Skip to main content
Log in

The functional outcome and quality of life of children after admission to an intensive care unit

  • Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the long-term outcome of children following admission to a paediatric intensive care unit.

Design

Prospective, long-term follow-up study.

Setting

Sixteen-bed multi-disciplinary paediatric intensive care unit in a free-standing, university, tertiary, teaching hospital.

Patients

All children consecutively admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit from 1st January, 1995, to 31st December, 1995.

Interventions

Outcome was evaluated, by telephone interview, at a median of 3.5 years (range 2.3–6 years) after admission to the intensive care unit using a modification of the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) to assess functional outcome and the Health State Utility Index (Mark 1) to assess quality of life.

Measurements and main results

Of the children admitted to the intensive care unit, 83.8% were alive at the time of follow-up. While 10.3% of the survivors had an unfavourable outcome and were likely to live dependent on care, 89.7% had a favourable outcome and were likely to lead an independent existence. Although 16.4% had an unfavourable quality of life, 83.6% of the children survived with a favourable quality of life. At the time of follow-up, 16.2% of the children were dead: 49% died in the intensive care unit, 5% died in hospital and 46% died after discharge from hospital.

Conclusions

The majority of children admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit survive with an excellent functional outcome and quality of life. Long-term outcome assessment provides a basis for observing trends in outcome over time within the same institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tilford JM, Roberson PK, Lensing SMS, Fiser DH (1998) Differences in pediatric ICU mortality risk over time. Crit Care Med 26:1737–1743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lansky D, Butler JBV, Waller FT (1992) Using health status measure in the hospital setting: from acute care to 'Outcomes Management'. Med Care 30:MS57–MS73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein AM (1990) The outcomes movement—will it get us where we want to go? N Engl J Med 323:266–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Butt W, Shann F, Tibballs J, Williams J, Cuddihy L, Blewett L, Farley M (1990) Long–term outcome of children after intensive care. Crit Care Med 18:961–965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gemke RJBJ, Bonsel GJ, van Vught AJ (1995) Long term survival and state of health after paediatric intensive care. Arch Dis Child 73:196–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Torres A, Pickert CB, Firestone J, Walker WM, Fiser DH (1997) Long-term functional outcome of inpatient pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Pediatr Emerg Care 13:369–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schlinder MB, Bohn D, Cox, PN, McCrindle BW, Jarvis A, Edmonds J, Barker G (1996) Outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac or respiratory arrest in children. N Engl J Med 335:1473–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carter BG, Taylor A, Butt W (1999) Severe brain injury in children: long-term outcome and its prediction using somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). Intensive Care Med 25:722–728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pollack MM, Rittimann URS Getson PR (1988) Pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score. Crit Care Med 16:1110–1116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Working Party on Brain Death and Organ Donation (1988) Report. recommendations concerning brain death and organ donation, 2nd edn. The Working Party, March 1988

  11. Torrance GW, Boyle MH, Howood SP (1982) Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states. Oper Res 30:1043–1069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lohr KN (1988) Outcome measurement: concepts and questions. Inquiry 25:37–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Keith RA (1995) Conceptual basis of outcome measures. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 74:73–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Greenfield S, Nelson EC (1992) Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. Med Care 30:23–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maas AIR, Braakman R, Schouten HJA, Minderhoud JM, van Zomeren AH (1983) Agreement between physicians on assessment of outcome following severe head injury. J Neurosurg 58:321–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pantell RH, Lewis CC (1987) Measuring the impact of medical care on children. J Chron Dis 40:99S–108S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Whiteman D, Green A (1997) Wherein lies the truth? Assessment of agreement between parent proxy and child respondents. Int J Epidemiol 26:855–859

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Theunissen NC, Vogels TG, Koopman HM, Verrips GH, Zwinderman KA, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Wit JM (1998) The proxy problem: child report versus parent report in health-related quality of life research. Qual Life Res 7:387–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor A, Butt W (2000) The evaluation of outcome following paediatric intensive care: the major issues identified. Clin Intensive Care 11:239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS (1987)The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil 1:6–18

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hellawell DJ, Signorini DF (1997) The Edinburgh extended Glasgow outcome scale (EEGOS): rationale and pilot studies. Int J Rehabil Res 20:345–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lindsay Wilson JT, Pettigrew LEL, Teasdale GM (1998) Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 15:573–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jennett B, Bond M (1975) Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1:480–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Feeny D, Furlong W, Barr RD, Torrance GW, Rosenbaum P, Weitzman S (1992) A comprehensive multi-attribute system for classifying the health status of survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 10:923–928

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D, Boyle MH (1992) Provisional health status index for the Ontario Health Survey. Final report submitted to Statistics Canada. (Contract 44400900187) Hamilton, Ontario: Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University

  26. Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher A, Gore S, Jones D, Spiegelhalter D, Cox D (1992) Quality of life measure in health care. Part I: Applications and issues in assessment. BMJ 305:1074–1077

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Warwick Butt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, A., Butt, W. & Ciardulli, M. The functional outcome and quality of life of children after admission to an intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 29, 795–800 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1690-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1690-6

Keywords

Navigation