Skip to main content
Log in

Are we doing a good job: PRISM, PIM and all that

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Teres D, Lemeshow S (1994) Why severity models should be used with caution. Crit Care Clin 10:93–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pollack MM, Patel KM, Ruttimann UE (1996) PRISM III: an updated paediatric risk of mortality score. Crit Care Med 24:743–752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shann F, Pearson G, Slater A, Wilkinson K (1997) Paediatric index of mortality (PIM): a mortality prediction model for children in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 23:201–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gemke R, Van Vught J (2002) Scoring systems in pediatric intensive care: PRISM III versus PIM. Intensive Care Med DOI 10.1007/s00134–001-1185–2

  5. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Bertolini G, D’Amico R, Nardi D, Tinazzi A, Apolone G (2000) One model, several results: the paradox of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for the logistic regression model. J Epidemiol Biostatistics 5:251–253

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shann, F. Are we doing a good job: PRISM, PIM and all that. Intensive Care Med 28, 105–107 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-001-1186-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-001-1186-1

Navigation