Abstract
The hydrodynamic prediction model improved design efficiency of the flow control application. A global sampling process with space filling method, adaptive sampling method, and neural network is proposed to generate a hydrodynamic prediction model for the flow control device. The optimized Latin hypercube sampling method is applied to create a uniform set of initial sample points for analysis. An automatic computational fluid dynamics analysis process is developed to provide data for the hydrodynamic objective of the multi-stage throttle orifice plate. By self-learning from previous sample points, the new sample points placed in the region of interest are collected by the adaptive sampling method in several iterations. Two numerical examples and the flow rate modeling for the throttle orifice plate are provided to demonstrate the approximation capability of the proposed process. Ten prediction model cases are established by a back-propagation feed-forward neural network, and the test data show that the model constructed by optimized Latin hypercube sampling and adaptive sampling has 1% mean relative error and 4.85% maximum relative error, which is nearly 25% more accurate than the optimized Latin hypercube sampling model. The proposed global sampling process is efficient to build the hydrodynamic prediction model and shows potential in the flow control design area.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aute V, Saleh K, Abdelaziz O, Azarm S, Radermacher R (2013) Cross-validation based single response adaptive design of experiments for Kriging metamodeling of deterministic computer simulations. Struct Multidiscip O 48(3):581–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0918-5
Bates S J, Sienz J, Langley D S (2003) Formulation of the Audze–Eglais uniform Latin hypercube design of experiments. Adv Eng Softw 34(8):493–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9978(03)00042-5
Bates S, Sienz J, Toropov V (2004) Formulation of the optimal Latin hypercube design of experiments using a permutation genetic algorithm. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, Structural dynamics and materials conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-2011
Bevan R L T, Poole D J, Allen C B, Rendall T C S (2017) Adaptive surrogate-based optimization of vortex generators for tiltrotor geometry. J Aircraft 54(3):1011–1024. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C033838
Cai X, Qiu H, Gao L, Yang P, Shao X (2016) An enhanced RBF-HDMR integrated with an adaptive sampling method for approximating high dimensional problems in engineering design. Struct Multidiscip O 53(6):1209–1229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1362-5
Chung I B, Park D, Choi D H (2018) Surrogate-based global optimization using an adaptive switching infill sampling criterion for expensive black-box functions. Struct Multidiscip O 57(4):1443–1459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1942-2
Corbera S, Olazagoitia J L, Lozano J A (2016) Multi-objective global optimization of a butterfly valve using genetic algorithms. Isa T 63:401–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2016.03.008
Corbera S, Olazagoitia J L, Lozano J A, Álvarez R (2017) Optimization of a butterfly valve disc using 3d topology and genetic algorithms. Struct Multidiscip O 56(4):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1694-4
Costin W J, Allen C B (2013) Numerical study of radial basis function interpolation for data transfer across discontinuous mesh interfaces. Int J Numer Meth Fl 72(10):1076–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.3778
Deschrijver D, Crombecq K, Nguyen H M, Dhaene T (2011) Adaptive sampling algorithm for macromodeling of parameterized s-parameter responses. Ieee T Microw Theory 59(1):39–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmtt.2010.2090407
Fang K T, Lin D K, Winker P, Zhang Y (2000) Uniform design: Theory and application. Technometrics 42(3):237–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2000.10486045
Fasshauer GE (2007) Meshfree approximation methods with MATLAB, vol 6, World Scientific, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1142/6437
Grosso A, Jamali A, Locatelli M (2009) Finding maximin latin hypercube designs by iterated local search heuristics. Eur J Oper Res 197(2):541–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.028
Hardy R L (1971) Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces. J Geophys Res-atmos 76(8):1905–1915. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb076i008p01905
Hu J, Zhou Q, Jiang P, Shao X, Xie T (2018) An adaptive sampling method for variable-fidelity surrogate models using improved hierarchical kriging. Eng Optimiz 50(1):145–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2017.1296435
Krishnamurthy T (2003) Response surface approximation with augmented and compactly supported radial basis functions. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, Structural dynamics, and materials conference, pp 1748. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-1748
Liefvendahl M, Stocki R (2006) A study on algorithms for optimization of latin hypercubes. J Stat Plan Inference 136(9):3231–3247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2005.01.007
Lin C, Gao F, Bai Y (2018) An intelligent sampling approach for metamodel-based multi-objective optimization with guidance of the adaptive weighted-sum method. Struct Multidiscip O 57(3):1047–1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1793-2
Liu H, Ong Y S, Cai J (2018) A survey of adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based complex engineering design. Struct Multidiscip O 57(1):393–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1739-8
Mackman T J, Allen C B (2009) Adaptive sampling for CFD data interpolation using radial basis functions. In: 27th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, pp 3515. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-3515
Mackman T J, Allen C B (2010) Multi-dimensional adaptive sampling for global Metamodelling. In: 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, pp 1418. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-1418
Mackman T J, Allen C B, Ghoreyshi M, Badcock K J (2013) Comparison of adaptive sampling methods for generation of surrogate aerodynamic models. AIAA J 51(4):797–808. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051607
Mckay M D, Beckman R J, Conover W J (1979) Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21(2):239–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2000.10485979
Nuchitprasittichai A, Cremaschi S (2013) An algorithm to determine sample sizes for optimization with artificial neural networks. Aiche J 59(3):805–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.13871
Pellegrini R, Serani A, Broglia R, Diez M, Harries S (2018) Resistance and payload optimization of a sea vehicle by adaptive multi-fidelity metamodeling. In 2018 AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, Structural dynamics, and materials conference, pp 1904
Pholdee N, Bureerat S (2015) An efficient optimum Latin hypercube sampling technique based on sequencing optimisation using simulated annealing. Int J Syst Sci 46(10):1780–1789. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2013.835003
Sacks J, Welch W J, Mitchell T J, Wynn H P (1989) Design and analysis of computer experiments. Stat Sci 4:409–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-010-0143-0
Serani A, Pellegrini R, Wackers J, Jeanson C E, Queutey P, Visonneau M, Diez M (2019) Adaptive multi-fidelity sampling for CFD-based optimisation via radial basis function metamodels. Int J Comput Fluid D 33:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618562.2019.1683164
Tang T F, Gao L L, Li B R, Liao L H, Xi Y, Yang G (2019) Cavitation optimization of a throttle orifice plate based on three-dimensional genetic algorithm and topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip O 60(3):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02249-z
Viana F A, Venter G, Balabanov V (2010) An algorithm for fast optimal Latin hypercube design of experiments. Int J Numer Meth Eng 82(2):135–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2750
Volpi S, Diez M, Gaul N J, Song H, Iemma U, Choi K K, Stern F (2015) Development and validation of a dynamic metamodel based on stochastic radial basis functions and uncertainty quantification. Struct Multidiscip O 51(2):347–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1128-5
Wendland H (2004) Scattered data approximation, vol 17. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.2277/0521843359
Wu X, Zhang W, Song S (2018) Robust aerodynamic shape design based on an adaptive stochastic optimization framework. Struct Multidiscip O 57(2):639–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1766-5
Acknowledgments
Tang Tengfei wants to thank grandfather Tong for his invaluable support over the years. Stay strong Wuhan, stay strong China.
Funding
The financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51705164, 51575199) is greatly appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Palaniappan Ramu
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Replication of results
The results data in Table 4 is proposed in the supplementary data document in 11 sections, the original data from case 1 to 7b is presented in section 1 to 10, and the test data is presented in section 11. The equation transfer OLH data to geometry data is presented in Section 2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, T., Yang, G., Zhang, D. et al. A hydrodynamic prediction model of throttle orifice plate using space filling and adaptive sampling method. Struct Multidisc Optim 62, 1563–1578 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02564-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02564-w