Skip to main content
Log in

Abdominal ultrasound in the intensive care unit: a 3-year survey on 400 patients

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study analyzed 400 ultrasound examinations in the ICU to assess the indications of this imaging modality.

Design and setting

Retrospective analysis on prospectively collected data on 400 patients in a tertiary care hospital.

Patients and participants

The observational, prospective, clinical study examined 400 bedside abdominal ultrasound examinations performed in the ICU, of which 2% were performed emergently, 56% urgently, and 42% electively.

Measurements and results

Environmental conditions impaired the examination slightly in 54%, moderately in 27%, and severely in 4%. Total time per study ranged from 1 to 45 min (median 10). New pathological findings were detected in 31% while 33% confirmed already known pathologies. In 53% there was no therapeutic consequence, in 27% treatment was continued based on the sonographic findings, in 10% an intervention was necessary, in 6% other therapeutic changes followed, and in 4% additional evaluation was deemed necessary. In 80% no other imaging test had to be performed.

Conclusions

Ultrasound studies are deemed sufficient in a large proportion of patients and help to avoid other, more elaborate imaging studies. However, more focused indications for studies may help to improve cost-effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Crone-Munzebrock W, Wegener C, Nicolas V, Pothmann W (1990) The relevance of sonography in the diagnosis of acute abdomen in the intensive care unit. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 153:379–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Seitz K, Vasilakis D, Ziegler M (2003) Efficiency of a portable B-scan ultrasound device in comparison to a high-end machine in abdominal ultrasound. Results of a pilot study. Ultraschall Med 24:96–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jakob SM, Rothen HU (1997) Intensive care 1980–1995: change in patient characteristics, nursing workload and outcome. Intensive Care Med 23:1165–1170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chonobayashi N, Aoshima M, Yokota N, Kisu T, Yambe Y, Taneda K, Tada H, Nagano H (1995) Mechanical ventilation and long-term respiratory care in the intensive care unit of a general hospital. Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi 33:159–167

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cosgrove SE, Qi Y, Kaye KS, Harbarth S, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y (2005) The impact of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia on patient outcomes: mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 26:166–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Troche G, Joly LM, Guibert M, Zazzo JF (2005) Detection and treatment of antibiotic-resistent bacterial carriage in a surgical intensive care unit: a 6-year prospective survey. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 26:161–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lucet JC, Paoletti X, Lolom I, Paugam-Burtz C, Trouillet JL, Timsit JF, eblangy C, Andremont A, Regnier (2005) Successful long-term rogram for controlling methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 31:1051–1057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lock G, Zülke C, Lerch K, Andreesen R, Eilles C, Jauch KW, Feuerbach S, Schölmerich J (2000) Das Ultraschallzentrum als ökonomisch und medizinisch sinnvolle Alternative – ein Erfahrungsbericht über das Regensburger Modell. Z Gastroenterol 38:941–944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer T, Filimonow S, Petersein J, Beyersdorff D, Muhler M, Bollow M, Badakhshi HR, Hamm B (2002) Ultrasound at the bedside: does a portable ultrasound device save time? Ultraschall Med 23:311–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lichtenstein D, Axler O (1993) Intensive use of general ultrasound in the intensive care unit. Prospective study of 150 consecutive patients. Intensive Care Med 19:353–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Go HL, Baarslag HJ, Vermeulen H, Lameris JS, Legemate DA (2005) A comparative study to validate the use of ultrasonography and computed tomography in patients with post-operative intra-abdominal sepsis. Eur J Radiol 54:383–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Slasky BS, Auerbach D, Skolnick ML (1983) Value of portable real-time ultrasound in the ICU. Crit Care Med 11:160–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doris Schacherer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schacherer, D., Klebl, F., Goetz, D. et al. Abdominal ultrasound in the intensive care unit: a 3-year survey on 400 patients. Intensive Care Med 33, 841–844 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0577-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0577-3

Keywords

Navigation