Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety and efficacy of urapidil and sodium nitroprusside in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies

  • BRIEF REPORT
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of urapidil compared to sodium nitroprusside in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies. Design: randomized, prospective clinical study. Setting: Emergency department in a 2000-bed inner city hospital. Patients: Eighty-one patients with hypertensive emergencies defined as elevation of systolic blood pressure above 200 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure above 110 mmHg plus evidence of end-organ damage were included in the study protocol. The efficacy of therapy was defined as 1) blood pressure reduction below 180/95 mmHg within 90 min and 2) no re-elevation of blood pressure during a 4-h follow-up period in primary responders. The safety of both drugs was defined as the number of minor and major side effects during treatment. Interventions: Patients received either sodium nitroprusside (n = 35; continuous intravenous administration with a starting dose of 0.5 μg/kg per min; increase in increments of 0.5 μg/kg per min every 15 min until response to treatment or a maximum of 3 μg/kg per min) or urapidil (n = 46; intravenous bolus; starting dose: 12.5 mg; repetitive administration of 12.5 mg every 15 min until response or a maximum dose of 75 mg). Measurements and results: Blood pressure was measured every 2.5 min by using a non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure measurement unit. Response to treatment within 90 min was observed in 75 (93 %) patients (urapidil: n = 41 [89 %]; nitroprusside: n = 34 [97 %]; p = 0.18). During the follow-up period 8/34 (24 %) patients in the nitroprusside group and 1/41 (2 %) patients in the urapidil group exhibited blood pressure re-elevation. Major side effects were observed in seven patients receiving nitroprusside and two patients in the urapidil group (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Urapidil is equally effective, compared to sodium nitroprusside, in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies. Due to a smaller number of adverse events, urapidil is a reasonable alternative to nitroprusside in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 21 November 1996 Accepted: 14 May 1997

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hirschl, M., Binder, M., Bur, A. et al. Safety and efficacy of urapidil and sodium nitroprusside in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies. Intensive Care Med 23, 885–888 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050426

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050426

Navigation