Skip to main content
Log in

A general formulation of structural topology optimization for maximizing structural stiffness

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a general formulation of structural topology optimization for maximizing structure stiffness with mixed boundary conditions, i.e. with both external forces and prescribed non-zero displacement. In such formulation, the objective function is equal to work done by the given external forces minus work done by the reaction forces on prescribed non-zero displacement. When only one type of boundary condition is specified, it degenerates to the formulation of minimum structural compliance design (with external force) and maximum structural strain energy design (with prescribed non-zero displacement). However, regardless of boundary condition types, the sensitivity of such objective function with respect to artificial element density is always proportional to the negative of average strain energy density. We show that this formulation provides optimum design for both discrete and continuum structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åkesson B, Olhoff N (1988) Minimum stiffness of optimally located supports for maximum value of beam eigenfrequencies. J Sound Vib 120(3):457–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bojczuk D, Mroz Z (1998) On optimal design of supports in beam and frame structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 16(1):47–57

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Buhl T (2002) Simultaneous topology optimization of structure and supports. Struct Multidisc Optim 23(5):336–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho S, Jung HS (2003) Design sensitivity analysis and topology optimization of displacement-loaded non-linear structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192(22–24):2539–2553

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guest J, Prvost J, Belytschko T (2004) Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection functions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61(2):238–254

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hou JW, Chuang CH (1990) Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of vibrating beams with variable support locations. In: 16th automation conference, ASME transaction, DE-23-2. Chicago, pp 281–290

  • Huang X, Xie YM (2008) Topology optimization of nonlinear structures under displacement loading. Eng Struct 30(7):2057–2068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mroz Z, Rozvany G (1975) Optimal design of structures with variable support conditions. J Optim Theory Appl 15(1):85–101

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen LH, Okkels F, Bruus H (2006) A high-level programming-language implementation of topology optimization applied to steady-state navier-stokes flow. Int J Numer Methods Eng 65(7):975–1001

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen P, Pedersen NL (2009) A discussion on the application of optimality criteria for compliance with forced support displacement. In: 8th world congress on structural and multidisciplinary optimization, ISSMO. Lisbon, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen P, Pedersen NL (2010) Design objectives with forced support displacements. Struct Multidisc Optim (online)

  • Rozvany G (2009) A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 37(3):217–237

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund O (2007) Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 33(4–5):401–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund O, Petersson J (1998) Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: A survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Struct Optim 16(1):68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolpe M, Svanberg K (2001) On the trajectories of penalization methods for topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 21(2):128–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24(2):359–373

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Won KM, Park YS (1998) Optimal support positions for a structure to maximize its fundamental natural frequency. J Sound Vib 213(5):801–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Cai Y, Cheng G (2010) Volume preserving nonlinear density filter based on heaviside functions. Struct Multidisc Optim 41(4):495–505

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (90816025, 10421202). The supports are gratefully acknowledged. We thank Prof. Pauli Pedersen and Prof. Niels L. Pedersen for the stimulating and invaluable discussions, we thank Doc. Jiangs comments and suggestions for improvement of an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Niu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niu, F., Xu, S. & Cheng, G. A general formulation of structural topology optimization for maximizing structural stiffness. Struct Multidisc Optim 43, 561–572 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0585-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0585-8

Keywords

Navigation