Abstract
Objective: To assess the reliability of the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (Ppao) when respiratory excursions in intrathoracic pressure are prominent.
Design: We studied 24 critically ill patients who had 15 mmHg or more of respiratory excursion in their Ppao tracing. Large respiratory excursions resulted from respiratory muscle activity that persisted despite sedation and mechanical ventilation in the assist-control mode. From the Ppao tracing, the end-expiratory and mid-point values were recorded; the latter was measured halfway between end-expiration and the nadir due to inspiratory triggering. The Ppao was then re-measured after administration of a non-depolarizing muscle relaxant.
Setting: Medical intensive care unit of a university-affiliated teaching hospital.
Measurements and results: The difference between the pre-relaxation end-expiratory Ppao and the relaxed Ppao was larger than the difference between the pre-relaxation mid-point Ppao and the relaxed Ppao (11 ± 5 vs 3 ± 3 mmHg, p<0.01). In 21 of 24 (88 %) cases, the relaxed Ppao was more closely approximated by the mid-point Ppao than by the end-expiratory Ppao. The difference between the end-expiratory Ppao and the relaxed Ppao increased as the amount of respiratory excursion increased (r=0,51; p<0.01).
Conclusions: In mechanically ventilated patients whose respiratory muscles produce large excursions in the Ppao, the end-expiratory Ppao is often much higher than the Ppao measured after muscle relaxation. The pre-relaxation mid-point Ppao and the relaxed Ppao are usually similar, but this may not be true in individual patients. In this setting, the Ppao measured after muscle relaxation probably provides the most clinically reliable estimate of left heart filling pressure.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
O’Quin R, Marini JJ (1983) Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure: clinical physiology, measurement and interpretation. Am Rev Respir Dis 128: 319–326
Leatherman JW, Marini J (1993) Pressure monitoring. In: Sprung C (ed) The pulmonary artery catheter: methodology and clinical applications, 2nd edn. Closter, NJ: Critical Care Research Associates, pp. 119–156
Raper R, Sibbald WJ (1986) Misled by the wedge? Swan-Ganz catheter and left ventricular preload. Chest 89: 427–434
Morris AH, Chapman RH, Gardner RM (1984) Frequency of technical problems encountered in the measurement of pulmonary artery wedge pressure. Crit Care Med 12:164–170
Berryhill RE, Benumof JL, Rauscher A et al. (1978) Pulmonary vascular pressure reading at the end of exhalation. Anesthesiology 49: 365–368
Maran AG (1980) Variables in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure: variation with intrathoracic pressure, graphic and digital recorders. Crit Care Med 8:102–105
Schuster DP, Seeman MD (1983) Temporary muscle paralysis for accurate measurement of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure: Chest 84: 593–597
Rice DL, Awe RJ, Gaasch WH et al. (1974) Wedge pressure measurement in obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest 66: 628–632
Marini JJ, Rodriguez R, Lamb VJ (1986) The inspiratory workload of patient-initiated mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 134: 902–909
Marini JJ, Capps J, Culver BH (1985) The inspiratory work of breathing during assisted mechanical ventilation. Chest 87: 612–618
Marini JJ, Smith TC, Lamb VJ (1988) External work output and force generation during synchronized intermittent mechanical ventilation: effect of machine assistance on breathing effort. Am Rev Respir Dis 138:1169–1179
Guiliani R, Mascia L, Recchia F, Caracciolo A, Fiore T, Ranieri VM (1995) Patient-ventilator interaction during synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation: effects of flow triggering. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 151:1–9
Chandra A, Coggeshall JW, Ravenscraft SA et al. (1994) Hyperpnea limits the volume recruited by positive end-expiratory pressure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 150: 911–917
Lessard MR, Lofaso F, Brochard L (1995) Expiratory muscle activity increases intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure independently of dynamic hyperinflation in mechanically ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 151: 562–569
Gorini M, Misuri G, Duranti et al. (1997) Abdominal muscle recruitment and PEEPi during bronchconstriction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 52: 355–361
Takata M, Robotham JL (1992) Effects of inspiratory diaphragmatic descent on inferior vena caval venous return. J Appl Physiol 72: 597–607
Takata M, Wise RA, Robotham JL (1990) Effects of abdominal pressure on venous return: abdominal vascular zone conditions. J Appl Physiol 69: 1961–1972
Bar-Yishay E, Hyatt RE, Rodarte JE (1986) Effect of heart weight on distribution of lung surface pressures in vertical dogs. J Appl Physiol 61: 712–718
Baydur A, Behrakis PK, Zin WA et al. (1982) A simple method for assessing the validity of the esphageal balloon technique. Am Rev Resp Dis 126: 788–791
Marini JJ, O’Quin R, Culver BH et al. (1982) Estimation of transmural cardiac pressures during ventilation with PEEP. J Appl Physiol 53: 384–391
Mead J, Gaensler EA (1959) Esophageal and pleural pressures in man, upright and supine. J Appl Physiol 14: 81–83
Milic-Emili J, Mead J, Turner JM (1964) Topography of esophageal pressure as a function of posture in man. J Appl Physiol 19: 212–216
Dhainaut JF, Devaux JY, Monsallier JF et al. (1986) Mechanisms of decreased left ventricular preload during continuous positive pressure ventilation in ARDS. Chest 90: 74–80
Hansen-Flaschen J, Cowen J, Raps EC (1993) Neuromuscular blockade in the intensive care unit: more than we bargained for. Am Rev Resp Dis 147: 234–236
Pepe PE, Marini JJ (1982) Occult positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with airflow obstruction. Am Rev Resp Dis 126: 166–170
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoyt, J.D., Leatherman, J.W. Interpretation of the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with large respiratory excursions in intrathoracic pressure. Intensive Care Med 23, 1125–1131 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050468
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050468