Skip to main content
Log in

The large cardinals between supercompact and almost-huge

  • Published:
Archive for Mathematical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I analyze the hierarchy of large cardinals between a supercompact cardinal and an almost-huge cardinal. Many of these cardinals are defined by modifying the definition of a high-jump cardinal. A high-jump cardinal is defined as the critical point of an elementary embedding \({j: V \to M}\) such that M is closed under sequences of length \({\sup\{{j(f)(\kappa)\,|\,f: \kappa \to \kappa}\}}\). Some of the other cardinals analyzed include the super-high-jump cardinals, almost-high-jump cardinals, Shelah-for-supercompactness cardinals, Woodin-for-supercompactness cardinals, Vopěnka cardinals, hypercompact cardinals, and enhanced supercompact cardinals. I organize these cardinals in terms of consistency strength and implicational strength. I also analyze the superstrong cardinals, which are weaker than supercompact cardinals but are related to high-jump cardinals. Among the results, I highlight the following.

  • Vopěnka cardinals are the same as Woodin-for-supercompactness cardinals.

  • There are no excessively hypercompact cardinals.

Furthermore, I prove some results relating high-jump cardinals to forcing, as well as analyzing Laver functions for super-high-jump cardinals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Apter A.W.: Reducing the consistency strength of an indestructibility theorem. Math. Log. Q. 54(3), 288–293 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Apter A.W.: Some applications of Sargsyan’s equiconsistency method. Fund. Math. 216(3), 207–222 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Apter A.W., Hamkins J.D.: Universal indestructibility. Kobe J. Math. 16(2), 119–130 (1999)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Apter A.W., Sargsyan G.: A reduction in consistency strength for universal indestructibility. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Math. 55(1), 1–6 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Apter A.W., Sargsyan G.: An equiconsistency for universal indestructibility. J. Symb. Log. 75(1), 314–322 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bagaria J.: \({{C}^{(n)}}\) -cardinals. Arch. Math. Log. 51(3–4), 213–240 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bagaria, J., Tsaprounis, K., Hamkins J.D., Usuba, T.: Superstrong and other large cardinals are never Laver indestructible. Preprint. http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.3486

  8. Barbanel J.B., Diprisco C.A., Tan I.B.: Many-times huge and superhuge cardinals. J. Symb. Log. 49(1), 112–122 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Cummings, J.: Iterated forcing and elementary embeddings. In: Handbook of Set Theory, vol. 2. pp. 775–884. Springer, Berlin (2010)

  10. Foreman, M.: Generic elementary embeddings, lecture 3. Appalachian Set Theory, June 2007. http://www.math.cmu.edu/~eschimme/Appalachian/Foreman.html. Accessed 19 Dec 2012

  11. Fuchs G.: Combined maximality principles up to large cardinals. J. Symb. Log. 74(3), 1015–1046 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamkins J.D.: Tall cardinals. Math. Log. Q. 55(1), 68–86 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamkins, J.D.: Forcing and large cardinals. book manuscript in preparation

  14. Hamkins J.D.: Canonical seeds and Prikry trees. J. Symbol. Log. 62(2), 373–396 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamkins J.D.: Destruction or preservation as you like it. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 91(2–3), 191–229 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamkins J.D.: Extensions with the approximation and cover properties have no new large cardinals. Fund. Math. 180(3), 257–277 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamkins, J.D., Shelah, S.: Superdestructibility: a dual to Laver’s indestructibility. J. Symb. Log. 63(2), 549–554 (1998) [HmSh:618]

  18. Jech, T.: Set Theory. Springer Monographs in Mathematics, 3rd edn. (2003)

  19. Kanamori A.: The Higher Infinite, Corrected Second Edition. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Laver, R.: Making the supercompactness of \({\kappa}\) indestructible under \({\kappa}\)-directed closed forcing. Israel J. Math. 29(4), 385–388 (1978)

  21. Lubarsky, R.S., Perlmutter, N.L.: On extensions of supercompactness. Math. Log. Q. To appear. Preprint. http://boolesrings.org/perlmutter/files/2014/06/hyp-and-enh-scs-June2014.pdf

  22. Perlmutter, N.L.: Inverse limits of models of set theory and the large cardinal hierarchy near a high-jump cardinal. PhD dissertation, CUNY Graduate Center, Department of Mathematics, May 2013. http://boolesrings.org/perlmutter/files/2013/05/Dissertation.pdf

  23. Shelah S., Woodin W.H.: Large cardinals imply that every reasonably definable set of reals is Lebesgue measurable. Israel J. Math. 70(3), 381–394 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Solovay R.M., Reinhardt W.N., Kanamori A.: Strong axioms of infinity and elementary embeddings. Ann. Math. Log. 13(1), 73–116 (1978)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Suzuki T.: Witnessing numbers of Shelah cardinals. Math. Log. Q. 39(1), 62–66 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norman Lewis Perlmutter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perlmutter, N.L. The large cardinals between supercompact and almost-huge. Arch. Math. Logic 54, 257–289 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-014-0410-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-014-0410-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation