Skip to main content
Log in

Aeroelastic tailoring and scaling using Bacterial Foraging Optimisation

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bacterial Foraging Optimisation (BFO) is investigated in an attempt to evaluate its use in solving complex optimisation problems for aeronautical structures. A hybrid variant of BFOA, which incorporates meta-modelling techniques, is also proposed and employed. The efficiency and effectiveness of the methods are tested for tailoring a rectangular composite wing, aiming to maximise the flutter speed and for scaling a joined-wing aircraft, targeting to match aeroelastic responses between the physical prototype and wind tunnel model. The obtained results are compared with those found using a range of other biologically inspired optimisation methods (GA, PSO, ACO), proving that the social foraging behavior of motile bacteria is an effective tool for aeroelastic optimisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarons T, Canfield RA, Suleman A, Richards J (2010) Multidisciplinary design for flight test of a scaled joined wing sensorcraft. In: Proceedings of the 13rd AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis optimization conference. Fort Worth

  • Al-Obeid A, Cooper JE (1995) A Rayleigh-Ritz approach for the estimation of the dynamic properties of symmetric composite plates with general boundary conditions. Compos Sci Technol 53(3):289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisplinghoff RL, Ashley H, Halfman RL (1996) Aeroelasticity. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A, Dasgupta S, Das S, Abraham A (2007a) A synergy of differential evolution and bacterial foraging algorithm for global optimization. Int J Neural Mass-Parallel Comput Inf Syst Neural Netw World 17(6):607–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A, Dasgupta S, Das S, Abraham A (2007b) Synergy of PSO and bacterial foraging optimization: a comparative study on numerical benchmarks. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on hybrid artificial intelligent systems. ASC 44, Innovations in Hybrid Intelligent Systems, Germany, pp 255–263

  • Blair M, Canfield RA, Roberts RW (2005) Joined-wing aeroelastic design with geometric nonlinearity. J Aircr 42(4):832–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond VL, Canfield RA, Cooper JE, Blair M (2012a) Experimental nonlinear static deflections of a subscale joined wing. J Aircr 49(1):329–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond VL, Canfield RA, Suleman A, Blair M (2012b) Aeroelastic scaling of a joined wing for nonlinear geometric stiffness. AIAA J 50(3):513–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucher C (2009) Computational analysis of randomness in structural mechanics. Taylor & Francis, The Netherlands

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Zhu Y, Hu K (2009) Cooperative bacterial foraging optimization. Discret Dyn Nat Soc 2009:1–17

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chong EKP, Żak SH (2008) An introduction to optimization, 3rd edn. Wiley, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JE, Sensburg O, Miller P, Miller S (2007) Structural design and analysis of a passive load alleviation concept for a sensorcraft. Tech. Rep. EOARD Contract FA 8655-05-1-3006. University of Manchester

  • Hammersley JM (1960) Monte Carlo methods for solving multivariable problems. Ann N Y Acad Sci 86:844–874

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haupt RL, Haupt SE (2004) Practical genetic algorithms, 2nd edn. Wiley, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kameyama M, Fukunaga H (2007) Optimum design of composite wings for aeroelastic characteristics using lamination parameters. Comput Struct 85(3–4):213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH, Cho JH (2005a) Adaptive tuning of PID controller for multivariable system using bacterial foraging based optimization. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international Atlantic web intelligence conference. Vol. 3528 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Lodz, Poland, pp 231–235

  • Kim TU, Hwang IH (2005b) Optimal design of composite wing subjected to gust loads. Comput Struct 83(19–20):1546–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH, Oh SW, Lee I, Kweon JH, Choi JH (2007) Weight optimization of composite flat and curved wings satisfying both flutter and divergence constraints. Key Eng Mater 334–335:477–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroo IM, Gallman JW, Smith SC (1991) Aerodynamic and structural studies of joined wing aircraft. J Aircr 28(1):74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livne E (2001) Aeroelasticity of joined-wing airplane configurations: Past work and future challenges - a survey. In: Proceedings of the 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, AIAA 2001-1370, Seatle, doi:10.2514/6.2001-1370

  • Lophaven SN, Nielsen HB, Søndergaard J (2002) DACE - a matlab kriging toolbox - version 2.0. Tech. Rep. IMM-REP-2002-12, Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby

  • Manan A, Vio GA, Harmin YF, Cooper JE (2010) Optimization of aeroelastic composite structures using evolutionary algorithms. Eng Optim 42(2):171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller S, Vio GA, Cooper JE, Sensburg O (2008) Optimisation of a scaled sensorcraft model with passive gust alleviation. In: Proceedings of the 12nd AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis optimization conference, AIAA 2008-5875, British Columbia, Canada doi:10.2514/6.2008-5875

  • Müeller S, Marchetto J, Airaghi S, Koumoutsakos P (2002) Optimization based on bacterial chemotaxis. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(1):16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passino KM (2002) Biomimicry of bacterial foraging for distributed optimization and control. IEEE Control Syst Mag 22:52–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton E, Flick P, Donald P, Voracek D, Reichenbach E, Griffin K (2007) The x-53 a summary of the active aeroelastic wing flight research program. In: Proceedings of the 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, AIAA 2007-1855, Honolulu, Hawaii doi:10.2514/6.2007-1855

  • Pettit CL, Grandhi R (2003) Optimization of a wing structure for gust response and aileron effectiveness. J Aircr 40(6):1185–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phoenix Integration Inc. (2011) ModelCenter v10.0, Design Process Optimization Software. Blacksburg, Virginia

  • Ricciardi AP, Canfield RA, Patil MJ, Lindsley N (2012) Nonlinear aeroelastic scaling of a joined wing aircraft. In: Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, AIAA 2012-1454, Honolulu, Hawaii doi:10.2514/6.2012-1454

  • Rodden WP, Johnson EH (1994) MSC.Nastran aeroelastic analysis user’s guide v68. The MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation

  • Shirk MH, Hertz TJ, Weisshaar TA (1986) Aeroelastic tailoring - theory, practice and promise. J Aircr 23(1):6–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivanandam SN, Deepa SN (2008) Introduction to genetic algorithms. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • SWARMOPS: Matlab code (2012) htpp://www.hvass-labs.org/projects/swarmops.html

  • Weisshaar TA (1981) Aeroelastic tailoring of forward swept composite wings. J Aircr 18(8):669–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisshaar TA, Duke DK (2006) Induced drag reduction using aeroelastic tailoring with adaptive control surfaces. J Aircr 43(1):157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisshaar TA, Lee DH (2002) Aeroelastic tailoring of joined-wing configurations. In: Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, AIAA 2002-1207, Denver, doi:10.2514/6.2002-1207

  • Wolkovich J (1986) The joined wing: an overview. J Aircr 23(3):161–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright JR, Cooper JE (2007) Introduction to aircraft aeroelasticity and load. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Zona Technology Inc. (2011) ZAERO v8.5. User’s manual. Scottsdale, Arizona

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported through the Virtual Engineering Centre (VEC), which is a University of Liverpool initiative in partnership with the Northwest Aerospace Alliance, the Science and Technology Facilities Council (Daresbury Laboratory), BAE Systems, Morson Projects and Airbus (UK). The VEC is funded by the Northwest Regional Development Agency (NWDA) and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to provide a focal point for virtual engineering research, education and skills development, best practice demonstration, and knowledge transfer to the aerospace sector.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Georgiou.

Additional information

This work is dedicated to a colleague and friend, excellent scientist and engineer Idomeneas Pateros (1980–2010).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Georgiou, G., Vio, G.A. & Cooper, J.E. Aeroelastic tailoring and scaling using Bacterial Foraging Optimisation. Struct Multidisc Optim 50, 81–99 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-1033-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-1033-3

Keywords

Navigation