Skip to main content
Log in

The joint embedding property and maximal models

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We introduce the notion of a ‘pure’ Abstract Elementary Class to block trivial counterexamples. We study classes of models of bipartite graphs and show: Main Theorem (cf. Theorem 3.34 and Corollary 3.38): If \(\langle \lambda _i: i\le \alpha <\aleph _1\rangle \) is a strictly increasing sequence of characterizable cardinals (Definition 2.1) whose models satisfy JEP\((<\lambda _0)\), there is an \(L_{\omega _1,\omega }\)-sentence \(\psi \) whose models form a pure AEC and

  1. (1)

    The models of \(\psi \) satisfy JEP\((<\lambda _0)\), while JEP fails for all larger cardinals and AP fails in all infinite cardinals.

  2. (2)

    There exist \(2^{\lambda _i^+}\) non-isomorphic maximal models of \(\psi \) in \(\lambda _i^+\), for all \(i\le \alpha \), but no maximal models in any other cardinality; and

  3. (3)

    \(\psi \) has arbitrarily large models.

In particular this shows the Hanf number for JEP and the Hanf number for maximality for pure AEC with Löwenheim number \(\aleph _0\) are at least \(\beth _{\omega _1}\). We show that although \(AP(\kappa )\) for each \(\kappa \) implies the full amalgamation property, \(JEP(\kappa )\) for each \(\kappa \) does not imply the full joint embedding property. We prove the main combinatorial device of this paper cannot be used to extend the main theorem to a complete sentence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baldwin, J.T.: Categoricity. Number 51 in University Lecture Notes. American Mathematical Society, Providence, USA. www.math.uic.edu/~jbaldwin (2009)

  2. Baldwin, J.T., Boney, W.: Hanf numbers and presentation theorems in AECs. arXiv:1511.02935

  3. Baldwin, J.T., Friedman, S.D., Koerwien, M., Laskowski, M.C.: Three red herrings around Vaught’s conjecture. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 368, 3673–3694 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Baldwin, J.T., Hyttinen, T., Kesälä, M.: Beyond first order logic: from number of structures to structure of numbers part I. Bulletin of Iranian Mathematical Society. http://www.iranjournals.ir/ims/bulletin/ (2011, in press)

  5. Baldwin, J.T., Hyttinen, T., Kesälä, M.: Beyond first order logic: from number of structures to structure of numbers part II. Bulletin of Iranian Mathematical Society. http://www.iranjournals.ir/ims/bulletin/ (2011, in press)

  6. Baldwin, J.T., Koerwien, M., Laskowski, M.C.: Amalgamation, characterizing cardinals and locally finite abstract elementary classes. http://homepages.math.uic.edu/~jbaldwin/pub/LS-2014-03-10jb.pdf (2014, preprint)

  7. Boney, W.: Tameness from large cardinal axioms. J. Symb. Log. 79(4), 1092–1119 (2014). doi:10.1017/jsl.2014.30

  8. Grossberg, R.: Classification theory for non-elementary classes. In: Yi, Z. (ed.) Logic and Algebra, pp. 165–204. AMS, New York (2002). (Contemporary Mathematics 302)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Grossberg, R., VanDieren, M.: Shelah’s categoricity conjecture from a successor for tame abstract elementary classes. J. Symb. Log. 71, 553–568 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kolesnikov, A., Lambie-Hanson, C.: Hanf numbers for amalgamation of coloring classes (2014, preprint). arXiv:1409.2508

  11. Morley, M.: Omitting classes of elements. In: Addison, J.W., Henkin, L., Tarski, A. (eds.) The Theory of Models, pp. 265–273. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shelah, S.: Classification of nonelementary classes II, abstract elementary classes. In J.T. Baldwin, (ed.) Classification Theory (Chicago, IL, 1985), pp. 419–497. Springer, Berlin (1987). Paper 88: Proceedings of the USA–Israel Conference on Classification Theory, Chicago, December 1985; volume 1292 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics

  13. Shelah, S.: Universal classes, part I. In Baldwin, J.T. (ed.) Classification Theory (Chicago, IL, 1985), pp. 264–419. Springer, Berlin (1987). Paper 300: Proceedings of the USA–Israel Conference on Classification Theory, Chicago, December 1985; volume 1292 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics

  14. Shelah, S.: Categoricity for abstract classes with amalgamation. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 98, 261–294 (1999). Paper 394. Consult Shelah for post-publication revisions

  15. Shelah, S.: Classification Theory for Abstract Elementary Classes. Studies in Logic. College Publications. www.collegepublications.co.uk (2009). Binds together papers 88r, 600, 705, 734 with introduction E53

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis Souldatos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baldwin, J.T., Koerwien, M. & Souldatos, I. The joint embedding property and maximal models. Arch. Math. Logic 55, 545–565 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-016-0480-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-016-0480-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation