References
Marik PE (2013) Parenteral vs. enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a re-analysis of a flawed meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. doi:10.1007/s00134-013-2865-4
Simpson F, Doig GS (2005) Parenteral vs. enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a meta-analysis of trials using the intention to treat principle. Intensive Care Med 31:12–23
Doig GS, Simpson F, Finfer S et al (2008) Effect of evidence-based feeding guidelines on mortality of critically ill adults: a cluster randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc 300:2731–2741
Rapp RP, Young B, Twyman D et al (1983) The favorable effect of early parenteral feeding on survival in head-injured patients. J Neurosurg 58:906–912
McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW et al (2009) Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 33:277–316
Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT et al (2012) Initial trophic vs. full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury: the EDEN randomized trial. JAMA 307:795–803
Lachin JM (2000) Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. Control Clin Trials 21:167–189
Doig GS, Simpson F, Delaney A (2005) A review of the true methodological quality of nutritional support trials conducted in the critically ill: time for improvement. Anesth Analg 100:527–533
Wood AM, White IR, Thompson SG (2004) Are missing outcome data adequately handled? A review of published randomized controlled trials in major medical journals. Clin Trials 1:368–376
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This reply refers to the comment available at: doi:10.1007/s00134-013-2865-4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doig, G.S. Parenteral versus enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: additional sensitivity analysis supports benefit of early parenteral compared to delayed enteral nutrition. Intensive Care Med 39, 981–982 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-2856-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-2856-5