis (2017), copyright by AAS; and (b) Banda-Barragán et al. (2019), (d) Gronke and Oh (2018), copyright by the authors

Fig. 5

Images reproduced with permission from Lutz et al. (2020), copyright by the authors

Fig. 6

Images reproduced with permission from (a) Morganti et al. (2005), copyrightby ESO; and (b) Rupke et al. (2017), (c) Erb et al. (2012), (d) Janssen et al. (2016), (e) Cicone et al. (2018b), (f) Pettini et al. (2002), copyright by AAS

Fig. 7

Images reproduced with permission from (a) González-Alfonso et al. (2017b), (c) Rupke and Veilleux (2013a), copyright by AAS; and Cicone et al. (2014), copyright by ESO

Fig. 8

Images reproduced with permission from (a) Howk and Savage (2000), (b) Hoopes et al. (2005), (c) Jones et al. (2019b), and (d, e) Meléndez et al. (2015), copyright by AAS

Fig. 9

Images reproduced with permission from (a) Su et al. (2010), (d) Bland-Hawthorn and Cohen (2003), (e, f) Hsieh et al. (2016), (g) Lockman and McClure-Griffiths (2016), (h) Lockman et al. (2020), copyright by AAS; (b) Ponti et al. (2019), (c) Heywood et al. (2019), copyright by the author(s)

Fig. 10

Images reproduced with permission from (a) Barger et al. (2016), copyright by AAS; and (b) McClure-Griffiths et al. (2018), copyright by the authors

Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Images reproduced with permission from (a) Veilleux et al. (2016), (b) Rupke and Veilleux (2011), (f) González-Alfonso et al. (2017b), copyright by AAS; and (c) Morganti et al. (2016), (d, g) Feruglio et al. (2015), (e) Aalto et al. (2015a), copyright by ESO

Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Images reproduced with permission from Roussel et al. (2006), copyright by AAS; and Aalto et al. (2016), copyright by ESO

Fig. 16

Images reproduced with permission from Roberts-Borsani and Saintonge (2019), copyright by the authors

Fig. 17

Images reproduced with permission from Rubin et al. (2014), copyright by AAS

Fig. 18

Images reproduced with permission from Chisholm et al. (2015), Heckman and Borthakur (2016), copyright by AAS

Fig. 19

Images reproduced with permission from (a) Rupke and Veilleux (2015), copyright by AAS; and (b) Finley et al. (2017), copyright by ESO; and (c) Rupke et al. (2019), copyright by the authors

Fig. 20

Images reproduced with permission from Lan et al. (2014) and Lan and Mo (2018), copyright by AAS

Fig. 21

Images reproduced with permission from Stone et al. (2016), copyright by AAS; and Lutz et al. (2020), copyright by the authors

Fig. 22

Images reproduced with permission from González-Alfonso et al. (2017b), copyright by AAS

Fig. 23

Images reproduced with permission from Fluetsch et al. (2019), copyright by the authors

Fig. 24

Images reproduced with permission from Ménard et al. (2010), copyright by the authors; and Peek et al. (2015), copyright by AAS

Fig. 25

Images reproduced with permission from McCormick et al. (2013), copyright by AAS

Fig. 26

Images reproduced with permission from McCormick et al. (2018), copyright by the authors

Fig. 27

Image reproduced with permission from Hodges-Kluck et al. 2016a, copyright by AAS

Fig. 28

Image reproduced with permission from Smith et al. (2019), copyright by AAS

Fig. 29
Fig. 30

Images reproduced with permission from (a) Carniani et al. (2017), (b) Feruglio et al. (2017), (c–d) Brusa et al. (2018), copyright by ESO; and (e) Herrera-Camus et al. (2019b), copyright by AAS

Fig. 31

Images reproduced with permission from (a) George et al. (2014), copyright by the authors; (b) Herrera-Camus et al. 2020, copyrighty by ESO; (c, d) Spilker et al. (2018), copyright by the authors; (e, f) Jones et al. (2019a), copyright by ESO

Fig. 32
Fig. 33

Images reproduced with permission from Sugahara et al. (2019), copyright by AAS

Fig. 34

Images reproduced with permission from (a) Prochaska et al. (2014), (b) Lau et al. (2018), copyright by AAS; and (c) Cicone et al. (2015), (d, e) Bischetti et al. (2019a), copyright by ESO

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that there is a typographical error in the numerical formulae of Rupke et al. (2005c): in their equations 13–18, the normalization factor of the column density N should be 10\(^{20}\) cm\(^{-2}\) rather than 10\(^{21}\) cm\(^{-2}\). The outflow energetics published in Rupke et al. (2005c) are based on the correct formulae and not affected by this error.

  2. Both Eqs. (28) and (29) assume \(T \sim 10^4\) K, while Eq. (29) further assumes that \(n_\mathrm{e} \lesssim 7 \times 10^5\) cm,\(^{-3}\) the critical density associated with the [O III] 5007 transition above which collisional de-excitation becomes significant.

  3. Just as for CO, high opacities can impact the critical density for e.g., HCN which may be very abundant in warm regions. In addition, the critical density can be strongly reduced (by factors 4–6) in regions of high temperature. This requires a multi-level treatment of the critical density.

  4. Sarangi et al. (2019) have recently suggested that nuclear AGN winds may also be sites of dust formation.

  5. There is also evidence that the AGN in the GC was \(\sim 10^5\) more active in the recent past (\(\sim 10^{2 -3}\) years), although still greatly sub-Eddington (\(L/L_{\mathrm{Edd}} \lesssim 10^{-5}\)), based on the detection of strong fluorescent \({\mathrm{Fe}}\,{\mathrm{K}}\alpha \) line emission off of molecular clouds near the GC (Sunyaev et al. 1993; Koyama et al. 1996; Ponti et al. 2010).

  6. For instance, Krumholz et al. (2017a) argue that the average SFR is closer to \(\sim \) 1 \(M_\odot \) \({\mathrm{year}}^{-1}\), more in line with the estimated mass supply rate to the CMZ (\(\gtrsim \) 1 \(M_\odot \) \({\mathrm{year}}^{-1}\), Sormani and Barnes 2019).

  7. As pointed out by Sparre et al. (2019), instabilities have a smaller effect in 3D than in 2D because a 3D flow has the freedom to use the z-direction to avoid disturbing dense clouds. As a result, the level of fragmentation is lower in 3D than in 2D, and the increase in covering fraction for large clouds in 3D is less than that seen in 2D.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the two referees of this review, particularly Mark Krumholz who provided a thorough report and made several constructive suggestions which improved the review. S.V. thanks the Editor, Joel Bregman, for the invitation to write this review. He thanks NASA for partial support of this research through NASA Grant ADAP NNX16AF24G. S.V. also acknowledges support from a Raymond and Beverley Sackler Distinguished Visitor Fellowship and thanks the host institute, the Institute of Astronomy, where most of this review was written. He is also grateful for support by the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) and by the Kavli Institute for Cosmology, Cambridge. S.V. also appreciates the hospitality of the Space Telescope Science Institute, where this review was completed. R.M. acknowledges ERC Advanced Grant 695671 ‘QUENCH’ and support by the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC). A.B. acknowledges partial support from NSF-AST1615960. S. A. acknowledges funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, Grant agreement no. ERC-2017-ADG-789410. S.A. also acknowledges the Swedish Research Council Grant 621-2011-4143.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Astronomy and Joint Space-Science Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA

    Sylvain Veilleux & Alberto D. Bolatto

  2. Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK

    Sylvain Veilleux

  3. Kavli Institute for Cosmology Cambridge, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK

    Sylvain Veilleux & Roberto Maiolino

  4. Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA

    Sylvain Veilleux

  5. Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK

    Roberto Maiolino

  6. Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Onsala Space Observatory, 439 92, Onsala, Sweden

    Susanne Aalto

Authors
  1. Sylvain Veilleux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roberto Maiolino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alberto D. Bolatto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Susanne Aalto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvain Veilleux.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veilleux, S., Maiolino, R., Bolatto, A.D. et al. Cool outflows in galaxies and their implications. Astron Astrophys Rev 28, 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-019-0121-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-019-0121-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation