Introduction

Invasive candidiasis (IC) has become a leading cause of sepsis in critically ill patients [1, 2]. Screening for fungal colonization has been proposed as a method for early identification of patients with the highest risk of developing IC [35]. Thus, although common in this setting, multifocal colonization is often managed by implementing antifungal therapy whose expected benefits are the prevention of such infections as well as the improvement of their outcome [610]. Additional markers are therefore needed. Some clinical scores have been proposed for this purpose [11, 12]. Among them, the Candida Score (CS) could be more reliable than colonization alone.

Procalcitonin (PCT) elevation is strongly associated with systemic bacterial infections [13]. It is unknown to what extent measuring PCT levels could contribute to the early diagnosis of IC [14].

We therefore address this issue in critically ill patients included in a large prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study designed to validate the CS [15].

Materials and methods

Every patient over the age of 18 years old who was admitted for at least 7 days to 36 medical–surgical ICUs were eligible. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the participating centers.

The exclusion criteria used were as follows: (1) age under 18 years; (2) neutropenia, defined as a neutrophil count ≤500/mm3 for more than 3 weeks; (3) life expectancy of less than a week; (4) pregnant women and nursing mothers; (5) fungal infections other than those caused by Candida spp; (6) patients that had Candida spp isolation from a sterile site or were treated with antifungal drugs during the first 7 days of ICU; (7) refusal to give informed consent.

In all patients, surveillance samples for the detection of fungal growth were cultured. The diagnosis of bacterial infection was then considered at the discretion of the attending physician and recorded accordingly.

Definitions have been published elsewhere [15]. Briefly, patients were considered as colonized (i.e., multifocal colonization [MF]) if cultures from at least two non-contiguous body sites grew with Candida species. Invasive candidiasis was considered in colonized patients: (1) if at least one blood culture was positive for Candida species in a patient with consistent clinical symptoms; (2) if the role of Candida was established in patients with peritonitis; (3) if chorioretinitis was diagnosed through fundoscopy in the presence of consistent clinical symptoms. Otherwise, the included patients were considered as being neither colonized nor infected (NCNI).

The rounded CSs for a cutoff value of 3 were as follows: TPN × 1; plus surgery × 1; plus MF × 1, and plus severe sepsis × 2 [11]. For each patient the CS value kept for analysis was its maximum value at or before an IC episode if appropriate.

Values are expressed as mean ± SD unless otherwise stated. Continuous variables were compared with the Mann–Whitney U test or the Kruskall–Wallis test, depending on the number of categories. Categorical variables were compared using the χ 2 test.

A p value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant for all analyses. STATA software was used for all analyses (STATA Statistical Package, College Station, TX).

Results

A total of 1,107 patients were included in the CAVA study. Serum samples were obtained from 240 of them, and 136 of these patients without bacterial infection throughout their ICU stay were selected for PCT analysis: 73 were neither colonized nor infected (NCNI), 43 were colonized (MF), and 20 were colonized and developed invasive candidiasis (MF + IC) (Table 1). Patients from the IC group were more likely to be surgical than those from the MF and the NCNI group.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics and outcomes of the patients according to colonization and/or infection with Candida species

At the time of inclusion, patients from the IC group were more likely to present with septic shock than their non-infected counterparts. In addition, SOFA scores were higher in the IC group.

The highest CSs were found in patients with multifocal fungal colonization (Table 2). Similarly, colonized patients who developed IC had higher CS than those who did not.

Table 2 Candida Score and weekly measurements of procalcitonin in 136 critically ill patients according to colonization and/or infection with Candida species

PCT levels at the time of inclusion were significantly higher in colonized patients who went on to develop IC than in those who did not (Fig. 1). In addition, PCT was higher in the latter patients than in those with neither infection nor colonization. Moreover, PCT levels were found to be within the “normal” range of values in most of the cases. Indeed, PCT obtained at the onset of infection remained lower than 1.5 ng/ml in 17 out of the 20 patients with IC.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Serum procalcitonin weekly measurements in 136 critically ill patients according to colonization and/or infection with Candida species. PCT procalcitonin, NCNI neither colonized nor infected, MF multifocal colonization, IC invasive candidiasis. * and **, p < 0.05

Then, we searched for potent confounding variables that could account for the abovementioned differences in PCT elevation on day 7. Surgery on admission, a high SOFA score, the presence of septic shock and a high CS were also found to be associated with the risk of IC by univariate analysis (Tables 1, 2). All of these relevant variables were therefore entered into a multivariate analysis model. As a result, only CS remained independently associated with the occurrence of IC (Table 3).

Table 3 Multivariate analysis of the predictive factors for invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients with multifocal Candida spp colonization who had been hospitalized for at least 7 days

We aimed thereafter to assess the predictive value of both PCT-D7 and CS regarding the risk of IC by constructing the corresponding ROC curves (Fig. 2 in ESM). These two variables were found to be comparable (Table 4). The optimal cutoff values of PCT-D7 were also extracted from the curves. The use of a PCT-D7 ≥0.3 ng/ml and a CS ≥3 points yielded 80.0% sensitivity and 74.4% specificity. As a result, the positive predictive value of the CS was significantly improved from 44.7 to 59.3% while the negative predictive value remained high (88.9%).

Table 4 Diagnostic accuracy of serum procalcitonin and Candida Score for the discrimination between Candida spp multifocal colonization and infection in critically ill patients who have been hospitalized for at least 7 days

Discussion

We show herein that the weekly calculation of the CS in combination with serum PCT levels in critically ill patients might be helpful in differentiating between those who go on to develop IC and those who do not.

The present multicenter study has shown that a CS of less than 3 points could accurately and safely identify patients who will not benefit from early antifungal therapy [15].

In selected patients included in the present study (i.e., multifocal Candida spp colonization without concurrent bacterial infection), we demonstrate that PCT on day 7 following ICU admission was significantly higher in patients who go on to develop IC than in those who do not. As a result, PCT could improve the diagnosis value of the CS with a cutoff of 0.3 ng/ml by allowing a slight increase of its positive predictive value.

The behavior of serum PCT is unclear in the setting of IC. We have previously reported that PCT elevation was lower in critically ill patients with candidemia compared with those with bacteremia, regardless of the disease severity, suggesting that the host inflammatory response assessed by PCT measurement could be different according to the causative microorganism [16, 17]. The present results are in accordance with such findings since PCT elevation at the onset of IC remains within a low range of values in most of the cases, although septic shock was a frequent condition in these patients.

In addition, our findings suggest that fungal colonization per se could trigger an inflammatory response, the magnitude of which would be related to the risk of developing IC. The degree of fungal invasion could be assessed therefore through PCT measurements in colonized patients.

Accordingly, the interest of combining a clinical score with a biomarker has already been suggested in the setting of ventilator-associated pneumonia, another common but difficult to diagnose nosocomial infection [18].

Several limitations have to be mentioned. First of all, the small size of our sample might have hidden some differences between groups because of a lack of statistical power. Accordingly, we could not exclude the possibility that the greater severity of the disease in patients from the IC group accounted for the higher PCT levels. PCT should therefore be used as a surrogate for the assessment of disease severity. Second, our results were obtained in selected patients, namely those without bacterial sepsis, in order to avoid other causes of a PCT increase. Hence, our subset of patients is peculiar and somewhat different from the whole cohort population [15]. Accordingly, the pre-test probability of IC is higher, and the diagnosis value of the combination of CS and PCT might have been overestimated. Our findings should therefore be very cautiously translated into clinical practice given the high prevalence of bacterial sepsis in the ICU setting. Third, we cannot exclude the possibility that patients with actual bacterial sepsis, although not proven, were improperly selected. It has been shown that no microbial agent was isolated in around 70% of the patients with septic shock [19]. As a result, PCT values obtained on day 7 in patients who developed IC could have been overestimated.

Measurement of serum PCT in addition to calculation of the CS in critically ill patients exhibiting multifocal Candida spp colonization without bacterial infection might be useful for the risk assessment of further IC. Early antifungal therapy might be considered in patients with a CS ≥3 points combined with a PCT ≥0.3 ng/ml. Further studies are needed to assess prospectively the relevance of such findings.