Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Topological optimization of continuum structures with design-dependent surface loading – Part I: new computational approach for 2D problems

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a new computational approach for optimum topology design of 2D continuum structures subjected to design-dependent loading. Both the locations and directions of the loads may change as the structural topology changes. A robust algorithm based on a modified isoline technique is presented that generates the appropriate loading surface which remains on the boundary of potential structural domains during the topology evolution. Issues in connection with tracing the variable loading surface are discussed and treated in the paper. Our study indicates that the influence of the variation of element material density is confined within a small neighbourhood of the element. With this fact in mind, the cost of the calculation of the sensitivities of loads may be reduced remarkably. Minimum compliance is considered as the design problem. There are several models available for such designs. In the present paper, a simple formulation with weighted unit cost constraints based on the expression of potential energy is employed. Compared to the traditional models (i.e., the SIMP model), it provides an alternative way to implement the topology design of continuum structures. Some 2D examples are tested to show the differences between the designs obtained for fixed, design-independent loading, and for variable, design-dependent loading. The general and special features of the optimization with design-dependent loads are shown in the paper, and the validity of the algorithm is verified. An algorithm dealing with 3D design problems is described in Part II, which is developed from the 2D algorithm in the present Part I of the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bendsøe, M.P.; Kikuchi, N. 1988: Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71(2), 197–224

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bendsøe, M.P. 1989: Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim 1, 193–202

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bendsøe, M.P.; Guedes, J.M.; Haber, R.B.; Pedersen, P.; Taylor, J.E. 1994: An analytical model to predict optimal material properties in the context of optimal structural design. J Appl Mech 61(4), 930–937

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bendsøe, M.P.; Diaz, A.R.; Lipton, R.; Taylor, J.E. 1995: Optimal design of material properties and material distribution for multiple loading conditions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 38, 1149–1170

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bendsøe, M.P.; Sigmund, O. 1999: Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Arch Appl Mech 69, 635–654

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bendsøe, M.P.; Sigmund, O. 2003: Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer

  7. Bourdin, B.; Chambolle, A. 2001: Design-dependent loads in topology optimization. Report, Cahiers du CEREMADE No. 01-21, 2001, Université de Paris-Dauphine, France

  8. Burden, R.; Faires, J. 1985: Numerical Analysis. 3rd ed., Boston: Prindle, Weber and Schmidt

  9. Chen, B.; Kikuchi, N. 2001: Topology optimization with design-dependent loads. Finite Elem Anal Des 37, 57–70

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng, G.; Olhoff, N. 1982: Regularized formulation for optimal design of axisymmetric plates. Int J Solids Struct 18, 153–169

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cherkaev, A. 2000: Variational Methods for Structural Optimization. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer

  12. Du, J. 2001: An approach to computational solution for the optimal design of materials and topology of 2D and 3D continuum structures. In: Proc. WCSMO-4, Fourth World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (held in Dalian, China, 4–8 June 2001)

  13. Du, J.; Taylor, J.E. 2002: Application of an energy-based model for the optimal design of structural materials and topology. Struct Multidisc Optim 24, 277–292

    Google Scholar 

  14. Du, J.; Olhoff, N. 2004 (in press): Topological optimization of continuum structures with design-dependent surface loading – Part II: algorithm and examples for 3D problems. Struct Multidisc Optim. DOI 10.1007/s00158-004-0380-5

  15. Eschenauer, H.; Olhoff, N. 2001: Topology optimization of continuum structures: A review. Appl Mech Rev 54(4) 331–389

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guedes, J.M.; Taylor, J.E. 1997: On the prediction of material properties and topology for optimal continuum structures. Struct Optim 14, 193–199

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hammer, V.B.; Olhoff, N. 1999: Topology optimization with design dependent loads. In: Proc. WCSMO-3, Third World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (held in Buffalo, NY, May 17–21, 1999). State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York

  18. Hammer, V.B.; Olhoff, N. 2000: Topology optimization of continuum structures subjected to pressure loading. Struct Multidisc Optim 19(2), 85–92

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maute, K.; Ramm, E. 1995: Adaptive topology optimization. Struct Optim 10, 100–112

    Google Scholar 

  20. Olhoff, N.; Rønholt E.; Scheel, J. 1998: Topology optimization of three-dimensional structures using optimum microstructures. Struct Optim 16(1), 001–018

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rodrigues, H; Soto, C.A.; Taylor, J.E. 1999: A design model to predict optimal two-material composite structures. Struct Optim 17, 186–198

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rozvany, G.I.N.; Zhou, M. 1991: Applications of the COC method in layout optimization. In: Eschenauer, H.; Mattheck, C.; Olhoff, N. (eds.), Proc. Int. Conf. on Engineering Optimization in Design Processes (held in Karlsruhe, 1990), pp. 59–70, Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer

  23. Rozvany, G.I.N.; Zhou, M.; Birker, T. 1992: Generalized shape optimization without homogenization. Struct Optim 4, 250–252

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rozvany, G.I.N.; Bendsøe, M.P.; Kirsch, U. 1995: Layout optimization of structures. Appl Mech Rev 45, 41–119

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rozvany, G.I.N.; Olhoff, N. (eds.), Proc. NATO ARW on Topology Optimization of Structures and Composite Continua (Budapest, 2000), Dordrecht: Kluwer

  26. Sigmund, O. 2000: A 99 line topology optimization code written in matlab. Struct Optim 21(2), 120–127

    Google Scholar 

  27. Taylor, J.E.; Washabaugh, P.D. 1995: A generalized expression of cost for prediction of the optimal material properties tensor. Proc. Summaries, ASME Summer Mechanics Meeting (held at UCLA)

  28. Taylor, J.E. 1998: An energy model for the optimal design of linear continuum structures. Struct Optim 16(2–3), 116–127

    Google Scholar 

  29. Taylor, J.E. 2000: Addendum to: An energy model for the optimal design of linear continuum structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 19(4), 317–320

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg East, DK-9220, Denmark

    J. Du & N. Olhoff

Authors
  1. J. Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Olhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Olhoff .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Du, J., Olhoff , N. Topological optimization of continuum structures with design-dependent surface loading – Part I: new computational approach for 2D problems. Struct Multidisc Optim 27, 151–165 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0379-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0379-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation