Skip to main content
Log in

Applied soft computing for optimum design of structures

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study a critical assessment of three metaheuristic optimization algorithms, namely differential evolution, harmony search and particle swarm optimization, is performed with reference to their efficiency and robustness for the optimum design of real-world structures. Furthermore, a neural network based prediction scheme of the structural response, required to assess the quality of each candidate design during the optimization procedure, is proposed. The proposed methodology is applied to an overhead crane structure using different finite element simulations corresponding to a solid discretization as well as mixed discretizations with shell-solid and beam-solid elements. The number of degrees of freedom (dof) resulted for the simulation of the structural response varies in the range of 60,000 to 1,400,000 dof leading to highly computational intensive problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atashpaz-Gargari E, Lucas C (2007) Imperialist competitive algorithm: an algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, Singapore, IEEE, pp 4661–4667

  • Auering JW, Troger H (1987) Time optimal control of overhead cranes with hoisting of the load. Automatica 23(4):437–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozorg Haddad O, Afshar A, Mariño MA (2005) Honey bees mating optimization algorithm (HBMO); a new heuristic approach for engineering optimization. In: Proceeding of the first international conference on modeling, simulation and applied optimization (ICMSA0/05). Sharjah, UAE, pp 1–3

  • Buffington KE (1985) Application and maintenance of radio-controlled overhead travelling cranes. Iron Steel Eng 62(12):36–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Degertekin SO, Hayalioglu MS (2010) Harmony search algorithm for minimum cost design of steel frames with semi-rigid connections and column bases. Struct Multidisc Optim 42(5):755–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirsoy M (1998) Calculation of rotation angles at the wheels produced by deflection using finite element method and the determination of motion resistances in bridge cranes. Modelling, Measurement and Control B 66(2):41–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirsoy M, Zeren E (2006) The effect of support arm condition on the displacement and stress of tower crane main frame. Modelling, Measurement and Control B 75(1–2):37–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurocode 1 (2002) Actions on structures - part 3: actions induced by cranes and machinery. ENV 1991-3: 2002, CEN European Committee for standardization, Brussels

  • Eurocode 3 (2005) Design of steel structures - part 6: Crane Supporting Structures. ENV 1993-6: 2005, CEN European Committee for standardization, Brussels

  • Fogel LJ, Owens AJ, Walsh MJ (1966) Artificial intelligence through simulated evolution. John Wiley & Sons

  • Gašić MM, Savković MM, Bulatović RR, Petrović RS (2011) Optimization of a pentagonal cross section of the truck crane boom using Lagrange’s multipliers and differential evolution algorithm. Meccanica 46(4):845–853

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan GV (2001) A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 76:60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search optimization and machine learning. Addison Wesley

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on neural networks, IV

  • Kettil P, Wiberg N-E (2002) Application of 3D solid modelling and simulation programs to a bridge structure. Eng Comput 18(2):160–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagaros ND, Karlaftis MG (2011) A critical assessment of metaheuristics for scheduling emergency infrastructure inspections. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 1(3):147–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagaros ND, Papadrakakis M (2004) Improving the condition of the Jacobian in neural network training. Adv Eng Softw 35(1):9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavi M, Fesanghary M, Damangir E (2007) An improved harmony search algorithm for solving optimization problems. Appl Math Comput 188(2):1567–1579

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mijailović R, Kastratović G (2009) Cross-section optimization of tower crane lattice boom. Meccanica 44(5):599–611

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moustafa KAF, Abou-El-Yazid TG (1996) Load sway control of overhead cranes with load hoisting via stability analysis. Int J Ser C Dyn Control, Robotics, Des Manuf 39(1):34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson A, Sandberg G, Dahlblom O (2003) On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf 25(1):47–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadrakakis M, Lagaros ND (2002) Reliability-based structural optimization using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation. Comp Meth Appl Mech Engrg 191(32):3491–3507

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen MEH (2010a) Good parameters for particle swarm optimization. Hvass Laboratories Technical Report no HL1001

  • Pedersen MEH (2010b) Good parameters for differential evolution. Hvass Laboratories Technical Report no HL1002

  • Plevris V, Papadrakakis M (2011) A hybrid particle swarm-gradient algorithm for global structural optimization. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 26(1):48–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechenberg I (1973) Evolutionsstrategie – Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution. Fromman-Holzboog

  • Riedmiller M, Braun H (1993) A direct adaptive method for faster back-propagation learning: the RPROP algorithm. In: Ruspini H (ed) Proc of the IEEE international conference on neural networks (ICNN). San Francisco, USA, pp 586–591

  • Seeßelberg C (2003) About the cross-section optimization of welded profiles of run-way beams for top mounted overhead cranes. Stahlbau 72(9):636–645

    Google Scholar 

  • SolidWorks (2010) SolidWorks Corporation, 300 Baker Avenue, Concord, MA 01742. Available from: http://www.solidworks.com/

  • Storn RM, Price KV (1997) Differential evolution - a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim 11:341–359

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y-W, Ze X-B, Luo L-W, Wang W (2010) Optimization design and analysis of LD-A type crane crossbeam. J Harbin Inst Technol 17:94–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Vu VT (2010) Minimum weight design for toroidal pressure vessels using differential evolution and particle swarm optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 42(3):351–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Li L-P (2010) An effective differential evolution with level comparison for constrained engineering design. Struct Multidisc Optim 41(6):947–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZM, Cai YJ, Miao DH (2009) A novel improved genetic algorithm and application in mechanical optimal design. Mater Sci Forum 628–629:263–268

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author has partially supported by the John Argyris Foundation. The authors would like to thank Panagiota I. Kouli who performed the numerical tests in the context of her MSc thesis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikos D. Lagaros.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lagaros, N.D., Papadrakakis, M. Applied soft computing for optimum design of structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 45, 787–799 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-011-0741-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-011-0741-9

Keywords

Navigation