Abstract
In this study a critical assessment of three metaheuristic optimization algorithms, namely differential evolution, harmony search and particle swarm optimization, is performed with reference to their efficiency and robustness for the optimum design of real-world structures. Furthermore, a neural network based prediction scheme of the structural response, required to assess the quality of each candidate design during the optimization procedure, is proposed. The proposed methodology is applied to an overhead crane structure using different finite element simulations corresponding to a solid discretization as well as mixed discretizations with shell-solid and beam-solid elements. The number of degrees of freedom (dof) resulted for the simulation of the structural response varies in the range of 60,000 to 1,400,000 dof leading to highly computational intensive problems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atashpaz-Gargari E, Lucas C (2007) Imperialist competitive algorithm: an algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, Singapore, IEEE, pp 4661–4667
Auering JW, Troger H (1987) Time optimal control of overhead cranes with hoisting of the load. Automatica 23(4):437–444
Bozorg Haddad O, Afshar A, Mariño MA (2005) Honey bees mating optimization algorithm (HBMO); a new heuristic approach for engineering optimization. In: Proceeding of the first international conference on modeling, simulation and applied optimization (ICMSA0/05). Sharjah, UAE, pp 1–3
Buffington KE (1985) Application and maintenance of radio-controlled overhead travelling cranes. Iron Steel Eng 62(12):36–38
Degertekin SO, Hayalioglu MS (2010) Harmony search algorithm for minimum cost design of steel frames with semi-rigid connections and column bases. Struct Multidisc Optim 42(5):755–768
Demirsoy M (1998) Calculation of rotation angles at the wheels produced by deflection using finite element method and the determination of motion resistances in bridge cranes. Modelling, Measurement and Control B 66(2):41–57
Demirsoy M, Zeren E (2006) The effect of support arm condition on the displacement and stress of tower crane main frame. Modelling, Measurement and Control B 75(1–2):37–59
Eurocode 1 (2002) Actions on structures - part 3: actions induced by cranes and machinery. ENV 1991-3: 2002, CEN European Committee for standardization, Brussels
Eurocode 3 (2005) Design of steel structures - part 6: Crane Supporting Structures. ENV 1993-6: 2005, CEN European Committee for standardization, Brussels
Fogel LJ, Owens AJ, Walsh MJ (1966) Artificial intelligence through simulated evolution. John Wiley & Sons
Gašić MM, Savković MM, Bulatović RR, Petrović RS (2011) Optimization of a pentagonal cross section of the truck crane boom using Lagrange’s multipliers and differential evolution algorithm. Meccanica 46(4):845–853
Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan GV (2001) A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 76:60–68
Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search optimization and machine learning. Addison Wesley
Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on neural networks, IV
Kettil P, Wiberg N-E (2002) Application of 3D solid modelling and simulation programs to a bridge structure. Eng Comput 18(2):160–169
Lagaros ND, Karlaftis MG (2011) A critical assessment of metaheuristics for scheduling emergency infrastructure inspections. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 1(3):147–163
Lagaros ND, Papadrakakis M (2004) Improving the condition of the Jacobian in neural network training. Adv Eng Softw 35(1):9–25
Mahdavi M, Fesanghary M, Damangir E (2007) An improved harmony search algorithm for solving optimization problems. Appl Math Comput 188(2):1567–1579
Mijailović R, Kastratović G (2009) Cross-section optimization of tower crane lattice boom. Meccanica 44(5):599–611
Moustafa KAF, Abou-El-Yazid TG (1996) Load sway control of overhead cranes with load hoisting via stability analysis. Int J Ser C Dyn Control, Robotics, Des Manuf 39(1):34–40
Olsson A, Sandberg G, Dahlblom O (2003) On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf 25(1):47–68
Papadrakakis M, Lagaros ND (2002) Reliability-based structural optimization using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation. Comp Meth Appl Mech Engrg 191(32):3491–3507
Pedersen MEH (2010a) Good parameters for particle swarm optimization. Hvass Laboratories Technical Report no HL1001
Pedersen MEH (2010b) Good parameters for differential evolution. Hvass Laboratories Technical Report no HL1002
Plevris V, Papadrakakis M (2011) A hybrid particle swarm-gradient algorithm for global structural optimization. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 26(1):48–68
Rechenberg I (1973) Evolutionsstrategie – Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution. Fromman-Holzboog
Riedmiller M, Braun H (1993) A direct adaptive method for faster back-propagation learning: the RPROP algorithm. In: Ruspini H (ed) Proc of the IEEE international conference on neural networks (ICNN). San Francisco, USA, pp 586–591
Seeßelberg C (2003) About the cross-section optimization of welded profiles of run-way beams for top mounted overhead cranes. Stahlbau 72(9):636–645
SolidWorks (2010) SolidWorks Corporation, 300 Baker Avenue, Concord, MA 01742. Available from: http://www.solidworks.com/
Storn RM, Price KV (1997) Differential evolution - a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim 11:341–359
Sun Y-W, Ze X-B, Luo L-W, Wang W (2010) Optimization design and analysis of LD-A type crane crossbeam. J Harbin Inst Technol 17:94–98
Vu VT (2010) Minimum weight design for toroidal pressure vessels using differential evolution and particle swarm optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 42(3):351–359
Wang L, Li L-P (2010) An effective differential evolution with level comparison for constrained engineering design. Struct Multidisc Optim 41(6):947–963
Wang ZM, Cai YJ, Miao DH (2009) A novel improved genetic algorithm and application in mechanical optimal design. Mater Sci Forum 628–629:263–268
Acknowledgements
The first author has partially supported by the John Argyris Foundation. The authors would like to thank Panagiota I. Kouli who performed the numerical tests in the context of her MSc thesis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lagaros, N.D., Papadrakakis, M. Applied soft computing for optimum design of structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 45, 787–799 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-011-0741-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-011-0741-9