Skip to main content
Log in

Osteoporosebedingte Wirbelkörperfrakturen

Kyphoplastie und Vertebroplastie vs. konservative Therapie

Vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis

Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty vs conservative treatment

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Zusammenfassung

Wirbelkörperkompressionsfrakturen stellen eine der häufigsten Manifestationsformen der Osteoporose dar. Die konservative Therapie umfasst neben einer adäquaten Schmerztherapie v. a. die Sekundärprophylaxe zur Senkung des Risikos weiterer osteoporosebedingter Frakturen. Neben einer medikamentösen Osteoporosetherapie beinhaltet dies individuell auch Krankengymnastik und Orthesen. In vielen Fällen führen osteoporosebedingte Wirbelkörperkompressionsfrakturen jedoch zu anhaltenden Schmerzen und Einschränkungen in der Aktivität und Lebensqualität. In diesen Fällen können Kyphoplastie und Vertebroplastie effektive Behandlungsoptionen darstellen.

Bei der Vertebroplastie wird minimal-invasiv unter Durchleuchtungskontrolle eine innere Stabilisierung des Wirbelkörpers durch Auffüllen mit Knochenzement durchgeführt, welches meistens zu einer schnellen Schmerzreduktion führt. Bei der Kyphoplastie erfolgt zusätzlich eine Reposition des Wirbelkörpers mittels Ballonkatheter, um so zumindest teilweise das sagittale Profil der Wirbelsäule wiederherzustellen. Für beide Verfahren besteht eine umfangreiche klinische Erfahrung. Für die Kyphoplastie wurde in einer größeren kontrollierten randomisierten Studie eine signifikante Schmerzreduktion und Verbesserung der Lebensqualität nachgewiesen. Komplikationen sind selten, Zementaustritte aus dem Wirbelkörper können jedoch zu schwerwiegenden Komplikationen wie Lungenembolien und Nervenschäden führen.

Abstract

Vertebral compression fractures are among the most common forms of manifestations of osteoporosis. Conservative treatment comprises adequate analgesia, osteoporosis medication and individualized physiotherapy or braces. Nevertheless, vertebral compression fractures frequently lead to persisting pain and decrease daily activity and quality of life. In these cases, kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty can be efficient treatment options.

Vertebroplasty is a minimally invasive procedure, in which bone cement is filled into the vertebral body under fluoroscopic control. In most cases, this internal stabilization leads to a rapid reduction in pain. Kyphoplasty additionally aims to correct the kyphotic deformation of the broken vertebra via introducing and inflating a balloon catheter. There is broad clinical experience with both procedures. For kyphoplasty, randomized controlled trials showed significant improvements in pain and quality of life in patients undergoing kyphoplasty. However, cement leakages lead to rare but severe complications such as pulmonary embolism and nerve palsies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. DVO (ed) (2006) Osteoporose Leitlinie. Prophylaxe, Diagnostik und Therapie – bei Frauen ab der Menopause, bei Männern ab dem 60. Lebensjahr. Schattauer, Stuttgart

  2. Anonymous (2002) Incidence of vertebral fracture in europe: results from the European prospective osteoporosis study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res 17:716–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Fenton DC et al (2001) An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used in the treatment of compression fracture. Spine 26:151–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR et al (2008) Efficacy and safety of vertebroplasty for treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Hl, Wong CS, Ho ST et al (2002) A lethal pulmonary embolism during percutaneous vertebroplasty. Anesth Analg 95:1060–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiras J, Sola-Martinez MT, Weill A et al (1995) Percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rev Med Interne 16:854–859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cortet B, Solau-Gervais E, Labbe P et al (1995) Osteoporotic vertebral crush fractures with severe neurologic manifestations. Apropos of 6 cases. Rev Med Interne 16:891–896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Negri P, Tirri T, Paternoster G et al (2007) Treatment of painful osteoporotic or traumatic vertebral compression fractures by percutaneous vertebral augmentation procedures: a nonrandomized comparison between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Clin J Pain 23:425–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Demir SO, Akin C, Aras M et al (2007) Spinal cord injury associated with thoracic osteoporotic fracture. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 86:242–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Felder-Puig R, Piso B, Guba B et al (2009) Kyphoplastie und Vertebroplastie bei osteoporotischen Wirbelkorperkompressionsfrakturen: Systematischer Review. Orthopade, doi 10.1007/s00132-009-1446-2

  11. Frankel BM, Monroe T, Wang C (2007) Percutaneous vertebral augmentation: an elevation in adjacent-level fracture risk in kyphoplasty as compared with vertebroplasty. Spine J 7:575–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Furderer S, Anders M, Schwindling B et al (2002) Vertebral body stenting. Eine Methode zur Reposition und Augmentation von Wirbelkorperkompressionsfrakturen. Orthopäde 31:356–361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P et al (1987) Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie 33:166–168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grohs JG, Matzner M, Trieb K et al (2005) Minimal invasive stabilization of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a prospective nonrandomized comparison of vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:238–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haussler B, Gothe H, Gol D et al (2007) Epidemiology, treatment and costs of osteoporosis in germany – the bone EVA study. Osteoporos Int 18:77–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A et al (2004) Fracture risk following an osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:175–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kasperk C, Hillmeier J, Noldge G et al (2005) Treatment of painful vertebral fractures by kyphoplasty in patients with primary osteoporosis: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study. J Bone Miner Res 20:604–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kasperk C, Noldge G, Meeder P et al (2008) Kyphoplasty: method for minimally invasive treatment of painful vertebral fractures. Chirurg 79:944–952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Klazen C, Verhaar H, Lampmann L et al (2007) VERTOS II: Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials 8:33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Krueger A, Bliemel C, Zettl R et al (2009) Management of pulmonary cement embolism after percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 16:2118

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee BJ, Lee SR, Yoo TY (2002) Paraplegia as a complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate: a case report. Spine 27:419–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lieberman IH, Dudeney S, Reinhardt MK et al (2001) Initial outcome and efficacy of „kyphoplasty“ in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 26:1631–1638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD et al (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3:184–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Müller CW, Krettek C (2009) Vertebroplastie und Kyphoplastie bei osteoporotischen Wirbelkörperfrakturen: Indikationen, Technik, Ergebnisse und Komplikationen. OP-Journal 25:28–32

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nguyen HV, Ludwig S, Gelb D (2003) Osteoporotic vertebral burst fractures with neurologic compromise. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:10–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pflugmacher R, Kandziora F, Schroder R et al (2005) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in osteoporotic fractures of vertebral bodies – a prospective 1-year follow-up analysis. Rofo 177:1670–1676

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Prather H, Watson JO, Gilula LA (2007) Nonoperative management of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Injury 38(Suppl 3):40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Suzuki N, Ogikubo O, Hansson T (2008) The course of the acute vertebral body fragility fracture: its effect on pain, disability and quality of life during 12 months. Eur Spine J 17(10):1380–1390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor RS, Fritzell P, Taylor RJ (2007) Balloon kyphoplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 16:1085–1100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Taylor RS, Taylor RJ, Fritzell P (2006) Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures: a comparative systematic review of efficacy and safety. Spine 31:2747–2755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Voormolen MH, Mali WP, Lohle PN et al (2007) Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared with optimal pain medication treatment: short-term clinical outcome of patients with subacute or chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The VERTOS study. AJNR 28:555–560

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wardlaw D, Cummings Sr, Van Meirhaeghe J et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 373:1016–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Weber M, Uehlinger K, Gerber H (2002) Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture causing neurologic deficit. J Clin Rheumatol 8:166–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor weist auf folgende Beziehung/en hin: Dr. Müller hat von der Fa. Medtronic Referentenhonorare erhalten. Trotz des möglichen Interessenkonflikts ist der Beitrag unabhängig und produktneutral.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C.W. Müller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, C., Gösling, T., Mameghani, A. et al. Osteoporosebedingte Wirbelkörperfrakturen. Orthopäde 39, 417–424 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-009-1576-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-009-1576-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation