Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On using genetic algorithms for optimum damper placement in space trusses

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although similar in some ways to the design of aircraft and other lightweight structures, the optimal design of space structures has several unique challenges. A flexible optimization system allowing for multiple analysis techniques and including continuous and discrete design variables is desired. Although not as computationally efficient as traditional optimization techniques, genetic algorithms meet this requirement.

The present investigation used a genetic algorithm to place passive viscous dampers in space trusses. The flexibility of the system was demonstrated through the use of fixed and free boundary conditions. The results showed that four dampers are generally sufficient to suppress bending motion in a seventy-two-bar fixed truss and a seventy-eight-bar free truss. The results were intuitive, demonstrating the suitability of the genetic algorithm to this class of problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baycan, C.M.; Utku, S.; Wada, B.K. 1992: Optimal actuator placement in adaptive precision trusses. In Proc. 33rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (held in Dallas, TX), pp. 418–423. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

  2. Bishop, J.A. 1995: A System for Optimizing Actuator Placement for Vibration Suppression in Truss Structures By Means of a Genetic Algorithm. Master’s thesis, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA

  3. Bruno, R. 1994: Identification of nonlinear joints in a truss structure. In Proc. 35-th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (Hilton Head, South Carolina). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

  4. Furuya, H.; Haftka, R.T. 1995: Combining genetic and deterministic algorithms for locating actuators on space structures. In Proc. 36-th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (held in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA), pp. 2010–2017. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

  5. Holland, J.H. 1975: Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: University of Michigan

  6. Jalihal, P.; Utku, S.; Wada, B.K. 1993: Actuator placement in prestressed adaptive trusses for vibration control. In Proc. 34-th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference (held in La Jolla, CA), pp. 3312–3318. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

  7. Mitchell, M. 1996: An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms (Complex Adaptive Systems). Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

  8. Neill, D.J.; Herendeen, D.L. 1993: ASTROS enhancements volume i – ASTROS user’s manual. Technical Report WL-TR-93-3025, Wright Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, USA

  9. Neill, D.J.; Herendeen, D.L.; Hoesly, R.L. 1993: ASTROS enhancements volume ii – ASTROS programmer’s manual. Technical Report WL-TR-93-3038, Wright Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, USA

  10. Rao, S.S.; Tan, T.-S.; Venkayya, V.B. 1990: Optimal placement of actuators in actively controlled structures using genetic algorithms. AIAA J29(6), 942–943

    Google Scholar 

  11. Whitley, D. 1993: A genetic algorithm tutorial. Technical Report CS-93-103, Computer Science Department, Colorado State University, Colorado, USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.A. Bishop.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bishop, J., Striz, A. On using genetic algorithms for optimum damper placement in space trusses. Struct Multidisc Optim 28, 136–145 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0441-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0441-9

Keywords

Navigation