Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Indwelling time and risk of infection of dialysis catheters in critically ill cancer patients

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Despite the lack of evidence to support routine scheduled replacement of dialysis catheters (DCs) this practice continues to be widely used in many intensive care units (ICUs). This study evaluated whether additional risks of catheter-related infection (CRI) are incurred with a conservative attitude in critically ill cancer patients.

Design and setting

Prospective, observational study over a 14-month period in a 15-bed medicosurgical unit in a comprehensive cancer center.

Patients

Seventy-nine double-lumen DCs were evaluated in 47 patients. Incidence rates of infection per 1000 days of catheter use were examined over 7-day periods.

Measurements and results

The mean indwelling time was 6.9±5.5 days. Twelve DCs (15.2%) were removed for suspected CRI. Catheter-tip cultures remained negative in 74 cases (93.7%). Overall, one bacteremic CRI, two colonization episodes, and two contaminations were diagnosed, leading to DC colonization and DC-related bacteremia incidence rates of, respectively, 5.4 and 1.8 per 1000 days. When the catheter colonization rate was examined at 7-day intervals, the incidence rate was similar whatever the indwelling time: 5.8, 4.8, and 6.0 per 1000 days, respectively, for the 49 catheters left in place for 7 days or less, 8–14 days (21 DCs), and more than 14 days (9 DCs). The DC colonization incidence rate was similar to that of the 42 short-term catheters inserted during the same period in the same patients (5.9 per 1000 days).

Conclusions

The stable low risk for DC-related infections over time does not support the rationale for scheduled replacement, even in immunocompromised cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, Gerberding JL, Heard SO, Maki DG, Masur H, McCormick RD, Mermel LA, Pearson ML, Raad II, Randolph A, Weinstein RA (2002) Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 23:759–769

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rubinson L, Haponik EF, Wu AW, Diette GB (2003) Internists’ adherence to guidelines for prevention of intravascular catheter infections. JAMA 290:2802

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cyna AM, Hovenden JL, Lehmann A, Rajaseker K, Kalia P (1998) Routine replacement of central venous catheters: telephone survey of intensive care units in mainland Britain. BMJ 316:1944–1945

    Google Scholar 

  4. Souweine B, Traore O, Aublet-Cuvelier B, Badrikian L, Bret L, Sirot J, Gazuy N, Laveran H, Deteix P (1999) Dialysis and central venous catheter infections in critically ill patients: results of a prospective study. Crit Care Med 27:2394–2398

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wester JPJ, de Koning EJP, Geers ABM, Vincent HH, de Jongh BM, Tersmette M, Leusink JA (2002) Catheter replacement in continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration: the balance between infectious and mechanical complications. Crit Care Med 30:1261–1266

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blot F, Guiguet M, Nitenberg G, Leclercq B, Gachot B, Escudier B (1997) Prognostic factors for neutropenic patients in an intensive care unit. Respective roles of underlying malignancies and acute organ failures. Eur J Cancer 33:1031–1037

    Google Scholar 

  7. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963

    Google Scholar 

  8. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) Prognosis in acute organ-system failure. Ann Surg 11:685–693

    Google Scholar 

  9. Raad II, Hohn DC, Gilbreath BJ, Suleiman N, Hill LA, Bruso PA, Marts K, Mansfield PF, Bodey GP (1994) Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 15:231–238

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blot F, Chachaty E, Raynard B, Antoun S, Bourgain JL, Nitenberg G (2001) Mechanisms and risk factors for infection of pulmonary artery catheters and introducer sheaths in cancer patients admitted to an intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect 48:289–297

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brun-Buisson C, Abrouk F, Legrand P, Huet Y, Larabi S, Rapin M (1987) Diagnosis of central venous catheter-related sepsis. Critical level of quantitative tip cultures. Arch Intern Med 147:873–877

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blot F, Nitenberg G, Chachaty E,Raynard B,Germann N,Antoun S,Laplanche A,Brun-Buisson C, Tancrède C (1999) Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia: a prospective comparison of the time to positivity of central vs. peripheral blood cultures. Lancet 354:1071–1077

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rijnders, B. J, W. E. Peetermans et al (2004) Watchful waiting versus immediate catheter removal in ICU patients with suspected catheter-related infection: a randomized trial. Intensive Care Med 30:1073–1080

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brun-Buisson, C (2004) Suspected central venous catheter-associated infection: can the catheter be safely retained? Intensive Care Med 30:1005–1007

    Google Scholar 

  15. Uldall PR, Merchant N, Woods F, Yarworski U, Vas S (1981) Changing subclavian haemodialysis cannulas to reduce infection. Lancet 8234:1373

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cook D, Randolph A et al (1997) Central venous catheter replacement strategies: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 25:1417–24

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pronovost PJ, Wu AW, Sexton JB (2004) Acute decompensation after removing a central line: practical approaches to increasing safety in the intensive care unit. Ann Intern Med 140:1025–1033

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nitenberg G, Blot F (2004) Diagnosis of catheter-related infections. In: O’ Grady, Pittet (eds) Catheter-related infections in the critically ill, 2nd edn. Kluwer, Boston, pp 59–76

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms L. Saint-Ange for editing, and the following nurses for their care and attention during their daily participation in this work: M. Minet (head nurse), M. Courchinoux-Nasri, I. Rousseau, V. Marchand, N. Torri-Piqueras, E. Moulon, C. Briant-Monplaisir, E. Lenoir-Fleury, and their colleagues.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805, Villejuif, France

    Abbas Harb, Georges Estphan, Gérard Nitenberg, Bruno Raynard & François Blot

  2. Service de Microbiologie Médicale, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805, Villejuif, France

    Elisabeth Chachaty

Authors
  1. Abbas Harb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Georges Estphan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gérard Nitenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elisabeth Chachaty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bruno Raynard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. François Blot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gérard Nitenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harb, A., Estphan, G., Nitenberg, G. et al. Indwelling time and risk of infection of dialysis catheters in critically ill cancer patients. Intensive Care Med 31, 812–817 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2621-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2621-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation