Abstract
Objective
To evaluate a blind ‘active’ technique for the bedside placement of post-pyloric enteral feeding tubes in a critically ill population with proven gastric ileus.
Design and setting
An open study to evaluate the success rate and duration of the technique in cardiothoracic and general intensive care units of a tertiary referral hospital.
Patients
20 consecutive, ventilated patients requiring enteral nutrition, where feeding had failed via the gastric route.
Interventions
Previously described insertion technique—the Corpak 10-10-10 protocol—for post-pyloric enteral feeding tube placement, modified after 20 min if placement had not been achieved, by insufflation of air into the stomach to promote pyloric opening.
Measurements and results
A standard protocol and a set method to identify final tube position were used in each case. In 90% (18/20) of cases tubes were placed on the first attempt, with an additional tube being successfully placed on the second attempt. The median time for tube placement was 18 min (range 3–55 min). In 20% (4/20) insufflation of air was required to aid trans-pyloric passage.
Conclusions
The previously described technique, modified by insufflation of air into the stomach in prolonged attempts to achieve trans-pyloric passage, proved to be an effective and cost efficient method to place post-pyloric enteral feeding tubes. This technique, even in the presence of gastric ileus, could be incorporated by all critical care facilities, without the need for any additional equipment or costs. This approach avoids the costs of additional equipment, time-delays and necessity to transfer the patient from the ICU for the more traditional techniques of endoscopy and radiographic screening.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Heyland DK, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH (1993) Enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a critical review of the evidence. Intensive Care Med 19:435–442
Christman JW, McCain RW (1993) A sensible approach to the nutritional support of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 19:129–136
Marik PE, Zaloga GP (2001) Early enteral nutrition in acutely ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 29:2264–2270
Lord LM, Weiser-Mainone A, Pulhamus M, Sax HC (1993) Comparison of weighted vs. unweighted enteral feeding tubes for efficacy of transpyloric intubation. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 17:271–273
Taylor B, Schallom L (2001) Bedside small bowel feeding tube placement in critically ill patients utilizing a dietitian/nurse team approach. Nutr Clin Pract 16:258–262
Thurlow PM (1986) Bedside enteral feeding tube placement into duodenum and jejunum. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 10:104–105
Welch S, Hanlon M, Waits M, Foulks C (1994) Comparison of four bedside indicators used to predict duodenal tube placement with radiography. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 18:525–530
Welch S (1996) Certification of staff nurses to insert enteral feeding tubes using a research-based procedure. Nutr Clin Pract 11:21–27
Salasadis R, Fleiszer T, Johnston R (1998) Air insufflation technique of enteral tube insertion: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med 26:1036–1039
Heiselman D, Hofer T, Vidivich R (1995) Enteral feeding tube placement success with intravenous metoclopramide administration in ICU patients. Chest 107:1686–1688
Gabriel GA, Ackermann RJ, Castresana MR (1997) A new technique for placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes using external magnetic guidance. Crit Care Med 25:641–645
Krafte-Jacobs B, Persinger M, Carver J, Moore L, Brilli R (1996) Rapid placement of transpyloric feeding tubes: A comparison of pH assisted and Standard Insertion techniques in children. Pediatrics 98:242–248
Levy H, Hayes J, Boivin M, Tomba T (2004) Transpyloric feeding tube placement in critically ill patients using electromyogram and erythromycin infusion. Chest 125:587–591
Slagt C, Innes R, Bihari D, Lawrence J, Shehabi Y (2004) A novel method for insertion of post-pyloric feeding tubes at the bedside without endoscopic or fluoroscopic assistance: a prospective study. Intensive Care Med 30:103–107
Lenart S, Polissar NL (2003) Comparison of 2 methods for postpyloric placement of enteral feeding tubes. Am J Crit Care12:357–360
NHS National Patient Safety Agency (2005) Reducing the harm caused by misplaced nasogastric feeding tubes. NHS
Metheny N, Reed L, Berglund B, Wehrle MA (1994) Visual characteristics of aspirates from feeding tubes as a method for predicting tube location. Nurse Res 43:282–287
Gharpure V, Meert KL, Sarnaik AP, Metheny NA (2000) Indicators of postpyloric feeding tube placement in children. Crit Care Med 28:2962–2966
Metheny NA, Aud MA, Ignatavicius DD (1998) Detection of improperly positioned feeding tubes. J Health Risk Manag 18:37–48
Harrison AM, Clay B, Grant MJ, Sanders SV, Webster HF, Reading JC, Dean JM, Witte MK (1997) Nonradiographic assessment of enteral feeding tube position. Crit Care Med 25:2055–2059
Acknowledgements
We thank the staff of the CICU and ICU at Derriford Hospital for all their help.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
The Corpak 10-10-10 protocol for blind insertion of nasojejunal feeding tubes at the bedside.
-
1.
Unless clinically contraindicated, 10 mg metoclopramide is given by slow intravenous injection (if not given in the preceding 4 h). Allow 10 min after the metoclopramide before commencing tube placement.
-
2.
Lubricate the end of the fine bore feeding tube with aqueous gel.
-
3.
Measure the tube from the patient's nose, via the ear, down to the xiphoid process.
-
4.
Ideally place the patient in a semi-supine position at 30°.
-
5.
Advance the tube via the nostril, aiming the tip parallel to the nasal septum and superior surface of hard palate, into the nasopharynx, until the previously measured length (approx. 40 cm) is reached.
-
6.
Confirm placement in the stomach.
-
7.
Flush the tube with 1 ml 0.9% saline to lubricate the wire within the tube.
-
8.
Advance the tube further by continued gentle pushing, pulling back if any resistance is felt, until a further 15 cm of tube has been advanced. Check tube passage.
-
9.
To do this the guide wire should be pulled back a little way (no more than 5 cm). If resistance is met when pulling back the guide wire then the tube is likely to be coiled in the stomach. This resistance can be characterized with the feeling that the guide wire is ‘popping’ when it is pulled back.
-
10.
If the tube is coiled, pull it back slowly 5 cm at a time until the wire can be manipulated freely.
-
11.
Continue to advance the tube again slowly but again check at 70, 75, 80, 85, 90 and 95 cm to ensure that the tube has not become coiled. Follow steps 9 and 10.
-
12.
Once the 95-cm point has been reached without the tube becoming coiled, the tube can be advanced slowly to 105 cm to ensure successful placement in the jejunum.
-
13.
If the procedure has been underway for more than 20 min, 200 ml air should be insufflated into the stomach via the NG tube. Further attempts to pass the tube should be made for 20 min.
-
14.
Final tube placement confirmation:
-
If on aspiration there is a high volume of air (> 20 ml) it is likely that the tube remains in either the oesophagus or the upper portion of the stomach.
-
If on aspiration 20 ml or more of secretions is obtained, the tube is most likely to be in the stomach. These secretions usually have a pH < 5.0.
-
If no more than 5–10 ml bright yellow secretions is obtained, the tube is likely to be in the small bowel. Secretions from the small bowel should be pH 6–7.
-
If no secretions are obtained, bolus 10 ml air down the tube. If on attempted aspiration resistance is met, the tube can be judged to be in the small bowel.
-
Flush the tube with 10 ml 0.9% saline. If less than 5 ml can be aspirated easily, the tube is likely to be in the small bowel.
-
-
15.
Remove the guide wire. If the wire has maintained its smooth appearance, the tube can be judged to be in the small bowel. Secure the tube to the side of the patient's head.
-
16.
Request confirmation of placement by upper abdominal radiography. The tube is radio-opaque even with the guidewire removed. The tube is seen to cross the midline from patient's left to right, and then to cross again from right to left if placement into the jejunum has been successful.
-
17.
Once placement has been confirmed, restart feeding via the NG route. Leave the NG tube in situ and aspirate it 4 hly to identify reflux of feed, back into the stomach.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, A.J., Eve, R. & Bennett, M.J. Evaluation of a technique for blind placement of post-pyloric feeding tubes in intensive care: application in patients with gastric ileus. Intensive Care Med 32, 553–556 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0095-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-006-0095-8