Abstract
I analyze the hierarchy of large cardinals between a supercompact cardinal and an almost-huge cardinal. Many of these cardinals are defined by modifying the definition of a high-jump cardinal. A high-jump cardinal is defined as the critical point of an elementary embedding \({j: V \to M}\) such that M is closed under sequences of length \({\sup\{{j(f)(\kappa)\,|\,f: \kappa \to \kappa}\}}\). Some of the other cardinals analyzed include the super-high-jump cardinals, almost-high-jump cardinals, Shelah-for-supercompactness cardinals, Woodin-for-supercompactness cardinals, Vopěnka cardinals, hypercompact cardinals, and enhanced supercompact cardinals. I organize these cardinals in terms of consistency strength and implicational strength. I also analyze the superstrong cardinals, which are weaker than supercompact cardinals but are related to high-jump cardinals. Among the results, I highlight the following.
-
Vopěnka cardinals are the same as Woodin-for-supercompactness cardinals.
-
There are no excessively hypercompact cardinals.
Furthermore, I prove some results relating high-jump cardinals to forcing, as well as analyzing Laver functions for super-high-jump cardinals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apter A.W.: Reducing the consistency strength of an indestructibility theorem. Math. Log. Q. 54(3), 288–293 (2008)
Apter A.W.: Some applications of Sargsyan’s equiconsistency method. Fund. Math. 216(3), 207–222 (2012)
Apter A.W., Hamkins J.D.: Universal indestructibility. Kobe J. Math. 16(2), 119–130 (1999)
Apter A.W., Sargsyan G.: A reduction in consistency strength for universal indestructibility. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Math. 55(1), 1–6 (2007)
Apter A.W., Sargsyan G.: An equiconsistency for universal indestructibility. J. Symb. Log. 75(1), 314–322 (2010)
Bagaria J.: \({{C}^{(n)}}\) -cardinals. Arch. Math. Log. 51(3–4), 213–240 (2012)
Bagaria, J., Tsaprounis, K., Hamkins J.D., Usuba, T.: Superstrong and other large cardinals are never Laver indestructible. Preprint. http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.3486
Barbanel J.B., Diprisco C.A., Tan I.B.: Many-times huge and superhuge cardinals. J. Symb. Log. 49(1), 112–122 (1984)
Cummings, J.: Iterated forcing and elementary embeddings. In: Handbook of Set Theory, vol. 2. pp. 775–884. Springer, Berlin (2010)
Foreman, M.: Generic elementary embeddings, lecture 3. Appalachian Set Theory, June 2007. http://www.math.cmu.edu/~eschimme/Appalachian/Foreman.html. Accessed 19 Dec 2012
Fuchs G.: Combined maximality principles up to large cardinals. J. Symb. Log. 74(3), 1015–1046 (2009)
Hamkins J.D.: Tall cardinals. Math. Log. Q. 55(1), 68–86 (2009)
Hamkins, J.D.: Forcing and large cardinals. book manuscript in preparation
Hamkins J.D.: Canonical seeds and Prikry trees. J. Symbol. Log. 62(2), 373–396 (1997)
Hamkins J.D.: Destruction or preservation as you like it. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 91(2–3), 191–229 (1998)
Hamkins J.D.: Extensions with the approximation and cover properties have no new large cardinals. Fund. Math. 180(3), 257–277 (2003)
Hamkins, J.D., Shelah, S.: Superdestructibility: a dual to Laver’s indestructibility. J. Symb. Log. 63(2), 549–554 (1998) [HmSh:618]
Jech, T.: Set Theory. Springer Monographs in Mathematics, 3rd edn. (2003)
Kanamori A.: The Higher Infinite, Corrected Second Edition. Springer, Berlin (2004)
Laver, R.: Making the supercompactness of \({\kappa}\) indestructible under \({\kappa}\)-directed closed forcing. Israel J. Math. 29(4), 385–388 (1978)
Lubarsky, R.S., Perlmutter, N.L.: On extensions of supercompactness. Math. Log. Q. To appear. Preprint. http://boolesrings.org/perlmutter/files/2014/06/hyp-and-enh-scs-June2014.pdf
Perlmutter, N.L.: Inverse limits of models of set theory and the large cardinal hierarchy near a high-jump cardinal. PhD dissertation, CUNY Graduate Center, Department of Mathematics, May 2013. http://boolesrings.org/perlmutter/files/2013/05/Dissertation.pdf
Shelah S., Woodin W.H.: Large cardinals imply that every reasonably definable set of reals is Lebesgue measurable. Israel J. Math. 70(3), 381–394 (1990)
Solovay R.M., Reinhardt W.N., Kanamori A.: Strong axioms of infinity and elementary embeddings. Ann. Math. Log. 13(1), 73–116 (1978)
Suzuki T.: Witnessing numbers of Shelah cardinals. Math. Log. Q. 39(1), 62–66 (1993)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perlmutter, N.L. The large cardinals between supercompact and almost-huge. Arch. Math. Logic 54, 257–289 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-014-0410-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-014-0410-y
Keywords
- High-jump cardinals
- Vopěnka cardinals
- Woodin-for-supercompactness cardinals
- Hypercompact cardinals
- Forcing and large cardinals
- Laver functions