Abstract
Objective
This study analyzed 400 ultrasound examinations in the ICU to assess the indications of this imaging modality.
Design and setting
Retrospective analysis on prospectively collected data on 400 patients in a tertiary care hospital.
Patients and participants
The observational, prospective, clinical study examined 400 bedside abdominal ultrasound examinations performed in the ICU, of which 2% were performed emergently, 56% urgently, and 42% electively.
Measurements and results
Environmental conditions impaired the examination slightly in 54%, moderately in 27%, and severely in 4%. Total time per study ranged from 1 to 45 min (median 10). New pathological findings were detected in 31% while 33% confirmed already known pathologies. In 53% there was no therapeutic consequence, in 27% treatment was continued based on the sonographic findings, in 10% an intervention was necessary, in 6% other therapeutic changes followed, and in 4% additional evaluation was deemed necessary. In 80% no other imaging test had to be performed.
Conclusions
Ultrasound studies are deemed sufficient in a large proportion of patients and help to avoid other, more elaborate imaging studies. However, more focused indications for studies may help to improve cost-effectiveness.
References
Crone-Munzebrock W, Wegener C, Nicolas V, Pothmann W (1990) The relevance of sonography in the diagnosis of acute abdomen in the intensive care unit. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 153:379–384
Seitz K, Vasilakis D, Ziegler M (2003) Efficiency of a portable B-scan ultrasound device in comparison to a high-end machine in abdominal ultrasound. Results of a pilot study. Ultraschall Med 24:96–100
Jakob SM, Rothen HU (1997) Intensive care 1980–1995: change in patient characteristics, nursing workload and outcome. Intensive Care Med 23:1165–1170
Chonobayashi N, Aoshima M, Yokota N, Kisu T, Yambe Y, Taneda K, Tada H, Nagano H (1995) Mechanical ventilation and long-term respiratory care in the intensive care unit of a general hospital. Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi 33:159–167
Cosgrove SE, Qi Y, Kaye KS, Harbarth S, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y (2005) The impact of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia on patient outcomes: mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 26:166–174
Troche G, Joly LM, Guibert M, Zazzo JF (2005) Detection and treatment of antibiotic-resistent bacterial carriage in a surgical intensive care unit: a 6-year prospective survey. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 26:161–165
Lucet JC, Paoletti X, Lolom I, Paugam-Burtz C, Trouillet JL, Timsit JF, eblangy C, Andremont A, Regnier (2005) Successful long-term rogram for controlling methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 31:1051–1057
Lock G, Zülke C, Lerch K, Andreesen R, Eilles C, Jauch KW, Feuerbach S, Schölmerich J (2000) Das Ultraschallzentrum als ökonomisch und medizinisch sinnvolle Alternative – ein Erfahrungsbericht über das Regensburger Modell. Z Gastroenterol 38:941–944
Fischer T, Filimonow S, Petersein J, Beyersdorff D, Muhler M, Bollow M, Badakhshi HR, Hamm B (2002) Ultrasound at the bedside: does a portable ultrasound device save time? Ultraschall Med 23:311–314
Lichtenstein D, Axler O (1993) Intensive use of general ultrasound in the intensive care unit. Prospective study of 150 consecutive patients. Intensive Care Med 19:353–355
Go HL, Baarslag HJ, Vermeulen H, Lameris JS, Legemate DA (2005) A comparative study to validate the use of ultrasonography and computed tomography in patients with post-operative intra-abdominal sepsis. Eur J Radiol 54:383–387
Slasky BS, Auerbach D, Skolnick ML (1983) Value of portable real-time ultrasound in the ICU. Crit Care Med 11:160–164
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schacherer, D., Klebl, F., Goetz, D. et al. Abdominal ultrasound in the intensive care unit: a 3-year survey on 400 patients. Intensive Care Med 33, 841–844 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0577-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0577-3