Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A hybrid multilevel approach for aeroelastic optimization of composite wing-box

  • Industrial Application
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quest for finding optimum solutions to engineering problems has been existing for a long time. In the last decade several optimization techniques have been applied to the structural design of composite wing structures. Generally many of these proposed procedures have dealt with different disciplines such as aerodynamics, structures, or dynamics separately. However an aeronautical design process is multidisciplinary since it involves strong couplings and interactions among, for instance, aerodynamics, dynamics, flight mechanics and structures. The main problem in a multidisciplinary aircraft design is usually the development of an efficient method to integrate structures or structural properties, which can be considered both as “global” and “local” design variables. This paper describes an integrated aerodynamic / dynamic / structural optimization procedure for a composite wing-box design. The procedure combines an aeroelastic optimization of a composite wing based on a general purpose optimizer such as the Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) and a composite optimization using Genetic Algorithm (GA). Both the optimizations are implemented through a hybrid multilevel decomposition technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashton JE, Halpin JC, Petit PH (1969) Primer on composite materials: analysis. Technomic, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasbarri P, Betti F, Persiani F, Saggiani GM (1994) Static aeroelastic control of an adaptive wing. In: Proc. of ICAS 94, Anaheim, pp 589–603

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haftka RT, Gürdal Z (1992) Elements of structural optimization. Kluwer, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • He CJ, Peters DA (1992) Optimization of rotor blades for combined structural, dynamic and aerodynamic properties. Struct Optim 5(1–2):37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland J (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostreva MM, Chen X (2000) A superlinearly convergent method of feasible directions. Appl Math Comput 116(3):231–244

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kostreva MM, Chen X (2001) Asymptotic rates of convergence of SQP-type methods of feasible directions. In: Yang XQ, Teo KL, Caccetta L (eds) Optimization methods and applications. Kluwer, Boston, pp 247–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiva JP, Ghosh DK, Rastogi N (2002) A new approach in stacking sequence optimization of composite laminates using genesis structural analysis and optimization software. In: Proc. of 9th AIAA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. Atlanta, AIAA 2002-5451

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo JH, Gea HC (1998) Optimal orientation of orthotropic materials using an energy based method. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 15(3-4):230–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalewicz Z (1996) Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Potgeter H, Stander N (1998) The genetic algorithm applied to stiffness maximization of laminated plates: review and comparison. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 15(3-4):221–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Santini P, Gasbarri P (1999) Lifting surface in subsonic unsteady regime. Meccanica, International Journal of the Italian Association of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 34(1):1–27

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Santini P, Gasbarri P (2000) Structural dynamics of a cantilever wing-like anisotropic swept plate wings. J Reinf Plast Compos 19(14):1112–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santini P, Gasbarri P, Altobelli M, Rossi A (1997) A comparative overview of strain actuated surfaces’design. J Reinf Plast Compos 16(6):519–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Santini P, Sneider MA, Leuzzi L (1986) Structural dynamics of a cantilever swept wing. Aerotec Missili Spaz 65(3):141–149

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (1993) Two alternative ways for solving the coordination problem in multilevel optimization. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 6(4):205–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, James BB, Dovi AR (1985) Structural optimization by multilevel decomposition. AIAA J 23(11):1775–1782

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Spellucci P (1998) A SQP method for general nonlinear programs using only equality constrained subproblems. Math Program 82(3)413–448

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Syswerda G (1989) Uniform crossover in genetic algorithms. In: Proc. of 3rd international conference on genetic algorithms, San Mateo, pp 2–9

  • Walsh J, Young K, Pritchard JI, Adelman HM, Mantay WR (1995) Integrated aerodynamic/dynamic/ structural optimization of helicopter rotor blades using multilevel decomposition. NASA TP-3465

  • Wrenn GA, Dovi AR (1988) Multilevel decomposition approach to the preliminary sizing of a transport aircraft wing. AIAA Journal of Aircraft 25(7):632–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo D. Chiwiacowsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gasbarri, P., Chiwiacowsky, L.D. & de Campos Velho, H.F. A hybrid multilevel approach for aeroelastic optimization of composite wing-box. Struct Multidisc Optim 39, 607 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0429-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0429-6

Keywords

Navigation