Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is your smartphone the future of physiologic monitoring?

  • What's New in Intensive Care
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Eapen ZJ, Peterson ED (2015) Can mobile health applications facilitate meaningful behavior changes? Time for answers. JAMA 314:1236–1237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pahlevan NM, Rinderknecht DG, Tavallali P et al (2017) Noninvasive iPhone measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction using intrinsic frequency methodology. Crit Care Med 45:1115–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Michard F, Range G, Biais M (2017) Smartphones to assess cardiac function: novelty blindness or fresh perspectives? Crit Care Med 45:e1199–e1201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gratz I, Spitz F, Baruch M et al (2017) Continuous non-invasive finger cuff CareTaker comparable to invasive intra-arterial pressure in patients undergoing major intra-abdominal surgery. BMC Anesthesiol 17:48

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Michard F, Bellomo R, Taenzer A (2018) The rise of ward monitoring. Opportunities and challenges for critical care specialists. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5384-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrachina B, Cobos R, Mardones N et al (2016) Assessment of a smartphone app (Capstesia) for measuring pulse pressure variation: agreement between two methods. Eur J Anaesthesiol 33:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Desebbe O, Joosten A, Suehiro K et al (2016) A novel mobile phone application for pulse pressure variation monitoring based on feature extraction technology: a method comparison study in a simulated environment. Anesth Analg 123:105–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan PH, Wong CK, Poh YC et al (2016) Diagnostic performance of a smartphone-based photoplethysmographic application for atrial fibrillation screening in a primary care setting. J Am Heart Assoc 5:e003428

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Halcox JPJ, Wareham K, Cardew A et al (2017) Assessment of remote heart rhythm sampling using the AliveCor heart monitor to screen for atrial fibrillation: the REHEARSE-AF study. Circulation 136:1784–1794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Garabelli P et al (2016) Comparison of QT interval readings in normal sinus rhythm between a smartphone heart monitor and a 12-lead ECG for healthy volunteers and inpatients receiving sotalol or dofetilide. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 27:827–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Muhlestein JB, Le V, Albert D et al (2015) Smartphone ECG for evaluation of STEMI: results of the ST LEUIS pilot study. J Electrocardiol 48:249–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chandrasekhar A, Natarajan K, Yavarimanesh M, Mukkamala R (2018) An iPhone application for blood pressure monitoring via the oscillometric finger pressing method. Sci Rep 8:13136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Solà J, Proença M, Schoettker P et al (2018) Blood pressure monitoring using a smartphone camera: performance of the OBPM technology. In: March 2018, conference: 2018 IEEE international conference on biomedical and health informatics, Las Vegas

  14. Liebo MJ, Israel RL, Lillie EO et al (2011) Is pocket mobile echocardiography the next-generation stethoscope? A cross-sectional comparison of rapidly acquired images with standard transthoracic echocardiography. Ann Intern Med 155:33–38

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Maurizi N, Faragli A, Imberti J et al (2017) Cardiovascular screening in low income settings using a novel 4-lead smartphone-based electrocardiograph (D-heart). Int J Cardiol 236:249–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MiCo, Chemin de Chapallaz 4, Denens, Switzerland

    Frederic Michard

  2. Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, Araba University Hospital, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain

    Borja Barrachina

  3. Anesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Patrick Schoettker

Authors
  1. Frederic Michard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Borja Barrachina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patrick Schoettker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederic Michard.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

FM is the founder and managing director of MiCo, a Swiss consulting firm. MiCo does not sell any medical products, and FM does not own shares or receive royalties from any medtech company. BB is the co-founder of Galenic App. PS is the chief medical officer of Biospectal SA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michard, F., Barrachina, B. & Schoettker, P. Is your smartphone the future of physiologic monitoring?. Intensive Care Med 45, 869–871 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5419-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5419-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation