Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tracheostomy for long-term ventilated patients: a postal survey of ICU practice in The Netherlands

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the frequency, timing, technique, and follow-up of tracheostomy for long-term ventilated patients in different intensive care units (ICUs) in The Netherlands.

Design and setting

Postal questionnaire, survey on retrospective data. A questionnaire was sent to all (n=63) ICUs with six or more beds suitable for mechanical ventilation and officially recognized by The Netherlands Intensive Care Society. Pediatric ICUs were excluded.

Measurements and results

There was an 87% (n=55) response rate of contacted ICUs. The number of tracheostomies per year per unit varied widely (range 1–75), most ICUs (42%) performing between 11 and 25 tracheostomies per year. In 44% of ICUs (n=24) tracheostomy was not performed on a routine basis. In 25% of ICUs (n=14) tracheostomies were performed during the second week of ventilation. Surgical tracheostomy and percutaneous procedures were technique of first choice in 38% and 62% of ICUs, respectively. In only 7% of units were late follow-up protocols in use. Thirty-two units (58%) reported a total of 56 major complications.

Conclusions

Timing and technique of tracheostomy varies widely in Dutch ICUs. The percutaneous technique is the procedure of choice for tracheostomy in most of these units. Late follow-up protocols are rarely in use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

References

  1. Graamans K, Pirsig W, Biefel K (1999) The shift in the indications for the tracheotomy between 1940 and 1955: an historical review. J Laryngol Otol 113:624–627

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ciaglia P, Firsching R, Syniec C (1985) Elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A new simple bedside procedure; preliminary report. Chest 87:715–719

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Byhahn C, Lischke V, Halbig S, Scheifler G, Westphal K (2000) [Ciaglia Blue Rhino: a modified technique for percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy. Technique and early clinical results]. Anaesthesist 49:202–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Griggs WM, Worthley LI, Gilligan JE, Thomas PD, Myburg JA (1990) A simple percutaneous tracheostomy technique. Surg Gynecol Obstet 170:543–545

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maziak DE, Meade MO, Todd TR (1998) The timing of tracheotomy: a systematic review. Chest 114:605–609

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dulguerov P, Gysin C, Perneger TV, Chevrolet JC (1999) Percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 27:1617–1625

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Freeman BD, Isabella K, Lin N, Buchman TG (2000) A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Chest 118:1412–1418

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng E, Fee WE Jr (2000) Dilatational versus standard tracheostomy: a meta-analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 109:803–807

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Susanto I (2002) Comparing percutaneous tracheostomy with open surgical tracheostomy. BMJ 324:3–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fischler L, Erhart S, Kleger GR, Frutiger A (2000) Prevalence of tracheostomy in ICU patients. A nation-wide survey in Switzerland. Intensive Care Med 26:1428–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Westphal K, Byhahn C (2001) [Update 2000: tracheostomy on German intensive care units]. Anaesthesiol Intensivmedizin 42:70–74

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper RM (1998) Use and safety of percutaneous tracheostomy in intensive care. Report of a postal survey of ICU practice. Anaesthesia 53:1209–1212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wise H (2002) Experience of complications of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Anaesthesia 57:195–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dollner R, Verch M, Schweiger P, Deluigi C, Graf B, Wallner F (2002) Laryngotracheoscopic findings in long-term follow-up after Griggs tracheostomy. Chest 122:206–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. E.N. Robertson and Dr. O.H.G. Wilder-Smith for the review of the text and language editing. The study received no external financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Bernard G. Fikkers, Johannes G. van der Hoeven & Inge S. Briedé

  2. Department of Medical Technology Assessment, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Gerdine A. J. Fransen

  3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Frank J. A. van den Hoogen

Authors
  1. Bernard G. Fikkers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gerdine A. J. Fransen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Johannes G. van der Hoeven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Inge S. Briedé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Frank J. A. van den Hoogen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard G. Fikkers.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fikkers, B.G., Fransen, G.A.J., van der Hoeven, J.G. et al. Tracheostomy for long-term ventilated patients: a postal survey of ICU practice in The Netherlands. Intensive Care Med 29, 1390–1393 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1824-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1824-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation