Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Die lumbale Spondylodese stellt ein etabliertes Operationsverfahren in der Wirbelsäulenchirurgie dar. Die Indikationen sind alle Arten von Instabilitäten des betroffenen Bewegungssegmentes. Ziel der Operation ist eine biomechanisch dauerhafte Fusion der Wirbel, welche durch verschiedene Zugangswege, Implantate und Fusionsmaterialen erreicht werden kann.
Techniken
Hauptsächlich verwendete Techniken sind die posteriore lumbale Fusion (PLF), die posteriore lumbale interkorporelle Fusion (PLIF), die transforaminale lumbale interkoporelle Fusion (TLIF), die anteriore lumbale interkorporelle Fusion (ALIF), die oblique lumbale interkorporelle Fusion (OLIF) und die extrem laterale interkorporelle Fusion (XLIF). Die Techniken sowie deren Indikationen, Komplikationen und Ergebnisse werden in dieser Übersicht beschrieben.
Abstract
Background
Lumbar spinal fusion is an established surgical technique in spine surgery. The goal of spinal fusion is a biomechanically lasting interbody union, which can be accomplished through different surgical approaches, implants and grafts.
Techniques
The mainly surgical techniques used are: posterior lumbar fusion (PLF), posterior interbody lumbar fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF). These procedures, their indications, complications and results are described in this narrative review.
Abbreviations
- ALIF:
-
Anteriore lumbale interkorporelle Fusion
- BMP :
-
„Bone morphogenetic proteins“
- BV :
-
Bildverstärker
- DBM :
-
Demineralisierte Knochenmatrix
- DLIF :
-
„Direct lateral interbody fusion“
- EMG :
-
Elektromyographie
- LLIF :
-
„Lateral lumbar interbody fusion“
- LWK :
-
Lendenwirbelkörper
- LWS :
-
Lendenwirbelsäule
- OLIF :
-
Oblique lumbale interkorporelle Fusion
- OPS :
-
Operationen- und Prozedurenschlüssel
- PEEK :
-
Polyetheretherketon
- PLF :
-
Posteriore lumbale Fusion
- PLIF :
-
Posteriore lumbale interkorporelle Fusion
- rhBMP :
-
Rekombinantes humanes BMP
- TLIF :
-
Transforaminale lumbale interkoporelle Fusion
- XLIF :
-
Extrem laterale interkorporelle Fusion
Literatur
Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ (2015) Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg 1:2–18
Martin B, Mirza SK, Spina N, Spiker WR, Lawrence B, Brodke DS (2018) Trends in lumbar fusion procedure rates and associated hospital costs for degenerative spinal diseases in the United States, 2004–2015. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002822
Bertelsmann Stiftung (2016) Faktencheck Rücken, Rückenschmerzbedingte Krankenhausaufenthalte und operative Eingriffe – Mengenentwicklung und regionale Unterschiede. https://www.bertelsmannstiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/Studie_VV_FC_Ruecken_Behandlungsfaelle-Bildgebung.pdf. Zugegriffen: 11. Nov. 2018
de Kunder SL, Rijkers K, Caelers IJMH, de Bie RA, Koehler PJ, van Santbrink H (2018) Lumbar interbody fusion: a historical overview and a future perspective. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:1161–1168
Dimar JR 2nd, Glassman SD, Burkus JK, Pryor PW, Hardacker JW, Carreon LY (2009) Clinical and radiographic analysis of an optimized rhBMP-2 formulation as an autograft replacement in posterolateral lumbar spine arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1377–1386
Viglione LL, Chamoli U, Diwan AD (2017) Evaluating outcomes of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review. World Neurosurg 104:259–271
Seaman S, Kerezoudis P, Bydon M, Torner JC, Hitchon PW (2017) Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: meta-analysis and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci 44:23–29
Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group (2002) Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:1131–1141
Briggs H, Milligan P (1944) Chip fusion of the low back following exploration of the spinal canal. J Bone Joint Surg 26:125–130
de Kunder SL, van Kuijk SMJ, Rijkers K, Caelers IJMH, van Hemert WLW, de Bie RA, van Santbrink H (2017) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J 17:1712–1721
Teng I, Han J, Phan K, Mobbs R (2017) A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF. J Clin Neurosci 44:11–17
Zhou ZJ, Zhao FD, Fang XQ, Zhao X, Fan SW (2011) Meta-analysis of instrumented posterior interbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion in the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 15:295–310
Harms J, Rolinger H (1982) Die operative Therapie der Spondylolisthese durch dorsale Aufrichtung und ventrale Verblockung. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 120:343–347
Yan D‑L, Pei F‑X, Li J, Soo C‑L (2008) Comparative study of PILF and TLIF treatment in adult degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 17(10):1311–1316
Tatsumi R, Lee YP, Khajavi K, Taylor W, Chen F, Bae H (2015) In vitro comparison of endplate preparation between four mini-open interbody fusion approaches. Eur Spine J 24(Suppl 3):372–377
Khan NR, Clark AJ, Lee SL, Venable GT, Rossi NB, Foley KT (2015) Surgical outcomes for minimally invasive vs open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 77:847–874
Capener N (1932) Spondylolisthesis. Br J Surg 19:374–386
Mayer HM (1997) A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:691–699
Bateman DK, Millhouse PW, Shahi N, Kadam AB, Maltenfort MG, Koerner JD, Vaccaro AR (2015) Anterior lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of associated complications. Spine J 15:1118–1132
Giang G, Mobbs R, Phan S, Tran TM, Phan K (2017) Evaluating outcomes of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review. World Neurosurg 104:259–271
Mehren C, Mayer HM, Zandanell C, Siepe CJ, Korge A (2016) The oblique anterolateral approach to the lumbar spine provides access to the lumbar spine with few early complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:2020–2027
Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Millhouse PW, Fleischman AN, Maltenfort MG, Bateman DK, Vaccaro AR (2016) L5/S1 fusion rates in degenerative spine surgery: a systematic review comparing ALIF, TLIF, and axial interbody arthrodesis. Clin Spine Surg 29:150–155
Phan K, Thayaparan GK, Mobbs RJ (2015) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion—systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Neurosurg 29:705–711
Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ (2015) Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg 1:2–18
Bertagnoli R, Vazquez RJ (2003) The AnteroLateral transPsoatic Approach (ALPA): a new technique for implanting prosthetic disc-nucleus devices. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:398–404
Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435–443
Joseph JR, Smith BW, La Marca F, Park P (2015) Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 39:E4
Xu DS, Walker CT, Godzik J, Turner JD, Smith W, Uribe JS (2018) Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review. Ann Transl Med 6:104
Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Patterson J (2011) Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:26–32
Berjano P, Langella F, Damilano M et al (2015) Fusion rate following extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 24(Suppl 3):369–371
Oliveira L, Marchi L, Coutinho E et al (2010) A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:S331–S337
Dimitriou R, Mataliotakis GI, Angoules AG, Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV (2011) Complications following autologous bone graft harvesting from the iliac crest and using the RIA: a systematic review. Injury 42(Suppl 2):S3–S15
Schwartz CE, Martha JF, Kowalski P, Wang DA, Bode R, Li L, Kim DH (2009) Prospective evaluation of chronic pain associated with posterior autologous iliac crest bone graft harvest and its effect on postoperative outcome. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7:49
Kim DH, Rhim R, Li L, Martha J, Swaim BH, Banco RJ, Jenis LG, Tromanhauser SG (2009) Prospective study of iliac crest bone graft harvest site pain and morbidity. Spine J 9:886–892
Ito Z, Imagama S, Kanemura T, Hachiya Y, Miura Y, Kamiya M, Yukawa Y, Sakai Y, Katayama Y, Wakao N, Matsuyama Y, Ishiguro N (2013) Bone union rate with autologous iliac bone versus local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): a multicenter study. Eur Spine J 22:1158–1163
Liao Z, Wang CH, Cui WL (2016) Comparison of allograft and autograft in lumbar fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review. J Invest Surg 29:373–382
Tilkeridis K, Touzopoulos P, Ververidis A, Christodoulou S, Kazakos K, Drosos GI (2014) Use of demineralized bone matrix in spinal fusion. World J Orthop 5:30–37
Vaccaro AR, Chiba K, Heller JG, Patel TC, Thalgott JS, Truumees E, Fischgrund JS, Craig MR, Berta SC, Wang JC, North American Spine Society for Contemporary Concepts in Spine Care (2002) Bone grafting alternatives in spinal surgery. Spine J 2:206–215
Galimberti F, Lubelski D, Healy AT, Wang T, Abdullah KG, Nowacki AS, Benzel EC, Mroz TE (2015) A systematic review of lumbar fusion rates with and without the use of rhBMP-2. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:1132–1139
Burkus JK, Gornet MF, Schuler TC, Kleeman TJ, Zdeblick TA (2009) Six-year outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis with use of interbody fusion cages and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(5):1181–1189
Benglis D, Wang MY, Levi AD (2008) A comprehensive review of the safety profile of bone morphogenetic protein in spine surgery. Neurosurgery 62(5 Suppl 2):ONS423–ONS431
Miyazaki M, Tsumura H, Wang JC, Alanay A (2009) An update on bone substitutes for spinal fusion. Eur Spine J 18:783–799
Buser Z, Brodke DS, Youssef JA, Meisel HJ, Myhre SL, Hashimoto R, Park JB, Yoon TS, Wang JC (2016) Synthetic bone graft versus autograft or allograft for spinal fusion: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine 25:509–516
Lechner R, Putzer D, Liebensteiner M, Bach C, Thaler M (2017) Fusion rate and clinical outcome in anterior lumbar interbody fusion with beta-tricalcium phosphate and bone marrow aspirate as a bone graft substitute. A prospective clinical study in fifty patients. Int Orthop 41:333–339
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
K. J. Schnake, D. Rappert, B. Storzer, S. Schreyer, F. Hilber und C. Mehren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schnake, K.J., Rappert, D., Storzer, B. et al. Lumbale Spondylodese – Indikationen und Techniken. Orthopäde 48, 50–58 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-018-03670-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-018-03670-w
Schlüsselwörter
- Lendenwirbelsäule
- Chirurgische Technik
- Literaturübersicht
- Wirbelsäule
- Spondylodese
- Interkorporelle Fusion