Skip to main content
Log in

Reducing the excess burden of subsidizing the stork: joint taxation, individual taxation, and family tax splitting

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Population Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analyzing a homogenous household setting with endogenous fertility and endogenous labor supply, we demonstrate that moving from joint taxation to individual taxation and adapting child benefits so as to keep fertility constant entails a Pareto improvement. The change is associated with an increase in labor supply and consumption and a reduction of the marginal income tax, while the child benefit may move in either direction. Similarly, a move from joint taxation to some scheme of family tax splitting increases labor supply and welfare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apps P, Rees R (1999) Individual versus joint taxation in models with household production. J Polit Econ 107(2):393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apps P, Rees R (2004) Fertility, taxation and family policy. Scand J Econ 106(4):745–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apps P, Rees R (2011) Optimal taxation and tax reform for two-earner households. CESifo Econ Stud 57(2):283–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balestrino A (2001) On the optimal fiscal treatment of family size. Finanzarchiv 58(2):140–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balestrino A, Cigno A, Pettini A (2002) Endogenous fertility and the design of family taxation. Int Tax Public Financ 9(2):175–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beblo M, Beninger D, Laisney F (2004) Family tax splitting: a microsimulation of its potential labour supply and intra-household welfare effects in Germany. Appl Econ Q 50(3):233–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Boskin M, Sheshinski E (1983) Optimal tax treatment of the family: married couples. J Public Econ 20(3):281–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett C (2007) Optimal nonlinear taxes for families. Int Tax Public Financ 14(3):225–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigno A (1983) On optimal family allowances. Oxf Econ Pap 35(1):13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigno A (1986) Fertility and the tax-benefit system: a reconsideration of the theory of family taxation. Econ J 96(384):1035–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigno A (2009) What’s the use of marriage? IZA discussion paper no. 4635, Bonn

  • Cigno A, Pettini A (2002) Taxing family size and subsidizing child-specific commodities? J Public Econ 84(1):75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigno A, Luporini A, Pettini A (2003) Transfers to families with children as a principal-agent problem. J Public Econ 87(5–6):1165–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremer H, Dellis A, Pestieau P (2003) Family size and optimal income taxation. J Popul Econ 16(1):37–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers M, De Mooij R, Van Vuuren D (2008) The wage elasticity of labour supply: a synthesis of empirical estimates. De Economist 156(1):25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein M, Feenberg DR (1996) The taxation of two-earner families. In: Feldstein M, Poterba JM (eds) Empirical foundations of household taxation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 39–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser CD (2001) Income risk, the tax-benefit system and the demand for children. Economica 68(269):105–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immervoll H, Kleven HJ, Kreiner CT, Verdelin N (2011) Optimal tax and transfer programs for couples with extensive labor supply responses. J Public Econ 95(11–12):1485–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleven HJ, Kreiner CT (2007) Optimal taxation of married couples with household production. Finanzarchiv 63(4):498–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleven HJ, Kreiner CT, Saez E (2009) The optimal income taxation of couples. Econometrica 77(2):537–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier V, Rainer H (2010) On the optimality of joint taxation for non-cooperative couples. CESifo working paper no. 3128, Munich

  • Pencavel J (1986) Labor supply of men: a survey. In: Ashenfelter O, Layard R (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–102

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Piggott J, Whalley J (1996) The tax unit and household production. J Polit Econ 104(2):398–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner V, Wrohlich K (2008) Introducing family tax splitting in Germany: how would it affect the income distribution, work incentives, and household welfare? Finanzarchiv 64(1):115–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank two anonymous referees and participants at conferences and seminars at Bamberg, Barcelona, Copenhagen, Essen, Galway, Munich, Tallinn, and Vienna for many valuable and useful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volker Meier.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Alessandro Cigno

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 267 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meier, V., Wrede, M. Reducing the excess burden of subsidizing the stork: joint taxation, individual taxation, and family tax splitting. J Popul Econ 26, 1195–1207 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-011-0400-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-011-0400-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation