Skip to main content
Log in

Definition for septic syndrome should be re-evaluated

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Brun-Buisson C (2000) The epidemiology of the systemic inflammatory response. Intensive Care Med 26 (Suppl 1):S64–S74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abraham E, Mattkay MA, et al. (2000) Consensus conference definition for septic syndrome, acute lung injury and ARDS: time for reevaluation. Crit Care Med, 28:232–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brunkhorst FM, Wegscheider K, Forycki ZF, Brunkhorst R ( 2000) Procalcitonin for early diagnosis and differentiation of SIRS, sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med 26 (Suppl 2):S148–S152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zahorec R, Misianik J, Setvak D (2000) Early changes of neutrophil and lymphocyte counts and serum procalcitonin following surgery, SIRS and sepsis. Intensive Care Med 26 (Suppl 3):S227, 43

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jilma B, Blann A, Pernostorfer T, Stohlawetz P, et al. (1999) Regulation of adhesion molecules during human endotoxemia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159: 857–863

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Zahorec.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zahorec, R. Definition for septic syndrome should be re-evaluated. Intensive Care Med 26, 1870 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340000738

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340000738

Keywords

Navigation