Skip to main content
Log in

Technologies, culture, work, basic income and maximum income

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radical changes of our cultural values in the near future are inevitable, since the current culture is ecologically unsustainable. The present proposal, radical as it may seem to some, is accordingly offered as worthy of consideration. The main section of this article is on a proposed scheme, named Asset and Income Limits, for instituting maxima to the legitimate incomes and assets of individuals. This scheme involves every individual being associated with two bank accounts, an asset account (their own property) and a holding account (held in escrow). Other parts of the advocated change in economic landscape are a radically different understanding of the concept of work and the introduction of a basic income. The roles of technology and culture, in creating both the opportunities and the obstacles to a transformation of society, are discussed. Non-monetary, non-convertible rewards for exceptional contributions to society are described. The scheme enhances freedom, being neutral in relation to many other value systems, such as the secular/sacred spectrum. The qualitative versus quantitative dichotomy is addressed, and it is concluded that the most that can be said of a just and sustainable society that has yet to be created is that the maximum income should be no more than one order of magnitude greater than the basic income, that is ~10 times at the most. Incentives for profitable employment would still be sufficient, and paying the basic income out of taxes on sales and/or non-basic income would be feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman B, Alstott A, van Parijs P (2006) Redesigning distribution: basic income and stakeholder grants as alternative cornerstones for a more egalitarian capitalism. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Albright D (ed) (1992) W B Yeats: the poems. Dent, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson AB (1995) Public economics in action: the basic income/flat tax proposal. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber BR (2008) Con$Umed: how markets corrupt children, infantilize adults, and swallow citizens whole. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett R, Maxwell N (2008) Wisdom in the university. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Battersby S, Else L, George A, Norton MI, Pearce F, Rogers D (2012) The age of inequality. New Sci 215(2875):37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beddington J (2009) The perfect storm. Government Office for Science. http://www.bis.gov.uk/go-science/news/speeches/the-perfect-storm. Accessed 13 Sept 2012

  • Brown D (2002) Insatiable is not sustainable. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke G, Rumberger RW (eds) (1987) The future impact of technology on work and education. Falmer Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Citizen’s Income Trust (no date) http://www.citizensincome.org (Contains much downloadable material). Accessed 13 Sept 2012

  • Collins C (2012) 99 to 1: how wealth inequality is wrecking the world and what we can do about it. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottey A (2012) Logarithmic time: its role in current culture and education. Policy Futures Educ 10(2):234–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottey A (no date) Asset and income limits. http://www.uea.ac.uk/~c013/ail/ail.html. Accessed 13 Sept 2012

  • Daly H (no date) Eight fallacies about growth. http://steadystate.org/eight-fallacies-about-growth/. Accessed 13 Sept 2012

  • de Angelis M (2007) The beginning of history: value struggles and global capital. Pluto, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolšak N, Ostrom E (2003) The commons in the new millennium: challenges and adaptations. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Douthwaite R (1999) The ecology of money. Green Books, Totnes

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchrow U, Hinkelammert FJ (2004) Property for people, not for profit. Zed Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels F (1969) The condition of the working class in England: from personal observations and authentic sources. (With an introduction by E Hobsbawm.) Panther, St Albans, UK. First published, in German, 1845. Many other editions exist including from Project Gutenberg. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/17306

  • Engler A (1995) Apostles of greed: capitalism and the myth of the individual in the market. Pluto, London

    Google Scholar 

  • English JF (2005) The economy of prestige: prizes, awards, and the circulation of cultural value. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes (no date) The world’s billionaires. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/billionaires. Accessed 13 Sept 2012

  • Giedion S (1948) Mechanization takes command: a contribution to anonymous history. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE global history network (no date). Obituary of Harold Chestnut. http://www.ieeeghn.org/wiki/index.php/Harold_Chestnut. Accessed 13 Sept 2012

  • Johnstone C (no date) Great turning times. http://greatturningtimes.org. Accessed 13 Sept 2012

  • Kempf H (2008) How the rich are destroying the earth. Green Books, Totnes

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten DC (2001) When corporations rule the world, 2nd edn. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten DC (2006) The great turning: from empire to earth community. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke J (1690) Second treatise of government. Project Gutenberg. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7370. Accessed 13 Sept 2012

  • Macpherson CB (1962) The political theory of possessive individualism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy J, Brown MY (1998) Coming back to life: practices to reconnect our lives, our world. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy R (2011) The courageous state: rethinking economics, society and the role of government. Searching Finance, London

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly T (2003) Open source paradigm shift. http://oreilly.com/tim/articles/paradigmshift_0504.html. Accessed 13 Sept 2012

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pagel M (2012) Wired for culture: the natural history of human cooperation. Allen Lane, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzigati S (1992) The maximum wage: a common-sense prescription for revitalizing America—by taxing the very rich. Apex, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzigati S (2004) Greed and good: understanding and overcoming the inequality that limits our lives. Apex, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Poteete AR, Janssen MA, Ostrom E (2010) Working together: collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Raventós D (2007) Basic income: the material conditions of freedom. Pluto, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin J (2000) The age of access: the new culture of hypercapitalism, where all of life is a paid-for experience. Tarcher/Putnam, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin J (2004) The end of work: the decline of the global labor force and the dawn of the post-market era. Revised edition. Tarcher/Penguin, New York

  • Roberts K (1982) Automation, unemployment and the distribution of income. European Centre for Work and Society, Maastricht

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson I (2012) The ultimate high. New Sci 215(2872):28–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russett B, Starr H (1989) World politics: the menu for choice, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel MJ (2012) What money can’t buy: the moral limits of markets. Allen Lane, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter T (1989) Basic income: freedom from poverty, freedom to work. Marion Boyars, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges with thanks comments from T. Belton, D. Iseli, K. Lam, P. Lanyon, P. Le Mare, J. Nelson, F. Oeser, P. Pickbourne and M. Torry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Cottey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cottey, A. Technologies, culture, work, basic income and maximum income. AI & Soc 29, 249–257 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0480-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0480-0

Keywords

Navigation