Skip to main content
Log in

An improved multi-objective topology optimization model based on SIMP method for continuum structures including self-weight

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work proposes an improved topology optimization model for optimizing continuum structures with self-weight loading conditions. A modified Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP) model is proposed to avoid the parasitic effect. At the same time, the penalty factor of the SIMP model is increased to maintain the activeness of the prescribed volume constraint and to drive the design domain to binary distribution. The optimization objectives include minimizing the total strain energy of the design domain and minimizing the total displacement of the fixed domain. The shape optimization procedure is used to furtherly enhance structural performance. The whole optimization procedure is implemented with a two-dimensional model under the loading conditions of self-weight and external force. The classic MBB beam and self-weight arch are utilized to verify the proposed method, and conceptual layout designs of the steel structure bridge are conducted. It is proved that the proposed model is effective for topology optimization of continuum structures including self-weight. And it is found that the optimal structural topology is affected by the ratio of the external force to self-weight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amestoy PR, Duff IS, L'Excellent JY (2000) Multifrontal parallel distributed symmetric and unsymmetric solvers. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 184(2–4):501–520

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Amir O, Mass Y (2018) Topology optimization for staged construction. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(4):1679–1694

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ansola R, Canales J, Tárrago JA (2006) An efficient sensitivity computation strategy for the evolutionary structural optimization (ESO) of continuum structures subjected to self-weight loads. Finite Elem Anal Des 42(14–15):1220–1230

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71(2):197–224

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (1999) Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Arch Appl Mech 69(9–10):635–654

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization: theory, methods, and application. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bochenek B, Tajs-Zieli’nska K (2017) GOTICA-generation of optimal topologies by irregular cellular automata. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(6):1989–2001

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bruyneel M, Duysinx P (2005) Note on topology optimization of continuum structures including self-weight. Struct Multidiscip Optim 29(4):245–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai K, Cao J, Shi J, Liu LN, Qin QH (2016) Optimal layout of multiple bi-modulus materials. Struct Multidiscip Optim 53(4):801–811

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chang C, Chen A (2014) The gradient projection method for structural topology optimization including density-dependent force. Struct Multidiscip Optim 50(4):645–657

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng KT, Olhoff N (1981) An investigation concerning optimal design of solid elastic plates. Int J Solids Struct 17:305–323

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chiandussi G, Codegone M, Ferrero S (2009) Topology optimization with optimality criteria and transmissible loads. Comput Math Appl 57(3):772–788

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • COMSOL Multiphysics (2019) COMSOL Multiphysics Reference Manual. COMSOL®

  • Ding Y (1986) Shape optimization of structures: a literature survey. Compos Struct 24:985–1004

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eschenauer HA, Olhoff N (2001) Topology optimization of continuum structures: a review. Appl Mech Rev 54(4):331–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Félix L, Gomes AA, Suleman A (2019) Topology optimization of the internal structure of an aircraft wing subjected to self-weight load. Eng Optim 1029–0273

  • Gao T, Zhang W (2010) Topology optimization involving thermo-elastic stress loads. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42(5):725–738

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gill PE (2002) SNOPT: an SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization. SIAM J Optim 12(4):979–1006

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gill PE, Murray W, Saunders MA (2006) User's guide for SNOPT version 7: software for large-scale nonlinear programming. University of California, San Diego, Department of Mathematics

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftka RT, Grandhi RV (1985) Structural shape optimization-a survey. AIAA-85-0772, AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 26th Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Orlando, Florida

  • Huang X, Xie YM (2011) Evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures including design-dependent self-weight loads. Finite Elem Anal Des 47(8):942–948

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain N, Saxena R (2018) Effect of self-weight on topological optimization of static loading structures. Alex Engrg J 57(2):527–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee E, James KA, Martins JPRA (2012) Stress-constrained topology optimization with design-dependent loading. Struct Multidiscip Optim 46(5):647–661

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lurie KA, Cherkaev AV, Fedorov AV (1982) Regularization of optimal design problems for bars and plates. JOTA 37:499–522

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mattheck C (1989) Biological shape optimisation of mechanical components based on growth. Proceedings on the International Congress on Finite Element Method:167–176

  • Olesen LH, Okkels F, Bruus H (2006) A high-level programming language implementation of topology optimization applied to steady-state Navier-stokes flow. Int J Numer Methods Eng 65(7):975–1001

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pederson NL (2000) Maximization of eigenvalues using topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 20(1):2–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues H, Fernandes P (1995) A material-based model for topology optimization of thermoelastic structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 38(12):1951–1965

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rossow MP, Taylor JE (1973) A finite element method for the optimal design of variable thickness sheets. AIAA J 11:1566–1569

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozvany GIN (1977) Optimal plastic design: allowance for self-weight. J Eng Mech Div 103(6):1165–1170

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozvany GIN (1989) Structural design via optimality criteria. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rozvany GIN, Nakanamura H, Kuhnell BT (1980) Optimal archgrids: allowance for selfweight. Methods Appl Mech Engrg 24(3):287–304

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting. Resource Allocation, Advanced Book Program, McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stolpe M, Svanberg K (2001) An alternative interpolation scheme for minimum compliance topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 22(2):116–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes-a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24(2):359–373

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Turteltaub S, Washabaugh P (1999) Optimal distribution of material properties for an elastic continuum with structure-dependent body force. Int J Solids Struct 36(30):4587–4608

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang HY, Xie H, Liu QM, Shen YF, Wang PJ, Zhao LC (2018) Structural topology optimization of a stamping die made from high-strength steel sheet metal based on load mapping. Struct Multidiscip Optim 58(2):769–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang WM, Munro D, Wang CL, Keulen FV, Wu J (2020) Space-time topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Struct Multidiscip Optim 61:1–18

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Hu P, Zhu X, Gai Y (2016) Topology description function approach using interpolation for 3D structures with self-weight loads. Chin J Theor Appl Mech 48(6):1437–1445

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM, Wang XM, Guo DM (2003) A level set method for structural topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192(1–2):227–246

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xie YM, Steven GP (1993) A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Comput Struct 49(5):885–996

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie YM, Steven GP (1997) Evolutionary structural optimization. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu HY, Guan LW, Chen X, Wang LP (2013) Guide-weight method for topology optimization of continuum. Finite Elem Anal Des 75:38–49

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XY, Xie XM, Steven GP (2005) Evolutionary methods for topology optimization of continuous structures with design dependent loads. Comput Struct 83(12–13):956–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Liu ST, Zhang X (2009) Topology optimization of continuum structures subjected to self weight loads. Chin J Theor Appl Mech 41(1):98–104

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang WH, Zhao LY, Gao T (2017) CBS-based topology optimization including design-dependent body loads. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 322:1–22

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Houmin Li or Yicang Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Replication of results

The topology optimization model described in Section 2 is implemented in COMSOL Multiphysics 5.5 with Structure Mechanics Module, Optimization Module, and PDE Modules. The details, such as material properties, loads, boundary conditions, constraints, and objectives, for the validation case and bridge design cases have been defined in Section 3. The numerical model of this paper can be obtained from the corresponding author with a reasonable request.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Fred van Keulen

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Li, H. & Huang, Y. An improved multi-objective topology optimization model based on SIMP method for continuum structures including self-weight. Struct Multidisc Optim 63, 211–230 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02685-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02685-2

Keywords

Navigation