Skip to main content
Log in

Solar magnetic fields as revealed by Stokes polarimetry

  • REVIEW ARTICLE
  • Published:
The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review Aims and scope

Abstract

Observational astrophysics started when spectroscopy could be applied to astronomy. Similarly, observational work on stellar magnetic fields became possible with the application of spectro-polarimetry. In recent decades there have been dramatic advances in the observational tools for spectro-polarimetry. The four Stokes parameters that provide a complete representation of partially polarized light can now be simultaneously imaged with megapixel array detectors with high polarimetric precision (10−5 in the degree of polarization). This has led to new insights about the nature and properties of the magnetic field, and has helped pave the way for the use of the Hanle effect as a diagnostic tool beside the Zeeman effect. The magnetic structuring continues on scales orders of magnitudes smaller than the resolved ones, but various types of spectro-polarimetric signatures can be identified, which let us determine the field strengths and angular distributions of the field vectors in the spatially unresolved domain. Here we review the observational properties of the magnetic field, from the global patterns to the smallest scales at the magnetic diffusion limit, and relate them to the global and local dynamos.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altschuler MD, Trotter DE, Newkirk G Jr, Howard R (1974) The large-scale solar magnetic field. Sol Phys 39:3–17. doi:10.1007/BF00154967

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Anusha LS, Nagendra KN, Bianda M, Stenflo JO, Holzreuter R, Sampoorna M, Frisch H, Ramelli R, Smitha HN (2011) Analysis of the Forward-scattering Hanle Effect in the Ca I 4227 Å Line. Astrophys J 737:95. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/95

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Asensio Ramos A (2009) Evidence for quasi-isotropic magnetic fields from Hinode quiet-Sun observations. Astrophys J 701:1032. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/1032

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Auer LH, Heasley JN (1978) The origin of broad-band circular polarization in sunspots. Astron Astrophys 64:67–71

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock HW (1953) The solar magnetograph. Astrophys J 118:387

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock HW (1961) The topology of the Sun’s magnetic field and the 22-year cycle. Astrophys J 133:572–587. doi:10.1086/147060

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Baur TG, House LL, Hull HK (1980) A spectrum scanning Stokes polarimeter. Sol Phys 65:111–146. doi:10.1007/BF00151388

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Berdyugina SV, Fluri DM (2004) Evidence for the Hanle effect in molecular lines. Astron Astrophys 417:775–784. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034452

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Berdyugina SV, Nagendra KN, Ramelli R (eds) (2009) In: Solar polarization 5: in honor of Jan Olof Stenflo. Astronomical society of the pacific conference series, vol 405

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianda M, Ramelli R, Anusha LS, Stenflo JO, Nagendra KN, Holzreuter R, Sampoorna M, Frisch H, Smitha HN (2011) Observations of the forward scattering Hanle effect in the Ca I 4227 Å line. Astron Astrophys 530:L13. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117047

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bommier V, Sahal-Brechot S (1978) Quantum theory of the Hanle effect—calculations of the Stokes parameters of the D3 helium line for quiescent prominences. Astron Astrophys 69:57–64

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg A (2005) The case for a distributed solar dynamo shaped by near-surface shear. Astrophys J 625:539. doi:10.1086/429584. arXiv:astro-ph/0502275

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg A, Subramanian K (2005) Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory. Phys Rep 417:1–209. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.06.005. arXiv:astro-ph/0405052

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Buehler D, Lagg A, Solanki SK (2013) Quiet Sun magnetic fields observed by Hinode: support for a local dynamo. Astron Astrophys 555:A33. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321152

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Casini R, Lites BW (eds) (2006) In: Solar polarization 4. Astronomical society of the pacific conference series, vol 358

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo F (1999) On the origin of magnetic fields in the quiet photosphere. Astrophys J Lett 515:L39–L42. doi:10.1086/311962

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Charbonneau P (2010) Dynamo models of the solar cycle. Living Rev Sol Phys 7:3. doi:10.12942/lrsp-2010-3

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Danilovic S, Schüssler M, Solanki SK (2010) Magnetic field intensification: comparison of 3D MHD simulations with Hinode/SP results. Astron Astrophys 509:A76. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912283

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Dasi-Espuig M, Solanki SK, Krivova NA, Cameron R, Peñuela T (2010) Sunspot group tilt angles and the strength of the solar cycle. Astron Astrophys 518:A7. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014301

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • del Toro Iniesta JC (2003) Introduction to spectropolarimetry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRosa ML, Brun AS, Hoeksema JT (2012) Solar magnetic field reversals and the role of dynamo families. Astrophys J 757:96. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/96

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1946) Induction effects in terrestrial magnetism. Part I. Theory. Phys Rev 69:106–116

    MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1956) Hydromagnetic dynamo theory. Rev Mod Phys 28:135–163

    MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Faurobert-Scholl M (1993) Investigation of microturbulent magnetic fields in the solar photosphere by their Hanle effect in the Sr I 4607 A line. Astron Astrophys 268:765–774

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Faurobert-Scholl M, Feautrier N, Machefert F, Petrovay K, Spielfiedel A (1995) Turbulent magnetic fields in the solar photosphere: diagnostics and interpretation. Astron Astrophys 298:289

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer CE, de Wijn AG, Centeno R, Lites BW, Keller CU (2009) Statistics of convective collapse events in the photosphere and chromosphere observed with the Hinode SOT. Astron Astrophys 504:583–588. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912445

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier EN, Stenflo JO (1972) On the small-scale structure of solar magnetic fields. Sol Phys 27:330–346. doi:10.1007/BF00153105

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Gandorfer A (2000) The second solar spectrum: a high spectral resolution polarimetric survey of scattering polarization at the solar limb in graphical representation. Volume I: 4625 Å to 6995 Å. vdf Hochschulverlag, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandorfer A (2002) The second solar spectrum: a high spectral resolution polarimetric survey of scattering polarization at the solar limb in graphical representation. Volume II: 3910 Å to 4630 Å. vdf Hochschulverlag, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandorfer A (2005) The second solar spectrum: a high spectral resolution polarimetric survey of scattering polarization at the solar limb in graphical representation. Volume III: 3160 Å to 3915 Å. vdf Hochschulverlag, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandorfer AM, Steiner P, Povel HP, Aebersold F, Egger U, Feller A, Gisler D, Hagenbuch S, Stenflo JO (2004) Solar polarimetry in the near UV with the Zurich Imaging Polarimeter ZIMPOL II. Astron Astrophys 422:703–708. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040254

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Giovanelli RG (1980) An exploratory two-dimensional study of the coarse structure of network magnetic fields. Sol Phys 68:49–69. doi:10.1007/BF00153266

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hale GE (1908) On the probable existence of a magnetic field in sun-spots. Astrophys J 28:315. doi:10.1086/141602

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hale GE, Seares FH, van Maanen A, Ellerman F (1918) The general magnetic field of the Sun. Apparent variation of field-strength with level in the solar atmosphere. Astrophys J 47:206–254. doi:10.1086/142403

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hale GE, Ellerman F, Nicholson SB, Joy AH (1919) The magnetic polarity of sun-spots. Astrophys J 49:153–178. doi:10.1086/142452

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanle W (1924) Über magnetische Beeinflussung der Polarisation der Resonanzfluoreszenz. Z Phys 30:93–105

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey J, Livingston W, Slaughter C (1972) A line-profile Stokesmeter: preliminary results on non-sunspot fields. In: Line formation in the presence of magnetic fields. HAO/NCAR, Boulder, pp 227–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey JW, Branston D, Henney CJ, Keller CU (SOLIS and GONG Teams) (2007) Seething horizontal magnetic fields in the quiet solar photosphere. Astrophys J Lett 659:L177–L180. doi:10.1086/518036. arXiv:astro-ph/0702415

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey KL (1993) Magnetic bipoles on the Sun. PhD thesis, Univ Utrecht

  • Harvey KL, Martin SF (1973) Ephemeral active regions. Sol Phys 32:389–402. doi:10.1007/BF00154951

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey KL, Zwaan C (1993) Properties and emergence of bipolar active regions. Sol Phys 148:85–118. doi:10.1007/BF00675537

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey KL, Harvey JW, Martin SF (1975) Ephemeral active regions in 1970 and 1973. Sol Phys 40:87–102. doi:10.1007/BF00183154

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan SS, Rutten RJ (eds) (2010) Magnetic coupling between the interior and atmosphere of the Sun. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02859-5

  • House LL (1970a) The resonance fluorescence of polarized radiation. I. The general scattering function. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 10:909–928. doi:10.1016/0022-4073(70)90033-6

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • House LL (1970b) The resonance fluorescence of polarized radiation. II. Scattering in the normal Zeeman triplet (J=0−J″=1). J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 10:1171–1189. doi:10.1016/0022-4073(70)90002-6

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • House LL (1971) The resonance fluorescence of polarized radiation. III. The Stokes parameter and circular polarization formulation of the scattering redistribution function. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 11:367–383. doi:10.1016/0022-4073(71)90121-X

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • House LL, Baur TG, Hull HK (1975) Initial operation of a scanning Stokes polarimeter. Sol Phys 45:495–500. doi:10.1007/BF00158465

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Howard R, Stenflo JO (1972) On the filamentary nature of solar magnetic fields. Sol Phys 22:402–417. doi:10.1007/BF00148705

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Illing RME, Landman DA, Mickey DL (1975) Broad-band circular polarization of sunspots—Spectral dependence and theory. Astron Astrophys 41:183–185

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov VV (1991) Analytical methods of line formation theory—are they still alive. In: NATO ASIC proc 341: Stellar atmospheres—beyond classical models, p 81

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang J, Cameron RH, Schmitt D, Işık E (2013) Modeling solar cycles 15 to 21 using a flux transport dynamo. Astron Astrophys 553:A128. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321145

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones HP, Giovanelli RG (1983) Magnetic canopies in unipolar regions. Sol Phys 87:37–42. doi:10.1007/BF00151157

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller CU (1992) Resolution of magnetic flux tubes on the Sun. Nature 359:307. doi:10.1038/359307a0

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Khlystova AI, Sokoloff DD (2009) Toroidal magnetic field of the Sun from data on Hale-rule-violating sunspot groups. Astron Rep 53:281–285. doi:10.1134/S106377290903010X

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Khomenko E, Collados M (2007) On the Stokes V amplitude ratio as an indicator of the field strength in the solar internetwork. Astrophys J 659:1726–1735. doi:10.1086/512098

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleint L, Berdyugina SV, Shapiro AI, Bianda M (2010) Solar turbulent magnetic fields: surprisingly homogeneous distribution during the solar minimum. Astron Astrophys 524:A37. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015285

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Knaack R, Stenflo JO (2005) Spherical harmonic decomposition of solar magnetic fields. Astron Astrophys 438:349–363. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052765

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogorov A (1941) The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds’ numbers. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 30:301–305

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kosugi T, Matsuzaki K, Sakao T, Shimizu T, Sone Y, Tachikawa S, Hashimoto T, Minesugi K, Ohnishi A, Yamada T, Tsuneta S, Hara H, Ichimoto K, Suematsu Y, Shimojo M, Watanabe T, Shimada S, Davis JM, Hill LD, Owens JK, Title AM, Culhane JL, Harra LK, Doschek GA, Golub L (2007) The Hinode (Solar-B) mission: an overview. Sol Phys 243:3–17. doi:10.1007/s11207-007-9014-6

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn JR, Harrington DM, Lin H, Berdyugina SV, Trujillo-Bueno J, Keil SL, Rimmele T (eds) (2011) In: Solar polarization 6. Astronomical society of the pacific conference series, vol 437

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagg A, Solanki SK, Riethmüller TL, Martínez Pillet V, Schüssler M, Hirzberger J, Feller A, Borrero JM, Schmidt W, del Toro Iniesta JC, Bonet JA, Barthol P, Berkefeld T, Domingo V, Gandorfer A, Knölker M, Title AM (2010) Fully resolved quiet-sun magnetic flux tube observed with the SUNRISE/IMAX instrument. Astrophys J Lett 723:L164–L168. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/723/2/L164

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Landi Degl’Innocenti E, Landolfi M (2004) Polarization in spectral lines. In: Astrophysics and space science library, vol 307. Kluwer Academic, Norwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Larmor J (1919) How could a rotating body such as the Sun become a magnet? Rep - Br Assoc Adv Sci 87:159–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighton RB (1969) A magneto-kinematic model of the solar cycle. Astrophys J 156:1–26. doi:10.1086/149943

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy JL, Ratier G, Bommier V (1977) The polarization of the D3 emission line in prominences. Astron Astrophys 54:811–816

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Ulrich RK (2012) Long-term measurements of sunspot magnetic tilt angles. Astrophys J 758:115. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/115

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lites BW, Kubo M, Socas-Navarro H, Berger T, Frank Z, Shine R, Tarbell T, Title A, Ichimoto K, Katsukawa Y, Tsuneta S, Suematsu Y, Shimizu T, Nagata S (2008) The horizontal magnetic flux of the quiet-Sun internetwork as observed with the Hinode spectro-polarimeter. Astrophys J 672:1237–1253. doi:10.1086/522922

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby P, Avrett EH, Carlsson M, Kjeldseth-Moe O, Kurucz RL, Loeser R (1986) A new sunspot umbral model and its variation with the solar cycle. Astrophys J 306:284. doi:10.1086/164342

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin SF, Harvey KL (1979) Ephemeral active regions during solar minimum. Sol Phys 64:93–108. doi:10.1007/BF00151118

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Moruzzi G, Strumia F (eds) (1991) The Hanle effect and level-crossing spectroscopy. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagata S, Tsuneta S, Suematsu Y, Ichimoto K, Shimizu T, Yokoyama T, Tarbell TD, Lites BW, Shine RA, Berger TE, Title AM, Bellot Rubio LR, Orozco Suárez D (2008) Formation of solar magnetic flux tubes with kilogauss field strength induced by convective instability. Astrophys J Lett 677:L145–L147. doi:10.1086/588026

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra KN, Stenflo JO (eds) (1999) In: Solar polarization 2. Astrophysics and space science library, vol 243

    Google Scholar 

  • Öhman Y (1929) Astronomical consequences of the polarization of fluorescence. Mon Not R Astron Soc 89:479–482

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Omont A, Smith EW, Cooper J (1973) Redistribution of resonance radiation. 11. The effect of magnetic fields. Astrophys J 182:283–300. doi:10.1086/152136

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Orozco Suárez D, Bellot Rubio LR, del Toro Iniesta JC, Tsuneta S, Lites BW, Ichimoto K, Katsukawa Y, Nagata S, Shimizu T, Shine RA, Suematsu Y, Tarbell TD, Title AM (2007) Quiet-Sun internetwork magnetic fields from the inversion of Hinode measurements. Astrophys J Lett 670:L61–L64. doi:10.1086/524139

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker EN (1955) Hydromagnetic dynamo models. Astrophys J 122:293. doi:10.1086/146087

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker EN (1978) Hydraulic concentration of magnetic fields in the solar photosphere. VI. Adiabatic cooling and concentration in downdrafts. Astrophys J 221:368–377. doi:10.1086/156035

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Parnell CE, DeForest CE, Hagenaar HJ, Johnston BA, Lamb DA, Welsch BT (2009) A power-law distribution of solar magnetic fields over more than five decades in flux. Astrophys J 698:75–82. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/75

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovay K, Szakaly G (1993) The origin of intranetwork fields: a small-scale solar dynamo. Astron Astrophys 274:543

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Pietarila Graham J, Danilovic S, Schüssler M (2009) Turbulent magnetic fields in the quiet Sun: implications of Hinode observations and small-scale dynamo simulations. Astrophys J 693:1728. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/1728

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Povel H (1995) Imaging Stokes polarimetry with piezoelastic modulators and charge-coupled-device image sensors. Opt Eng 34:1870–1878

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Povel HP (2001) Ground-based instrumentation for solar magnetic field studies, with special emphasis on the zurich imaging polarimeters ZIMPOL-I and II. In: Mathys G, Solanki SK, Wickramasinghe DT (eds) Magnetic fields across the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. Astronomical society of the pacific conference series, vol 248, pp 543–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson RS (1948) Sunspot groups of irregular magnetic polarity. Astrophys J 107:78–93

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer PH, Bogart RS, Bush RI, Hoeksema JT, Kosovichev AG, Schou J, Rosenberg W, Springer L, Tarbell TD, Title A, Wolfson CJ, Zayer I (MDI Engineering Team) (1995) The solar oscillations investigation—Michelson doppler imager. Sol Phys 162:129–188. doi:10.1007/BF00733429

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer PH, Schou J, Bush RI, Kosovichev AG, Bogart RS, Hoeksema JT, Liu Y, Duvall TL, Zhao J, Title AM, Schrijver CJ, Tarbell TD, Tomczyk S (2012) The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) investigation for the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). Sol Phys 275:207–227. doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9834-2

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Schou J, Scherrer PH, Bush RI, Wachter R, Couvidat S, Rabello-Soares MC, Bogart RS, Hoeksema JT, Liu Y, Duvall TL, Akin DJ, Allard BA, Miles JW, Rairden R, Shine RA, Tarbell TD, Title AM, Wolfson CJ, Elmore DF, Norton AA, Tomczyk S (2012) Design and ground calibration of the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) instrument on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). Sol Phys 275:229–259. doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9842-2

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Schrijver CJ, Harvey KL (1994) The photospheric magnetic flux budget. Sol Phys 150:1–18. doi:10.1007/BF00712873

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Schüssler M, Baumann I (2006) Modeling the Sun’s open magnetic flux. Astron Astrophys 459:945–953. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065871

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro AI, Fluri DM, Berdyugina SV, Bianda M, Ramelli R (2011) NLTE modeling of Stokes vector center-to-limb variations in the CN violet system. Astron Astrophys 529:A139. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200811299

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheeley NR Jr, DeVore CR, Boris JP (1985) Simulations of the mean solar magnetic field during sunspot cycle 21. Sol Phys 98:219–239. doi:10.1007/BF00152457

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Snik F, de Wijn AG, Ichimoto K, Fischer CE, Keller CU, Lites BW (2010) Observations of solar scattering polarization at high spatial resolution. Astron Astrophys 519:A18. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014500

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff D, Khlystova AI (2009) The solar dynamo in the light of the distribution of various sunspot magnetic classes over butterfly diagram. Astron Nachr 331:82–87. doi:10.1002/asna.200911300

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Solanki SK (1993) Small-scale solar magnetic fields—an overview. Space Sci Rev 63:1–188. doi:10.1007/BF00749277

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Spruit HC (1977) Magnetic flux tubes and transport of heat in the convection zone of the Sun. PhD thesis, Univ Utrecht

  • Spruit HC (1979) Convective collapse of flux tubes. Sol Phys 61:363–378

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Spruit HC, Zweibel EG (1979) Convective instability of thin flux tubes. Sol Phys 62:15–22

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Steenbeck M, Krause F (1969) Zur Dynamotheorie stellarer und planetarer Magnetfelder I. Berechnung sonnenähnlicher Wechselfeldgeneratoren. Astron Nachr 291:49–84

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner O (2000) The formation of asymmetric Stokes V profiles in the presence of a magnetopause. Sol Phys 196:245–268

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner O (2010) Magnetic coupling in the quiet solar atmosphere. In: Hasan SS, Rutten RJ (eds) Magnetic coupling between the interior and atmosphere of the Sun, pp 166–185. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02859-5-13

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (1970) Hale’s attempts to determine the Sun’s general magnetic field. Sol Phys 14:263–273. doi:10.1007/BF00221312

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (1971) The interpretation of magnetograph results: the formation of absorption lines in a magnetic field. In: Howard R (ed) Solar magnetic fields. IAU symposium, vol 43, pp 101–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (1973) Magnetic-field structure of the photospheric network. Sol Phys 32:41–63. doi:10.1007/BF00152728

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (1976) Small-scale solar magnetic fields. In: Bumba V, Kleczek J (eds) Basic mechanisms of solar activity. IAU symposium, vol 71, pp 69–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (1978) Resonance-line polarization. III. The Hanle effect in a compact non-LTE radiative transfer formulation. Astron Astrophys 66:241–248

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (1980) Resonance-line polarization. V. Quantum-mechanical interference between states of different total angular momentum. Astron Astrophys 84:68–74

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (1982) The Hanle effect and the diagnostics of turbulent magnetic fields in the solar atmosphere. Sol Phys 80:209–226

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (1987) Observational constraints on a ‘hidden’, turbulent magnetic field of the Sun. Sol Phys 114:1–19

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (1989) Small-scale magnetic structures on the Sun. Astron Astrophys Rev 1:3–48

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (1994a) Cycle patterns of the axisymmetric magnetic field. In: Rutten RJ, Schrijver CJ (eds) Solar surface magnetism, pp 365–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (1994b) Solar magnetic fields—polarized radiation diagnostics. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (1999) Solar magnetism and the second solar spectrum: future directions. In: Nagendra KN, Stenflo JO (eds) Polarization, astrophysics and space science library, vol 243, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (2003) Scattering polarization in magnetic fields: anomalies, surprises and enigmas. In: Trujillo Bueno J, Sánchez Almeida J (eds) Astronomical society of the pacific conference series, vol 307, pp 385–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (2004) The new world of scattering physics seen by high-precision imaging polarimetry (with 14 figures). In: Schielicke RE (ed) Reviews in modern astronomy, vol 17, pp 269–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (2010a) Distribution functions for magnetic fields on the quiet Sun. Astron Astrophys 517:A37. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913972

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (2010b) Measuring the hidden aspects of solar magnetism. In: Hasan SS, Rutten RJ (eds) Magnetic coupling between the interior and atmosphere of the Sun, pp 101–117. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02859-5-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (2011) Collapsed, uncollapsed, and hidden magnetic flux on the quiet Sun. Astron Astrophys 529:A42. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016275

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (2012a) Basal magnetic flux and the local solar dynamo. Astron Astrophys 547:A93. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219833

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (2012b) Scaling laws for magnetic fields on the quiet Sun. Astron Astrophys 541:A17. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201218939

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO (2013) Horizontal or vertical magnetic fields on the quiet Sun. Angular distributions and their height variations. Astron Astrophys 555:A132. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321608

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO, Guedel M (1988) Evolution of solar magnetic fields—modal structure. Astron Astrophys 191:137–148

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO, Keller CU (1996) New window for spectroscopy. Nature 382:588. doi:10.1038/382588a0

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO, Keller CU (1997) The second solar spectrum. A new window for diagnostics of the Sun. Astron Astrophys 321:927–934

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO, Kosovichev AG (2012) Bipolar magnetic regions on the Sun: global analysis of the SOHO/MDI data set. Astrophys J 745:129. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/745/2/129

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO, Nagendra KN (eds) (1996) In: Solar polarization 1. Solar phys, vol 164

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO, Vogel M (1986) Global resonances in the evolution of solar magnetic fields. Nature 319:285–290

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO, Twerenbold D, Harvey JW (1983a) Coherent scattering in the solar spectrum—Survey of linear polarization in the range 3165–4230 Å. Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 52:161–180

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO, Twerenbold D, Harvey JW, Brault JW (1983b) Coherent scattering in the solar spectrum—Survey of linear polarization in the range 4200–9950 Å. Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser 54:505–514

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO, Solanki S, Harvey JW, Brault JW (1984) Diagnostics of solar magnetic fluxtubes using a Fourier transform spectrometer. Astron Astrophys 131:333–346

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO, Keller CU, Gandorfer A (1998) Differential Hanle effect and the spatial variation of turbulent magnetic fields on the Sun. Astron Astrophys 329:319–328

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo JO, Demidov ML, Bianda M, Ramelli R (2013) Calibration of the 6302/6301 Stokes V line ratio in terms of the 5250/5247 ratio. Astron Astrophys 556:A113. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321749

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stepanov VE, Severny AB (1962) A photoelectric method for measurements of the magnitude and direction of the solar magnetic field. Izv Krym Astrofiz Obs 28:166–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Suematsu Y, Tsuneta S, Ichimoto K, Shimizu T, Otsubo M, Katsukawa Y, Nakagiri M, Noguchi M, Tamura T, Kato Y, Hara H, Kubo M, Mikami I, Saito H, Matsushita T, Kawaguchi N, Nakaoji T, Nagae K, Shimada S, Takeyama N, Yamamuro T (2008) The solar optical telescope of Solar-B (Hinode): the optical telescope assembly. Sol Phys 249:197–220. doi:10.1007/s11207-008-9129-4

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson MJ, Balogh A, Culhane JL, Nordlund Å, Solanki SK, Zahn JP (eds) (2009) The origin and dynamics of solar magnetism. Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0239-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Tlatov A, Illarionov E, Sokoloff D, Pipin V (2013) A new dynamo pattern revealed by the tilt angle of bipolar sunspot groups. Mon Not R Astron Soc 432:2975–2984. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt659

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Trujillo Bueno J (2001) Atomic polarization and the hanle effect. In: Sigwarth M (ed) Advanced solar polarimetry—theory, observation, and instrumentation. Astronomical society of the pacific conference series, vol 236, pp 161–195. arXiv:astro-ph/0202328

    Google Scholar 

  • Trujillo Bueno J, Sanchez Almeida J (eds) (2003) In: Solar polarization 3. Astronomical society of the pacific conference series, vol 307

    Google Scholar 

  • Trujillo Bueno J, Landi Degl’Innocenti E, Collados M, Merenda L, Manso Sainz R (2002) Selective absorption processes as the origin of puzzling spectral line polarization from the Sun. Nature 415:403–406. arXiv:astro-ph/0201409

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Trujillo Bueno J, Shchukina N, Asensio Ramos A (2004) A substantial amount of hidden magnetic energy in the quiet Sun. Nature 430:326–329. doi:10.1038/nature02669. arXiv:astro-ph/0409004

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuneta S, Ichimoto K, Katsukawa Y, Nagata S, Otsubo M, Shimizu T, Suematsu Y, Nakagiri M, Noguchi M, Tarbell T, Title A, Shine R, Rosenberg W, Hoffmann C, Jurcevich B, Kushner G, Levay M, Lites B, Elmore D, Matsushita T, Kawaguchi N, Saito H, Mikami I, Hill LD, Owens JK (2008) The solar optical telescope for the Hinode mission: an overview. Sol Phys 249:167–196. doi:10.1007/s11207-008-9174-z

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Unno W, Ando H (1979) Instability of a thin magnetic tube in the solar atmosphere. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 12:107–115. doi:10.1080/03091927908242679

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vögler A, Schüssler M (2007) A solar surface dynamo. Astron Astrophys 465:L43–L46. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077253. arXiv:astro-ph/0702681

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM, Sheeley NR Jr (1989) Average properties of bipolar magnetic regions during sunspot cycle 21. Sol Phys 124:81–100. doi:10.1007/BF00146521

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann A (1973) Computation and observation of Zeeman multiplet polarization in Fraunhofer lines. I: Photographic measurement of Stokes parameters. Sol Phys 33:107–118. doi:10.1007/BF00152383

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Zirin H (1987) Weak solar fields and their connection to the solar cycle. Sol Phys 110:101–107. doi:10.1007/BF00148205

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. O. Stenflo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stenflo, J.O. Solar magnetic fields as revealed by Stokes polarimetry. Astron Astrophys Rev 21, 66 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-013-0066-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-013-0066-3

Keywords

Navigation