Skip to main content
Log in

Catheter retention as a consequence rather than a cause of unfavorable outcome in candidemia

  • Letter
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 20 February 2018

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Change history

  • 20 February 2018

    In the original publication the members of the FUNGINOS network were provided in such a way that they could not be indexed as collaborators on PubMed.

References

  1. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, Clancy CJ, Marr KA, Ostrosky-Zeichner L et al (2016) Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 62:e1–e50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nucci M, Anaissie E, Betts RF, Dupont BF, Wu C, Buell DN et al (2010) Early removal of central venous catheter in patients with candidemia does not improve outcome: analysis of 842 patients from 2 randomized clinical trials. Clin Infect Dis 51:295–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Horn DL, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Morris MI, Ullmann AJ, Wu C, Buell DN et al (2010) Factors related to survival and treatment success in invasive candidiasis or candidemia: a pooled analysis of two large, prospective, micafungin trials. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29:223–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Janum S, Afshari A (2016) Central venous catheter (CVC) removal for patients of all ages with candidaemia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD011195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heinze G, Schemper M (2002) A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat Med 21:2409–2419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

OM designed, implemented, and coordinated the candidemia cohort study.

JG, SZ, AI, KB, UF, CO, AC, TB, and OM collected clinical data, together with the clinical investigators from the centers of the FUNGINOS network listed in Appendix 1.

JS, KM, RZ, TB, RF, and JB collected Candida blood isolates and performed species identification and antifungal susceptibility testing, together with the clinical microbiologists from the centers of the FUNGINOS network listed in Appendix 1.

JB and FL coordinated the FUNGINOS reference mycology laboratory.

OM coordinated the Data Review Committee composed of KB, TB, UF, JG, AI, and SZ.

LD, VE, and PYB organized the dataset and performed statistical analyses.

LD, VE, OM, and PYB wrote the manuscript with the help of SZ, NK, FL, and JF.

All authors critically revised the manuscript and accepted the final version submitted for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Oscar Marchetti or Pierre-Yves Bochud.

Ethics declarations

The national study has been approved by the Ethical Committee of the Lausanne University Hospital as the coordinating center.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

L. Damonti and V. Erard contributed equally as first authors. P.-Y. Bochud and O. Marchetti contributed equally as senior authors.

Clinical and Microbiology Laboratory Investigators of the FUNGINOS network are listed in the Appendix 1 in Electronic Supplementary Material.

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5081-4.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 117 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Damonti, L., Erard, V., Garbino, J. et al. Catheter retention as a consequence rather than a cause of unfavorable outcome in candidemia. Intensive Care Med 43, 935–939 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4737-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4737-9

Navigation