Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of air tonometry with gastric tonometry using saline and other equilibrating fluids: an in vivo and in vitro study

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

1) To compare saline gastric tonometry monitoring with air tonometry (Tonocap) in a group of general ICU patients. 2) An in vitro investigation of the performance of other fluids used in gastric tonometry and to assess the effects of variation of temperature and carbon dioxide concentration within the range encountered in clinical use.

Design

a) A prospective, observational study in ICU patients b) A comparative laboratory study.

Setting

The general Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and the laboratory at Leeds General Infirmary.

Patients and participants

Nine patients in the general ICU with severe sepsis or septic shock.

Measurements and results

In vivo comparison of saline and air tonometry demonstrated a difference between the two techniques. Bland & Altman analysis showed a mean bias in the measurement of gastric PCO2 of 1.88 kPa with a precision of 1.22 kPa, with saline giving the lower result. In vitro, saline, air (Tonocap), gelatin and heparinised blood were used, at temperatures of 33–42 °C and at carbon dioxide concentrations of 4–8 kPa. While gelatin and blood gave unpredictable results, dependent on temperature and carbon dioxide concentration, air tonometry gave highly reproducible results. A consistent bias between the results with saline and air tonometry was seen over the range of temperatures and carbon dioxide (Co2) concentrations studied. The mean bias was 0.85 kPa with a precision of 0.40 kPa, saline consistently giving lower results.

Conclusions

There are clinically significant differences in values for gastric mucosal PCO2 measured by air tonometry and saline tonometry both in vivo and in vitro.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mythen MG, Webb AR (1994) The role of gut mucosal hypoperfusion in the pathogenesis of post-operative organ dysfunction. Intensive Care Med 20: 203–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gutierrez G, Brown SD (1995) Gastric Tonometry: A new monitoring modality in the Intensive Care unit. J Intensive Care Med 10: 34–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maynard N, Bihari D, Beale R et al. (1993) Assessment of splanchnic oxygenation by gastric tonometry in patients with acute circulatory failure. JAMA 270:1203–1210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Oh TE (1996) Gastric tonometry to monitor tissue oxygenation: more than a gut feeling? Br J Anaesth 76: 604–605

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Russell JA (1997) Gastric tonometry: does it work? Intensive Care Med 23: 3–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gomersall CD, Joynt GM, Ho KM et al. (1997) Gastric tonometry and prediction of outcome in the critically ill. Anaesthesia 52: 619–623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Croughwell ND, Newman MF, Lowry E et al. (1997) Effect of temperature during cardiopulmonary bypass on gastric mucosal perfusion. Br J Anaesth 78: 34–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fink MP (1996) Does tissue acidosis in sepsis indicate tissue hypoperfusion? Intensive Care Med 22:1144–1146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1: 307–310

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Maas A, Veefkind A, Van den Camp R, Tennissen A, Winckers E, Jansen P (1977) Evaluation of ampouled tonometered buffered solutions as a quality control system for pH, PCO2 and PO2 measurement. Clin Chem 23: 1718–1725

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Knichwitz G, Kuhmann M, Brodner G et al. (1996) Gastric tonometry: Precision and reliability are improved by a phosphate buffered solution. Crit Care Med 24: 512–516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Riddington D, Venkatesh KB, Clutton-Brock T, Bion J (1994) Measuring carbon dioxide tension in saline and alternative solutions: Quantification of bias and precision in two blood gas analysers. Crit Care Med 22: 96–100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Morgan J, Venkatesh B, Clague A (1997) Blood is a more appropriate equilibration fluid for use in gastric tonometry than saline or Haemaccel. Intensive Care Med 22: (Suppl 1) S69

  14. Kolkman JJ, Zwarekant LJ, Boshuizen K et al. (1997) Types of solution and PCO2 measurement errors during tonometry. Intensive Care Med 23: 658–663

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hatherill M, Tibby SM, Evans R, Durward A, Marsh MJ, Murdoch IA (1997) Gastric tonometry in paediatric septic shock. Intensive Care Med 23: (Suppl 1) S126

  16. Heinonen PO, Jousela IT, Blomqvist KA et al. (1997) Validation of air fonometrie measurement of gastric regional concentrations of CO2 in critically ill septic patients. Intensive Care Med 23: 524–529

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Temmesfeld-Wollbrück B, Szalay A, Olschewski H et al. (1997) Advantage of buffered solutions or automated capnometry in air-filled balloons for use in gastric tonometry. Intensive Care Med 23:423–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Noone RB, Yen MHH, Leone BJ, Mythen MG (1996) In vivo comparison of gastrointestinal tonometry using the saline technique and a novel automated on-line air device (The Tonocap). Intensive Care Med 22: (Suppl 1) S66

  19. Creteur J, De Backer D, Vincent JL (1997) Monitoring gastric mucosal carbon dioxide pressure using gas tonometry. In vitro and in vivo validation studies. Anaesthesiology 87: 504–510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Academic Unit of Anaesthesia, The General Infirmary at Leeds, LSI 3EX, Leeds, UK

    B. Barry, A. Mallick, G. Hartiey, A. Bodenham & M. Vucevic

Authors
  1. B. Barry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Mallick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Hartiey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Bodenham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Vucevic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barry, B., Mallick, A., Hartiey, G. et al. Comparison of air tonometry with gastric tonometry using saline and other equilibrating fluids: an in vivo and in vitro study. Intensive Care Med 24, 777–784 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050665

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050665

Key words

Search

Navigation