Abstract
Objective
To assess whether cross-checking of the physician ICU transfer report by ICU nurses may reduce transfer report errors.
Design
Prospective, observational study with random selection (according to patient registration code) of ICU transfer reports.
Setting
Eight-bed multidisciplinary intensive care unit of a teaching hospital.
Patients and participants
ICU transfer reports of 123 patients were randomly selected at discharge from the ICU between November 2006 and February 2007.
Interventions
Physician ICU transfer reports were cross-checked by nurses using defined review criteria. Inter-rater agreement (between nurses and the head of ICU) was assessed by κ-values, and was excellent overall (0.9). All intercepted errors (100%) were consequently corrected by the interns.
Measurements and results
Out of 123 transfer reports, 76 (62%) were affected by at least one error. Among 305 intercepted errors, 247 were prescription errors (26% of all prescriptions), 45 involved proposed procedures, and 13 were deficient in updating diagnoses. Most of the errors (248/305, 81%) were classified as simple, 43 (14%) as serious, or 14 (5%) as critical. Thirty-five (28%) transfer reports were considered potentially harmful (i.e., affected by at least one critical/serious error). In a multivariate model, only the number of medications included in the transfer report was associated with the occurrence of at least one critical/serious error.
Conclusions
Errors in ICU transfer reports are frequent and may be potentially harmful. ICU nurses may help to effectively and accurately intercept those inaccuracies, and therefore reduce the exportation of errors from the ICU to the ward.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rothschild JM, Landrigan CP, Cronin JW, Kaushal R, Lockley SW, Burdick E, Stone PH, Lilly CM, Katz JT, Czeisler CA, Bates DW (2005) The critical care safety study: the incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care. Crit Care Med 33:1694–1700
Kopp BJ, Erstad BL, Allen ME, Theodorou AA, Priestley G (2006) Medication errors and adverse drug events in an intensive care unit: direct observation approach for detection. Crit Care Med 34:415–425
Bracco D, Favre JB, Bissonnette B, Wasserfallen JB, Revelly JP, Ravussin P, Chiolero R (2001) Human errors in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit: a 1-year prospective study. Intensive Care Med 27:137–145
Osmon S, Harris CB, Dunagan WC, Prentice D, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH (2004) Reporting of medical errors: an intensive care unit experience. Crit Care Med 32:727–733
Valentin A. Capuzzo M, Guidet B, Moreno RP, Dolanski L, Bauer P, Metnitz PGH; Research Group on Quality Improvement of European Society for Intensive Care Medicine; Sentinel Events Evaluation Study Investigators (2006) Patient safety in intensive care: results from the multinational Sentinel Events Evaluation (SEE) study. Intensive Care Med 322:1591–1598
Tissot E, Cornette C, Demoly P, Jacquet M, Barale F, Capellier G (1999) Medication errors at the administration stage in an intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 25:353–359
Adhiyaman V, Oke A, White AD, Shah IU (2000) Diagnoses in discharge communications: how far are they reliable? Int J Clin Pract 54:457–458
Macaulay EM, Cooper GG, Engeset J, Naylor AR (1996) Prospective audit of discharge summary errors. Br J Surg 83:788–790
van Walraven C, Weinberg AL (1995) Quality assessment of a discharge summary system. CMAJ 152:1437–1442
Wilson S, Ruscoe W, Chapman M, Miller R (2001) General practitioner-hospital communications: a review of discharge summaries. J Qual Clin Pract 21:104–108
Rao P, Andrei A, Fried A, Gonzalez D, Shine D (2005) Assessing quality and efficiency of discharge summaries. Am J Med Qual 20:337–343
Reason J (2000) Human error: models and management. BMJ 320:768–770
Morimoto T, Gandhi TK, Seger AC, Hsieh TC, Bates DW (2004) Adverse drug events and medication errors: detection and classification methods. Qual Saf Health Care 13:306–314
Cullen DJ, Sweitzer BJ, Bates DW, Burdick E, Edmondson A, Leape LL (1997) Preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a comparative study of intensive care and general care units. Crit Care Med 25:1289–1297
Ridley SA, Booth SA, Thomson CM, Intensive Care Society’s Working Group on Adverse Incidents (2004) Prescription errors in UK critical care units. Anaesthesia 59:1193–1200
Colpaert K, Claus B, Somers A, Vandewoude K, Robays H, Decruyenaere J (2006) Impact of computerized physician order entry on medication prescription errors in the intensive care unit: a controlled cross-sectional trial. Crit Care 10:R21
van den Bemt PM, Fijn R, van der Voort PH, Gossen AA, Egberts TC, Brouwers JR (2002) Frequency and determinants of drug administration errors in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 30:846–850
Institute for Safe Medication Practices (2007) ISMP’s list of high-alert medications. Pennsylvania, USA; obtainable at http://www.ismp.org/Tools/highalertmedications.pdf
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all our nurses for participating in this study and to Renata Marchetti for secretarial assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perren, A., Conte, P., De Bitonti, N. et al. From the ICU to the ward: cross-checking of the physician’s transfer report by intensive care nurses. Intensive Care Med 34, 2054–2061 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1138-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1138-0