Abstract
Objective
To compare intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurements obtained from an intragastric Compliance catheter with the pressure measured directly in the abdominal cavity.
Design and setting
Prospective cohort study in an operating room of the Ghent University Hospital
Patients
Seven patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Interventions
IAP was obtained from both an intragastric catheter and directly from the peritoneal cavity at 1-minute intervals in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy and compared using Bland-Altman analysis.
Measurements and results
In 156 paired measurements obtained from 7 patients the mean difference between IAPgastric and IAPref was 0.12 ± 0.70 mmHg (95% CI 0.01–0.23).
Conclusions
IAP measured using an intragastric Compliance catheter reliably reflects the reference IAP in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Malbrain ML, Chiumello D, Pelosi P, Wilmer A, Brienza N, Malcangi V, Bihari D, Innes R, Cohen J, Singer P, Japiassu A, Kurtop E, De Keulenaer BL, Daelemans R, Del Turco M, Cosimini P, Ranieri M, Jacquet L, Laterre PF, Gattinoni L (2004) Prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: a multicentre epidemiological study. Intensive Care Med 30:822–829
Malbrain ML (2004) Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal. Intensive Care Med 30:357–371
De Waele JJ, Billiet EA, Hoste E, Blot SI, Colardyn FA (2005) Fluid vs. air for semicontinuous intra-abdominal pressure measurements using a compliance catheter. Intensive Care Med 31:598–599
De Potter TJ, Dits H, Malbrain ML (2005) Intra- and interobserver variability during in vitro validation of two novel methods for intra-abdominal pressure monitoring. Intensive Care Med 31:747–751
Schachtrupp A, Tons C, Fackeldey V, Hoer J, Reinges M, Schumpelick V (2003) Evaluation of two novel methods for the direct and continuous measurement of the intra-abdominal pressure in a porcine model. Intensive Care Med 29:1605–1608
Brooks AJ, Simpson A, Delbridge M, Beckingham IJ, Girling KJ (2005) Validation of direct intraabdominal pressure measurement using a continuous indwelling compartment pressure monitor. J Trauma 58:830–832
Fusco MA, Martin RS, Chang MC (2001) Estimation of intra-abdominal pressure by bladder pressure measurement: validity and methodology. J Trauma 50:297–302
Sugrue M, Buist MD, Lee A, Sanchez DJ, Hillman KM (1994) Intra-abdominal pressure measurement using a modified nasogastric tube: description and validation of a new technique. Intensive Care Med 20:588–590
Johna S, Taylor E, Brown C, Zimmerman G (1999) Abdominal compartment syndrome: does intra-cystic pressure reflect actual intra-abdominal pressure? A prospective study in surgical patients. Crit Care (Lond) 3:135–138
Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet I:307–410
Balogh Z, Jones F, D'Amours S, Parr M, Sugrue M (2004) Continuous intra-abdominal pressure measurement technique. Am J Surg 188:679–684
Engum SA, Kogon B, Jensen E, Isch J, Balanoff C, Grosfeld JL (2002) Gastric tonometry and direct intraabdominal pressure monitoring in abdominal compartment syndrome. J Pediatr Surg 37:214–218
Collee GG, Lomax DM, Ferguson C, Hanson GC (1993) Bedside measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) via an indwelling naso-gastric tube: clinical validation of the technique. Intensive Care Med 19:478–480
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
J.J. De Waele is supported by a Clinical Doctoral Grant of the Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders (Belgium; F.W.O.-Vlaanderen).
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Waele, J.J., Berrevoet, F., Reyntjens, K. et al. Semicontinuous intra-abdominal pressure measurement using an intragastric Compliance catheter . Intensive Care Med 33, 1297–1300 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0682-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0682-3