Introduction

Hyperglycemia is a well known concern in multiple-trauma patients [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. As a result of the hormonal and metabolic changes that accompany the “stress response” hyperglycemia frequently occurs in multiple trauma patients, and blood glucose levels have recently been proposed to be a main outcome predictor [1]. In the setting of multiple trauma and other severe acute disorder states hyperglycemia appears to predispose to infections, polyneuropathy, catabolism, multiorgan failure, and death [2, 3, 4, 5]. Prior work has shown a reduction in mortality and morbidity by lowering the level of blood glucose using intensive insulin therapy in patients after surgery [1]. The aim of this pilot study was to test the safety of an olive oil lipid-based vs. a conventional glucose-based parenteral/enteral nutrition regimen and its effect on blood glucose, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay. For lipid emulsions based on soybean oil an increased susceptibility to infections has been suggested [7, 8]. We therefore recorded infectious complications and measured the expression of human leukocyte antigen group DR (HLA-DR) on blood monocytes.

Patients and methods

The baseline characteristics of the 33 randomized patients are shown in Table 1. The study was performed between August 2001 and December 2002 with approval from the Ethics Committee of the University of Witten/Herdecke, Germany. The study design was open-label, prospective, and randomized. Informed consent was obtained from a guardian and/or relative. Inclusion criteria were major trauma and Injury Severity Score of 16 or higher, requirement of mechanical ventilation, patient age between 18 and 80 years, and admission within 24 h after trauma. Exclusion criteria were unstable hemodynamics, uncorrected lactate acidosis, known disorder of lipid metabolism, severe obesity (body mass index ≥ 40), known alcoholism, and allergy to the used lipid emulsions.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 33 multiple trauma patients receiving intensive care unit treatment (AIS Abbreviated Injury Scale, APACHE Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, ISS Injury Severity Score) (parentheses range)

All study patients were included on the day of the trauma (study day 0). After meeting the inclusion criteria, and informed consent had been obtained, the patients were randomly assigned to receive either a lipid-based (L group) or a glucose-based (G group) nutrition. The study nutrition started on the day (study day 1) following the trauma with 50% of the energy demand, increasing to 75% on day 2, and 100% on day 3. L group patients received a parenteral lipid-based nutrition with a lipid/glucose ratio (percentage kcal/percentage kcal of nonprotein energy) of 75/25; the remaining 15 patients (G group) were given a standard parenteral glucose-based nutrition with a lipid/glucose ratio of 37/63. No other sources of glucose (i.e., intravenous solutions, minibags) were given. Both groups received 20% of their parenteral energy supply as amino acids. To avoid a high intake of n-6-fatty acids L group patients received a fat emulsion based on olive oil (ClinOleic 20%, Baxter, Germany); in the G group a standard soybean derived emulsion (Lipofundin N 20%, B. Braun, Germany) was given. The parenteral nutrition was given continuously over 24 h. Enteral nutrition was started on day 1 with a daily maximum of 5 kcal/kg during the first 6 days. The L group also received an enteral diet containing high fat based on olive oil (lipid/glucose 60/40; Glucerna, Abbott, Germany); the G group received an enteral standard diet (lipid/glucose 44/56; Fresubin HP energy, Fresenius, Germany). After day 6 the parenteral energy supply was reduced while the enteral energy was increased dependent on the patients gastrointestinal tolerability. The same enteral diet products (L group Glucerna, G group Fresubin HP energy) were given throughout the study. Gastrointestinal tolerability was assumed when gastric residual volumes were below 200 ml after a 3-h enteral nutrition intermission. Until the gastrointestinal tolerability was reached, a “trickle feed” (20 ml enteral solution plus 20 ml water) was given. The enteral nutrition was given in hourly boluses between 8 a.m. and 10 p.m.

The daily energy requirement was estimated by continuous indirect calorimetry (DeltaTrak II, Datex, Finland) for at least 8 h per day using the respirator mode. On day 1 the indirect calorimetry was started before giving nutrition support. Patients were extubated after 24 h of spontaneous breathing. After extubation both the indirect calorimetry and the mechanical ventilation ended. Because we did not use the canopy for indirect calorimetry in spontaneously breathing patients, the last measured energy requirement value was carried forward for the following days.

Blood triglycerides were measured each morning under continuous infusion conditions. Blood glucose was calculated as the mean of multiple daily measurements (minimum of three, maximum of six measurements) using point-of-care devices (AVL OMNI 9, Roche Diagnostics). Intravenous insulin was given if the blood glucose exceeded 10 mmol/l. After decreasing the blood glucose below 10 mmol/l the infusion of insulin was stopped. The given values were calculated only for days on which insulin was given. Nitrogen balance was calculated by assessing the daily N-intake and urea excretion in the 24-h urine. Carbon dioxide production and minute volume were estimated by using the continuous indirect calorimetry while the patients were on respirator therapy.

By study design the staff responsibilities for nutrition therapy and intensive care therapy were held separate. The ward physician was not involved in the nutrition therapy. In turn, all decisions regarding extubation or discharge of the patients were taken by the ward physician unaware of the nutrition regimen.

The two groups did not differ significantly in age, gender, body mass index, need for transfusion, number of surgical procedures, or clinical scores. Injury to the head and chest were main cause of prolonged artificial ventilation. Neither Abbreviated Injury Scale subscore differed significantly between groups at baseline (head: L group 3.1±1.7 and G group 2.7±2.1, p=0.57; chest: L group 2.4±1.8 and G group 2.7±1.8, p=0.73).

The expression of HLA-DR on CD14+ monocytes was evaluated on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 after trauma by fluorescence activated cell scanning; for this we used antibodies labeled on a protein/fluorophore ratio of 1/1 (QuantiBRITE reagents, BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). The measurement of multilevel calibrated QuantiBRITE fluorescent beads allows the construction of a calibration curve for antigen quantification. Fifteen healthy individuals with a mean age of 32.8±2.8 years (range 23–67) served as controls.

The clinical outcome at discharge from the acute care hospital was determined by the Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index (ERI). The modified ERI assesses the need for medical or geriatric care and disability on a scale ranging from minus 325 to plus 100 points. A value of plus 100 indicates complete independence in all daily activities [9]. The mortality was recorded at 6 months after the trauma.

All values are given as mean ±standard deviation. All analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Statistical analyses used the software package SPSS 11.0 (SPSS, Munich, Germany). Graphs show mean ±standard error of the mean. Differences in baseline and outcome parameters were compared using the unpaired Student’s t test, Mann-Whitney U test, or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate.

Results

The resting energy expenditure (REE, measured on day 0) and the energy expenditure (EE) on the following days was similar in the two groups (Table 2). The total energy intake (EI) is shown in Fig. 1. No significant difference between the EI/EE ratio was observed (L 0.75±0.17, G 0.86±0.26, p=0.24). The cumulative daily total mean energy intake was significantly lower in the L group (L 17.9±6.3, G 22.3±4.2 kcal/kg, p=0.03). There was no significant difference between groups in daily enteral energy intake (L 4.5±5.2, G 5.9±4.6 kcal/kg, p=0.41). Three patients were intolerant to enteral feeding within the first 3 days (one in the L group, two in the G group). The daily parenteral glucose intake (L 0.8±0.3, G 2.0±0.6 g/kg, p<0.001) was higher in the G group. The daily parenteral lipid intake was higher in the L group (L 0.8±0.3, G 0.5±0.1 g/kg, p<0.001). The daily intravenous amino acid supply showed no significant difference between groups (L 0.7±0.2, G 0.8±0.2 kcal/kg, p=0.17). Eight patients were discharged from the ICU before day 14 (seven in the L group, one in the G group). Reasons for discharge were clinical improvement (six in the L group, one in the G group). One patient in the L group was excluded from the study after disclosure of a fat metabolism disorder (protocol violation). One patient in the L group died on day 3. The number of treated patients at each day is indicated in the graphs.

Table 2 Metabolic parameters of 33 multiple trauma patients. Blood triglycerides were measured daily. Blood glucose was calculated as the mean of multiple daily measurements (minimum of 3, maximum of 6 measurements). Nitrogen balance was calculated by assessing the daily N-intake and urea excretion in the 24-h urine. Energy expenditure, carbon dioxide production, oxygen consumption, and minute volume were estimated by using the continuous indirect calorimetry while the patients were on respirator and nutrition therapy (parentheses range)
Fig. 1
figure 1

Daily total amount of calories delivered per kg in the lipid (circles) and the glucose group (triangles). Values are mean ±SEM and calculated from the parenteral and enteral energy intake; n number of patients

Mean blood glucose levels in the L group were significantly lower than in the G group (Table 2). Whereas in the L group blood glucose was stable at approx. 7 mmol/l, glucose values increased in the G group after day 4 to stay above 9 mmol/l until day 11 (Fig. 2). In the L group 5 of 18 patients required insulin and in the G group 9 of 15 (p=0.09). The mean use of insulin in the L group was 55.8±46.0 IE and in the G group 65.3±42.0 IE (p=0.70). One diabetic patient in the L group had a history of 90 IE insulin per day before trauma. Of the daily recorded minimal blood glucose measurements (n=380 in the L group, n=412 in the G group) one value in an L group patient was under 3.5 mmol/l.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Blood glucose level in the lipid (circles) and the glucose group (triangles). Values are mean ±SEM and the mean of multiple daily measurements (minimum of three, maximum of six measurements); n number of patients. *p<0.05, **p<0.01

Blood triglyceride levels did not differ significantly between groups (Table 2). Nitrogen balance was negative in both groups and showed no significant difference (Table 2). The carbon dioxide production, total respiratory quotient, and minute volume were significantly reduced in the lipid group (Table 2). Four patients in the lipid and two in the glucose group had no indirect calorimetry. No patient had to be excluded from indirect calorimetry assessment for reasons of high fraction of inspired oxygen.

The duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay in the ICU was significantly shorter in the L group. Infectious complications were less frequent in the L group (Fig. 3). The length of stay in the acute care hospital did not differ significantly between groups (Table 3). The modified ERI at discharge from the acute care hospital showed no significant difference between groups (L 2.5±120, G 25±64, p=0.99). Within 6 months after trauma four patients in the L group and one in the G group died (p=0.35). One patient in the L group died due to his severe head trauma on day 3. Another patient in the L group died due to sepsis after bronchopneumonia on day 19. Two patients in the L group died on day 41 and 50, and the patient in the G group died on day 47 at a nursing home. In the latter three cases the cause of death was unspecified.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Sepsis score according to Elebute and Stoner in the lipid (circles) and the glucose group (triangles). Values are mean ±SEM; n=number of patients. *p<0.05

Table 3 Duration of mechanical ventilation, stay in intensive care unit, and total acute care hospital stay in 33 multiple trauma patients (parentheses range)

Monocytic HLA-DR on admission was significantly lower than in controls (9,890±4,010 ABC vs. 29,881±8,060 ABC, p<0.001). There was no difference between groups in monocytic HLA-DR expression at admission. The time course of monocytic HLA-DR expression is shown in Fig. 4; monocytic HLA-DR expression increased to values in the lower range of healthy volunteers on day 14. Patients in the L group showed a faster, albeit statistically nonsignificant, improvement in monocytic HLA-DR than those in the G group.

Fig. 4
figure 4

HLA-DR expression on CD14+ blood monocytes in the lipid (circles) and the glucose group (triangle). All results are expressed as antibodies bound per cell (ABC, mean ±SEM). Gray area Values of age-matched healthy volunteers with 25th percentile (P25), 50th percentile (P50), and 75th percentile (P75); n number of patients

Discussion

Our findings show a good tolerance of an olive oil based high lipid nutrition regimen in multiple trauma patients. Further, our data confirm prior reports showing a decrease in blood glucose and CO2 production [10, 11], good tolerance [10, 11, 12, 13], and reduced time on mechanical ventilation [10] under lipid-based nutrition in ICU treated patients. Furthermore, our findings of abbreviated ICU times may support the notion of a positive clinical effect of lower blood glucose regimen [1].

The main causes of ventilator support in multiple trauma patients are chest/lung and craniocerebral traumata, these have a similar frequency and often coexisting in our patients. The differential effects of central and/or peripheral respiratory failure could therefore not be determined in our study. Prior work has suggested an improved pulmonary function especially in patients with preexisting lung disease under a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet [14, 15]. In general the objectives of mechanical ventilation in severe trauma patients are an adequate delivery of oxygen and elimination of CO2. Elevated CO2 production is accompanied by an increase in minute ventilation [16], higher risk of pulmonary overdistention, higher mortality, and longer time on respirator [17]. Therefore a lower CO2 production can be considered beneficial. In our study the observed decrease in CO2 production was 14% (95% confidence interval, CI, 2–26%), and the decrease in minute volume was 13% (95% CI 1–25%). Assuming a total combustion of 2,000 kcal (1,500 parenteral, 500 enteral), according to our study protocol per day CO2 production would have been 325 and 349 l in L and G group patients, respectively (expected difference of 7%, 95% CI 6–8%). Given the difference in expected vs. observed point estimates (however, not significant by 95% CI) the effect of factors such as severity and pattern of injury, body temperature, caloric intake and use of sedation as well as an effect of the lower, i.e., hypocaloric, energy intake in the L group may be considered.

Despite lower glucose levels in our L group cases (as expected with lower glucose intakes), blood glucose values still ranged above normal, leaving open the possibility for further beneficial effects of more forceful approaches to blood glucose normalization in severe trauma cases. Further studies using lipid-based nutrition also found slightly elevated blood glucose values ranging from 6 to 8 mmol/l (compared to glucose-based nutrition with values from 8 to 10 mmol/l) [11, 13]. Studies using intensive insulin therapy achieved blood glucose values below 6 mmol/l [1]; i.e., within the range of normal. Furthermore, the work by Tappy et al. [11, 18] has shown in critical illness an independence of endogenous glucose production from parenteral [11] and enteral [18] glucose supply.

Lipid emulsions have been suggested to influence inflammation processes [19], affecting the level of metabolic activation including CO2 production. The underlying mechanism is due mainly to the type and quantity of administered fatty acids which act as precursor in the eicosanoid metabolism. Modifying the n-6/n-3 ratio has both rapid and persistent effects on inflammatory and immune responses [20]. The lipid emulsion used in our L group patients is containing 80% olive oil and 20% soybean oil. It was developed with the rationale to decrease the polyunsaturated fatty acids content of soybean emulsions and replace it with mainly oleic acid (C18:1 n-9). This preparation is considered not to affect membrane composition and therefore to have little effect on eicosanoid production and the immune response [21] followed by a reduced need for antioxidants. In preterm infants, who are often exposed to oxidative stress, an improvement in the antioxidant status using an olive oil based lipid emulsion has been shown [22]. Our nutrition regimen in the L group patients resulted in a significantly increased monounsaturated fatty acid intake accompanied by a decreased polyunsaturated fatty acid intake.

The lower rate of infectious complications in the L group is in contrast to previous studies mainly using soybean derived lipid emulsion [7, 23, 24]. The authors offer the argument that the known negative immune effects of n-6 fatty acids [8, 25] may be avoided with the n-9 fatty acids used in our study.

Since the principal aim of this pilot study was to investigate the tolerance of such a regimen, we decided to investigate the monocytic HLA-DR expression—a general measure of immunodeficiency after major trauma—instead of analyzing fatty acid metabolites. Prior work proposed an association of low monocytic HLA-DR expression with the risk of infection and clinical outcome [26]. In our pilot study the difference in improvement in monocytic HLA-DR expression between groups, although not significant, suggests a possible positive effect of olive oil lipid-based nutrition [19, 27].

Prior work suggested negative effects of long-chain triglyceride emulsions on the reticuloendothelial system function [28], an induction of hypertriglyceridemia, and adverse impacts on pulmonary gas diffusion [29]. The disturbances in reticuloendothelial system function and hypertriglyceridemia have been considered to be pronounced in critical illness and have been associated with the rapid and intermittent infusion of the lipid emulsions [30]. With the use of indirect calorimetry for the determination of the daily energy goal and a continuous lipid infusion regimen we minimized the risk of an overdose of intravenous lipids. Despite the high percentage of lipid calories in our olive-oil based nutritional regimen, the mean hourly lipid doses of 0.03 g/kg given in the L group were lower than the 0.11 g/kg lipid infusion doses considered toxic by prior authors [31]. The negative changes in pulmonary gas diffusion under the infusion of lipid emulsions have been linked to the supplementation of prostaglandin precursors as linoleic acid [30]. One goal of our study was to reduce the linoleic acid intake.

Regarding clinical outcome the modified ERI at discharge from the acute care hospital did not show a significant difference between groups. Our mortality point estimate of 12% (95% CI 1–23%) was similar to the 10% given in the trauma register of the German Society of Traumatology [32].

Our findings suggest a good tolerance of a high lipid nutrition based on olive-oil resulting in a decrease in blood glucose, a clinically relevant shortening of ICU stay, and shortening of the time on mechanical ventilation for severe trauma patients treated with lipid-based than with conventional glucose-heavy nutrition regimen. Further studies in larger patient samples are needed to test the effect of lipid-based nutrition on clinical outcome.