Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of acceptability, skin tolerance, and compliance between handwashing and alcohol-based handrub in ICUs: results of a multicentric study

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

We compared handwashing (HW) and alcohol-based handrub (ABH) for skin tolerance, acceptability, and hand hygiene compliance in health-care workers (HCWs) in a multicentric study.

Design and setting

Before/after study over two periods (P1 and P2) in seven ICUs. Monitoring of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) acquisition in two ICUs (U4 and U6).

Subjects and patients

All HCWs of the seven ICUs, and the patients of U4 and U6 without MRSA carriage on admission.

Interventions

Handwashing was available in P1 and P2. ABH was introduced after P1 and available throughout P2. HCWs completed questionnaires on skin tolerance in P1 and P2, and on acceptability in P2. Compliance with hand hygiene was assessed in P1 and P2 using a standardized method. ICU-acquired MRSA colonization/infection in U4 and U6 was recorded.

Measurements and main results

Hand erythema was reported during P1 and P2 by 21.7 and 11% of HCWs, respectively (P = 0.01), itching by 15.8 and 7.1% (P = 0.02), oozing by 0.8 and 1.1% (P = 0.82), and bleeding by 4.2 and 1.1% (P = 0.1). ABH was considered easier and quicker than HW (P < 0.01), but overall acceptability did not differ between the two. Compliance increased from 51% (334/647) in P1 to 60% (251/418) in P2, P < 0.01. No significant reduction in MRSA colonization/infection between P1 and P2 (P = 0.30) was observed, but the study was underpowered.

Conclusions

Self-report questionnaires show that when ABH is available in ICUs, fewer unpleasant skin sensations are reported. ABH is considered to be easier and quicker to use than HW and compliance is improved after glove removal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization (2006) WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in healthcare. World Health Organization, Geneva. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/information_centre/Last_April_versionHH_Guidelines%5B3%5D.pdf. Accessed October 30 2008

  2. Pittet D (2001) Improving adherence to hand hygiene practice: a multidisciplinary approach. Emerg Infect Dis 7:234–240

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyce JM, Pittet D (2002) Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Association for Professionals in Infection Control/Infectious Diseases Society of America. MMWR Recomm Rep 51:1–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pittet D, Mourouga P, Perneger TV (1999) Compliance with handwashing in a teaching hospital. Infection control program. Ann Intern Med 130:126–130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Larson EL, Aiello AE, Bastyr J, Lyle C, Stahl J, Cronquist A, Lai L, Della-Latta P (2001) Assessment of two hand hygiene regimens for intensive-care unit personnel. Crit Care Med 29:944–951

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Larson EL, Cimiotti J, Haas J, Parides M, Nesin M, Della-Latta P, Saiman L (2005) Effect of antiseptic handwashing versus alcohol sanitizer on health care-associated infections in neonatal intensive-care units. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 159:377–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boyce JM, Kelliher S, Vallande N (2000) Skin irritation and dryness associated with two hand-hygiene regimens: soap-and-water hand washing versus hand antisepsis with an alcoholic hand gel. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 21:442–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Winnefeld M, Richard MA, Drancourt M, Grob JJ (2000) Skin tolerance and effectiveness of two hand decontamination procedures in everyday hospital use. Br J Dermatol 143:546–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kramer A, Bernig T, Kampf G (2002) Clinical double-blind trial on the dermal tolerance and user acceptability of six alcohol-based hand disinfectants for hygienic hand disinfection. J Hosp Infect 51:114–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Voss A, Widmer AF (1997) No time for handwashing! Handwashing versus alcoholic rub: can we afford 100% compliance? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 18:205–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pittet D, Hugonnet S, Harbarth S, Mourouga P, Sauvan V, Touveneau S, Perneger TV (2000) Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Infection control programme. Lancet 356:1307–1312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maury E, Alzieu M, Baudel JL, Haram N, Barbut F, Guidet B, Offenstadt G (2000) Availability of an alcohol solution can improve hand disinfection compliance in an intensive-care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:324–327

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bischoff WE, Reynolds TM, Sessler CN, Edmond MB, Wenzel RP (2000) Handwashing compliance by health-care workers: the impact of introducing an accessible, alcohol-based hand antiseptic. Arch Intern Med 160:1017–1021

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harbarth S, Pittet D, Grady L, Zawacki A, Potter-Bynoe G, Samore MH, Goldmann DA (2002) Interventional study to evaluate the impact of an alcohol-based hand gel in improving hand hygiene compliance. Pediatr Infect Dis J 21:489–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Traore O, Hugonnet S, Lubbe J, Griffiths W, Pittet D (2007) Liquid versus gel handrub formulation: a prospective intervention study. Crit Care 11:R52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Souweine B, Traore O, Aublet-Cuvelier B, Bret L, Sirot J, Laveran H, Deteix P (2000) Role of infection control measures in limiting morbidity associated with multi-resistant organisms in critically ill patients. J Hosp Infect 45:107–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sznajder M, Leleu G, Buonamico G, Auvert B, Aegerter P, Merlière Y, Dutheil M, Guidet B, Le Gall JR (1998) Estimation of direct cost and resource allocation in intensive care: correlation with Omega system. Intensive Care Med 24:582–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Members of the Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie (2003) Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie report. Int J Antimicrob Agents 21:364-391

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pittet D, Stephan F, Hugonnet S, Akakpo C, Souweine B, Clergue F (2003) Hand-cleansing during postanesthesia care. Anesthesiology 99:530–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sax H, Allegranzi B, Uckay I, Larson E, Boyce J, Pittet D (2007) My five moments for hand hygiene: a user-centred design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene. J Hosp Infect 67:9–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Larson E, Leyden JJ, McGinley KJ, Grove GL, Talbot GH (1986) Physiologic and microbiologic changes in skin related to frequent handwashing. Infect Control 7:59–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Larson E, McGinley KJ, Grove GL, Leyden JJ, Talbot GH (1986) Physiologic, microbiologic, and seasonal effects of handwashing on the skin of health care personnel. Am J Infect Control 14:51–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Barbut F, Maury E, Goldwirt L, Boëlle PY, Neyme D, Aman R, Rossi B, Offenstadt G (2007) Comparison of the antibacterial efficacy and acceptability of an alcohol-based hand rinse with two alcohol-based hand gels during routine patient care. J Hosp Infect 66:167–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Creedon SA (2005) Healthcare workers’ hand decontamination practices: compliance with recommended guidelines. J Adv Nurs 51:208–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Eldridge NE, Woods SS, Bonello RS, Clutter K, Ellingson L, Harris MA, Livingston BK, Bagian JP, Danko LH, Dunn EJ, Parlier RL, Pederson C, Reichling KJ, Roselle GA, Wright SM (2006) Using the six sigma process to implement the Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for hand hygiene in 4 intensive-care units. J Gen Intern Med 21:S35–S42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Basketter DA, Griffiths HA, Wang XM, Wilhelm KP, McFadden J (1996) Individual, ethnic and seasonal variability in irritant susceptibility of skin: the implications for a predictive human patch test. Contact Dermat 35:208–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Larson E, Girard R, Pessoa-Silva CL, Boyce J, Donaldson L, Pittet D (2006) Skin reactions related to hand hygiene and selection of hand hygiene products. Am J Infect Control 34:627–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pittet D, Allegranzi B, Sax H, Dharan S, Pessoa-Silva CL, Donaldson L, Boyce JM, WHO Global Patient Safety Challenge, World Alliance for Patient Safety (2006) Evidence-based model for hand transmission during patient care and the role of improved practices. Lancet Infect Dis 6:641–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Maury E, Moussa N, Lakermi C, Barbut F, Offenstadt G (2006) Compliance of health-care workers to hand hygiene: awareness of being observed is important. Intensive Care Med 32:2088–2089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pittet D, Simon A, Hugonnet S, Pessoa-Silva CL, Sauvan V, Perneger TV (2004) Hand hygiene among physicians: performance, beliefs, and perceptions. Ann Intern Med 141:1–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Brown SM, Lubimova AV, Khrustalyeva NM, Shulaeva SV, Tekhova I, Zueva LP, Goldmann D, O’Rourke EJ (2003) Use of an alcohol-based hand rub and quality improvement interventions to improve hand hygiene in a Russian neonatal intensive-care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 24:172–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Girou E, Loyeau S, Legrand P, Oppein F, Brun-Buisson C (2002) Efficacy of handrubbing with alcohol based solution versus standard handwashing with antiseptic soap: randomised clinical trial. BMJ 325:362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Johnson PD, Martin R, Burrell LJ, Grabsch EA, Kirsa SW, O’Keeffe J, Mayall BC, Edmonds D, Barr W, Bolger C, Naidoo H, Grayson ML (2005) Efficacy of an alcohol/chlorhexidine hand hygiene program in a hospital with high rates of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. Med J Aust 183:509–514

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Grayson ML, Jarvie LJ, Martin R, Johnson PD, Jodoin ME, McMullan C, Gregory RH, Bellis K, Cunnington K, Wilson FL, Quin D, Kelly AM, Hand Hygiene Study Group, Hand Hygiene Statewide Roll-out Group, Victorian Quality Council (2008) Hand Hygiene Study Group and Hand Hygiene Statewide Roll-out Group, Victorian Quality Council. Significant reductions in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and clinical isolates associated with a multisite, hand hygiene culture-change program and subsequent successful statewide roll-out. Med J Aust 188:633–640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rupp ME, Fitzgerald T, Puumala S, Anderson JR, Craig R, Iwen PC, Jourdan D, Keuchel J, Marion N, Peterson D, Sholtz L, Smith V (2008) Prospective, controlled, cross-over trial of alcohol-based hand gel in critical care units. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 29:8–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by research grant PHRC from the Délégation à la Recherche Clinique, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand. We are indebted to Mr Jeffrey Watts for assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ousmane Traoré.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Souweine, B., Lautrette, A., Aumeran, C. et al. Comparison of acceptability, skin tolerance, and compliance between handwashing and alcohol-based handrub in ICUs: results of a multicentric study. Intensive Care Med 35, 1216–1224 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1485-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1485-5

Keywords

Navigation