Skip to main content
Log in

Topology optimization of couple-stress material structures

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional topology optimization is concerned with the structures modeled by classical theory of mechanics. Since it does not consider the effects of the microstructures of materials, the classical theory can not reveal the size effect due to material’s heterogeneity. Couple-stress theory, which takes account of the microscopic properties of the material, is capable of describing the size effect in deformations. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the formulation for topology optimization of couple-stress material structures. The artificial material density of each element is chosen as design variable. Based on the basic idea of SIMP (Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization) method, the effective material stiffness matrix of couple-stress material is related to the artificial density by power law with penalty. The structural analysis is implemented by finite element method for couple-stress materials, and a 4-noded quadrilateral couple-stress element is formulated in which C 1 continuity requirement is relaxed. Some typical problems are solved and the optimal results based on the couple-stress theory are compared with the conventional ones. It is found that the optimal topologies of couple-stress continuum show remarkable size effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adhikary DP, Guo H (2002) An orthotropic Cosserat elasto-plastic model for layered rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 35:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe MP (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Multidisc Optim 1:193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71:197–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2004) Topology optimization: theory, methods and applications. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bigoni D, Drugan WJ (2007) Analytical derivation of Cosserat moduli via homogenization of heterogeneous elastic materials. J Appl Mech 74:741–753

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyge F, Jasiuk I, Boccara S et al (2002) A micromechanically based couple-stress model of an elastic orthotropic two-phase composite. Eur J Mech A, Solids 21:465–481

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burgueno R, Quagliata MJ, Mohanty AK et al (2005) Hierarchical cellular designs for load-bearing biocomposite beams and plates. Mater Sci Eng A 390:178–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai GM, Zhang WH (2008) Size effects of basic cell in static analysis of sandwich beams. Int J Solids Struct 45:2512–2533

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eringen AC (1966) Linear theory of micropolar elasticity. J Math Mech 15:909–923

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eringen AC (1999) Microcontinuum field theories, vol 1. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatemi J, Van Keulen F, Onck PR (2002) Generalized continuum theories: application to stress analysis in bone. Meccanica 37:385–396

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fleck NA, Muller GM, Ashby MF et al (1994) Strain gradient plasticity: theory and experiment. Acta Metall Mater 42:475–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forest S, Barbe F, Cailletaud G (2000) Cosserat modelling of size effects in the mechanical behaviour of polycrystals and multi-phase materials. Int J Solids Struct 37:7105–7126

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jasiuk I, Ostoja-Starzewski M (1995) Planar Cosserat elasticity of materials with holes and intrusions. Appl Mech Rev 48:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakes RS (1986) Experimental microelasticity of two porous solids. Int J Solids Struct 22:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mindlin RD (1963) Influence of couple-stresses on stress concentrations. Exp Mech 3:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowacki W (1986) Theory of asymmetric elasticity. Pergamon, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rovati M, Veber D (2007) Optimal topologies for micropolar solids. Struct Multidisc Optim 33:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigmund O (2007) Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 33:401–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soh A-K, Chen W (2004) Finite element formulations of strain gradient theory for microstructures and the C0–1 patch test. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61:433–454

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wood RD (1988) Finite element analysis of plane couple-stress problems using first order stress functions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 26:489–509

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Sun S (2006) Scale-related topology optimization of cellular materials and structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 68:993–1011

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Wang H, Liu G (2005) Quadrilateral isoparametric finite elements for plane elastic Cosserat bodies. Acta Mech Sin 21:388–394

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng C-l, Ren M-f, Zhang Z-f et al (2004) Analysis of elastic Cosserat medium using discrete Cosserat finite elements. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics 21:377–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Zhu JZ (2005) The finite element method: its basis and fundamentals. Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shutian Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, S., Su, W. Topology optimization of couple-stress material structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 40, 319–327 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0367-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0367-3

Keywords

Navigation