Skip to main content
Log in

Discrepancies between observed and predicted continuous venovenous hemofiltration removal of antimicrobial agents in critically ill patients and the effects on dosing

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Drug dosing during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) is based partly upon the CVVH clearance (ClCVVH) of the drug. ClCVVH is the product of the sieving coefficient (SC) and ultrafiltration rate (Quf). Although it has been suggested that the SC can be replaced by the fraction of a drug not bound to protein (Fup), the Fup values as reported in the literature may not reflect the protein binding in critically ill patients with renal failure. We compared the observed ClCVVH (SC × Quf) with the estimated ClCVVH (estimated FUP × Quf) and determined the effect on the maintenance dose multiplication factor (MDMF).

Design and setting

Clinical study in a mixed ICU in a university hospital.

Patients

45 oligoanuric patients on CVVH (2 l/h).

Interventions

Timed blood and ultrafiltrate samples.

Measurements and results

Amoxicillin, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, fluconazole, metronidazole, and vancomycin were easily filtered (mean SC > 0.7) but not flucloxacillin (mean SC 0.3). Predicted and observed ClCVVH corresponded only for fluconazole and metronidazole. The difference between observed and predicted MDMF was small for all drugs, with the exception of ceftazidime (mean 0.25, 95% CI −0.96 to 1.48) and vancomycin (0.05, −1.34 to 1.45). However, this difference was clinically relevant only for vancomycin, because of its narrow therapeutic index.

Conclusions

Dosing based on predicted CVVH removal provides an as reliable estimate than that based on observed CVVH removal except for those antibiotics that have both a narrow therapeutic index and a predominantly renal clearance (e.g., vancomycin).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mehrotra R, De Gaudio R, Palazzo M (2004) Antibiotic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in critical illness. Intensive Care Med 30:2145–2156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Subach RA, Marx MA (1998) Drug dosing in acute renal failure: the role of renal replacement therapy in altering drug pharmacokinetics. Adv Ren Replace Ther 5:141–147

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reetze-Bonorden P, Bohler J, Keller E (1993) Drug dosage in patients during continuous renal replacement therapy. Pharmacokinetic and therapeutic considerations. Clin Pharmacokinet 24:362–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lau AH, Kronfol NO (1994) Determinants of drug removal by continuous hemofiltration. Int J Artif Organs 17:373–378

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bohler J, Donauer J, Keller F (1999) Pharmacokinetic principles during continuous renal replacement therapy: drugs and dosage. Kidney Int Suppl 72:S24–S28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Golper TA, Wedel SK, Kaplan AA, Saad AM, Donta ST, Paganini EP (1985) Drug removal during continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration: theory and clinical observations. Int J Artif Organs 8:307–312

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bugge JF (2001) Pharmacokinetics and drug dosing adjustments during continuous venovenous hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration in critically ill patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 45:929–934

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ronco C, Bellomo R, Homel P, Brendolan A, Dan M, Piccinni P, La Greca G (2000) Effects of different doses in continuous veno-venous haemofiltration on outcomes of acute renal failure: a prospective randomised trial. Lancet 356:26–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouman C, Kan H, Schultz M, Vroom M (2005) The removal of antibiotics during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) in critically ill patients with acute renal failure: measured versus estimated CVVH clearance (abstract). Crit Care 9:14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark WR, Ronco C (1999) CRRT efficiency and efficacy in relation to solute size. Kidney Int Suppl 72:S3–S7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schetz M, Ferdinande P, Van den BG, Verwaest C, Lauwers P (1995) Pharmacokinetics of continuous renal replacement therapy. Intensive Care Med 21:612–620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boereboom FT, Ververs FF, Blankestijn PJ, Savelkoul TJ, van Dijk A (1999) Vancomycin clearance during continuous venovenous haemofiltration in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 25:1100–1104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Matzke GR, O'Connell MB, Collins AJ, Keshaviah PR (1986) Disposition of vancomycin during hemofiltration. Clin Pharmacol Ther 40:425–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yagasaki K, Gando S, Matsuda N, Kameue T, Ishitani T, Hirano T, Iseki K (2003) Pharmacokinetics and the most suitable dosing regimen of fluconazole in critically ill patients receiving continuous hemodiafiltration. Intensive Care Med 29:1844–1848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Joos B, Schmidli M, Keusch G (1996) Pharmacokinetics of antimicrobial agents in anuric patients during continuous venovenous haemofiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant 11:1582–1585

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Matzke GR, Frye RF, Joy MS, Palevsky PM (2000) Determinants of ceftazidime clearance by continuous venovenous hemofiltration and continuous venovenous hemodialysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1639–1644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Traunmuller F, Schenk P, Mittermeyer C, Thalhammer-Scherrer R, Ratheiser K, Thalhammer F (2002) Clearance of ceftazidime during continuous venovenous haemofiltration in critically ill patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 49:129–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bellmann R, Egger P, Gritsch W, Bellmann-Weiler R, Joannidis M, Dunzendorfer S, Wiedermann C (2002) Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in patients with acute renal failure undergoing continuous venovenous haemofiltration: influence of concomitant liver cirrhosis. Acta Med Austriaca 29:112–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Malone RS, Fish DN, Abraham E, Teitelbaum I (2001) Pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin during continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:2949–2954

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Muhl E, Martens T, Iven H, Rob P, Bruch HP (2000) Influence of continuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration and continuous veno-venous haemofiltration on the pharmacokinetics of fluconazole. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 56:671–678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Valtonen M, Tiula E, Neuvonen PJ (1997) Effect of continuous venovenous haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration on the elimination of fluconazole in patients with acute renal failure. J Antimicrob Chemother 40:695–700

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shah M, Quigley R (2000) Rapid removal of vancomycin by continuous veno-venous hemofiltration. Pediatr Nephrol 14:912–915

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Uchino S, Cole L, Morimatsu H, Goldsmith D, Bellomo R (2002) Clearance of vancomycin during high-volume haemofiltration: impact of pre-dilution. Intensive Care Med 28:1664–1667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Meyer B, Ahmed eG, Delle KG, Locker GJ, Heinz G, Jaeger W, Thalhammer F (2003) How to calculate clearance of highly protein-bound drugs during continuous venovenous hemofiltration demonstrated with flucloxacillin. Kidney Blood Press Res 26:135–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cigarran-Guldris S, Brier ME, Golper TA (1991) Tobramycin clearance during simulated continuous arteriovenous hemodialysis. Contrib Nephrol 93:120–123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Matzke GR, Frye RF, Joy MS, Palevsky PM (2000) Determinants of ceftriaxone clearance by continuous venovenous hemofiltration and hemodialysis. Pharmacotherapy 20:635–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine S. C. Bouman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouman, C.S.C., van Kan, H.J.M., Koopmans, R.P. et al. Discrepancies between observed and predicted continuous venovenous hemofiltration removal of antimicrobial agents in critically ill patients and the effects on dosing. Intensive Care Med 32, 2013–2019 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0397-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0397-x

Keywords

Navigation