Abstract
Objectives
To create a tool for benchmarking intensive care units (ICUs) with respect to case-mix adjusted length of stay (LOS) and to study the association between clinical and economic measures of ICU performance.
Design
Observational cohort study.
Setting
Twenty-three ICUs in Finland.
Patients
A total of 80,854 consecutive ICU admissions during 2000–2005, of which 63,304 met the inclusion criteria.
Interventions
None.
Measurements and results
Linear regression was used to create a model that predicted ICU LOS. Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, age, disease categories according to Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III, single highest Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System score collected during the ICU stay and presence of other ICUs in the hospital were included in the model. Probabilities of hospital death were calculated using SAPS II, age, and disease categories as covariates. In the validation sample, the created model accounted for 28% of variation in ICU LOS across individual admissions and 64% across ICUs. The expected ICU LOS was 2.53 ± 2.24 days and the observed ICU LOS was 3.29 ± 5.37 days, P < 0.001. There was no association between the mean observed − mean expected ICU LOS and standardized mortality ratios of the ICUs (Spearman correlation 0.091, P = 0.680).
Conclusions
We developed a tool for the assessment of resource use in a large nationwide ICU database. It seems that there is no association between clinical and economic quality indicators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rapoport J, Teres D, Zhao Y, Lemeshow S (2003) Length of stay data as a guide to hospital economic performance for ICU patients. Med Care 41:386–397
Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, Malila FM, Shaffer VL (2006) Intensive care unit length of stay: benchmarking based on Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV. Crit Care Med 34:2517–2529
Nathanson BH, Higgings TL, Teres D, Copes WS, Kramer A, Stark M (2007) A revised method to assess intensive care unit clinical performance and resource utilization. Crit Care Med 35:1853–1862
Rothen HU, Strucker K, Einalt J, Bauer P, Metnitz PG, Moreno RP, Takala J (2007) Variability in outcome and resource use in intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 33:1329–1336
Render ML, Kim M, Deddens J, Sivaganesin S, Welsh DE, Bickel K, Freyberg R, Timmons S, Johnston J, Connors AF, Wagner D, Hofer T (2005) Variation in outcomes in veterans affairs intensive care units with a computerized severity measure. Crit Care Med 33:930–939
Suistomaa M, Niskanen M, Kari A, Hynynen M, Takala J (2002) Customised prediction models based on APACHE II and SAPS II scores in patient with prolonged length of stay in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 28:479–485
Stricker K, Rothen HU, Takala J (2003) Resource use in the ICU: short- vs. long-term patients. Acta Anaesth Scand 47:508–515
Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE, Bergner M, Bastos PG, Sirio CA, Murphy DJ, Lotring T, Damiano A, Harrel FE (1991) The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 100:1619–1636
Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963
Keene AR, Cullen DJ (1983) Therapeutic intervention scoring system: update 1983. Crit Care Med 11:1–3
Engel C, Brunkhorst F, Bone H-G, Brunkhorst R, Gerlach H, Grond S, Gruendling M, Huhle G, Jaschinski U, John S, Mayer K, Oppert M, Olthoff D, Quintel M, Ragaller M, Rossaint R, Stuber F, Weiler N, Welte T, Bogatsch H, Hartog C, Loeffler M, Reinhart K (2007) Epidemiology of sepsis in Germany: results from a national prospective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med 33:606–618
Walther SM, Jonasson U (2004) Outcome of the elderly critically ill after intensive care in an era of cost containment. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 48:417–422
Metnitz P, Moreno R, Allmeida E, Jordan B, Bauer P, Abizanda R, Iapichino G, Edbrooke D, Capuzzo M, Le Gall J-R (2005) SAPS 3—from evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. part 1: objectives, methods and cohort description. Intensive Care Med 31:1336–1344
Weissman C (1997) Analyzing intensive care unit length of stay data: problems and possible solutions. Crit Care Med 25:1594–1600
Mussalo P, Tenhunen J (2007) Data completeness in the Finnish Intensive Care Quality Consortium database. Crit Care 11(Suppl):S198–S199
Suistomaa M, Kari A, Ruokonen E, Takala J (2000) Sampling rate causes bias in APACHE II and SAPS II scores. Intensive Care Med 26:1773–1778
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Finnish Consortium of Intensive Care and Intensium Ltd, Kuopio, Finland, for the data used in this study. ICUs in the following hospitals contributed to the data collection: Satakunta Central Hospital, East Savo Central Hospital, Central Finland Central Hospital, South Savo Central Hospital, North Carelia Central Hospital, Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Kainuu Central Hospital, Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, Lapland Central Hospital, Keski-Pohjanmaa Central Hospital, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Länsi-Pohja Central Hospital, Vaasa Central Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Jorvi Hospital, Tampere University Hospital, Kuopio University Hospital, Oulu University Hospital, Turku University Hospital.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niskanen, M., Reinikainen, M. & Pettilä, V. Case-mix-adjusted length of stay and mortality in 23 Finnish ICUs. Intensive Care Med 35, 1060–1067 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1377-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1377-0