Skip to main content
Log in

Economies of scale in British intensive care units and combined intensive care/high dependency units

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To estimate the relationship between size of intensive care unit and combined intensive care/high dependency units and average costs per patient day.

Design

Retrospective data analysis. Multiple regression of average costs on critical care unit size, controlling for teaching status, type of unit, occupancy rate and average length of stay.

Setting

Seventy-two United Kingdom adult intensive care and combined intensive care/high dependency units submitting expenditure data for the financial year 2000–2001 as part of the Critical Care National Cost Block Programme.

Interventions

None.

Measurements and results

The main outcome measures were total cost per patient day and the following components: staffing cost, consumables cost and clinical support services costs. Nursing Whole Time Equivalents per patient day were recorded. The unit size variable has a negative and statistically significant (p<0.05) coefficient in regressions for total, staffing and consumables cost. The predicted average cost for a seven-bed unit is about 96% of that predicted for a six-bed critical care unit.

Conclusion

Policy makers should consider the possibility of economies of scale in planning intensive care and combined intensive care/high dependency units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gyldmark M (1995) A review of cost studies of intensive care units: problems with the cost concept. Crit Care Med 23:964–972

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Metcalfe A, McPherson K (1995) Study of provision of intensive care in England, 1993: revised report for Department of Health—January 1995. Report for Department of Health

  3. National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths (NCEPOD) (2000). Functioning as a team: the 2002 report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths. NCEPOD, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Audit Commission (1999) Critical to success: national report. Audit Commission, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Department of Health (2000) Comprehensive critical care: a review of adult critical care services. DOH, London. www.doh.gov.uk/nhsexec/compcritcare.htm. Accessed 15 August 2003

    Google Scholar 

  6. Groeger JS, Strosberg MA, Halpern NA, Raphaely RC, Kaye WE, Guntupalli KK, Bertram DL, Greenbaum DM, Clemmer TP, Gallagher TJ et al. (1992) Descriptive analysis of critical care units in the United States. Crit Care Med 20:846–863

    Google Scholar 

  7. Long MJ, Ament RP, Dreachslin JL, Kobrinski EJ (1985) A reconsideration of economies of scale in the health care field. Health Policy 5:25–44

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chang C, Tuckman HP (1986) Will economies of scale always reduce cost? An economic analysis of the effects of hospital expansion. J Health Hum Resources Admin 8:249–261

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tibi-Levy Y, de Pouvourville G, Rozenholc Y, Goursot G, Clergue F, Delemontey B, Feiss P, Laxenaire MC, Marty J, Beresniak A (1998) Evaluation of benefits related to reduced length of stays in postanesthesia care units. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 14:172–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dranove D (1996) Economies of scale in non-revenue producing cost centers; implications for hospital mergers. J Health Econ 15:685–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fordham R, Field DJ, Hodges S, Normand C, Mason E, Burton P, Yates J, Male S (1992) Cost of neonatal care across a regional health authority. J Public Health Med 14:127–130

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Edbrooke D, Hibbert C, Ridley S, Long T, Dickie H (1999) The development of a method for comparative costing of individual intensive care units. The Intensive Care Working Group on Costing. Anaesthesia. 54:110–120

  13. Dean JE, Edbrooke DL, Corcoran M (2002) The critical care national cost block programme: implementing a standard costing methodology on a national scale. Care of the Critically Ill 18 No.3, Stockton Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jacobs P, Edbrooke DL, Hibbert CL, Fassbender K, Corcoran MC (2001) Descriptive patient data as an explanation for the variation in average daily costs in intensive care. Anaesthesia 56:643–647

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rapoport J, Teres D, Zhao Y, Lemeshow S (2003) Length of stay data as a guide to hospital economic performance for ICU patients. Med Care 41:386–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reis Miranda D, Willams A, Loirat Ph (eds) (1990) Management of Intensive Care. Kluwer, Amsterdam

  17. Jones J, Rowan K (1995) Is there a relationship between the volume of work carried out in intensive care and its outcomes? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 11(4):762–769

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Jacobs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobs, P., Rapoport, J. & Edbrooke, D. Economies of scale in British intensive care units and combined intensive care/high dependency units. Intensive Care Med 30, 660–664 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-2123-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-2123-2

Keywords

Navigation