Skip to main content
Log in

Der zementfreie Oberflächenersatz des Humeruskopfes bei Patienten unter 55 Jahren

Cementless humeral surface replacement arthroplasty in patients less than 55 years of age

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Ziel dieser prospektiven Studie war die Analyse der Ergebnisse des zementfreien Oberflächenersatz des Oberarmkopfes an verschiedenen Pathologien des Schultergelenkes bei Patienten <55 Jahren.

Patienten und Methoden

Vor und im Mittel 2,5 (1–6) Jahre nach der Operation wurden 23 Patienten (26 Implantate) mit Oberflächenersatzprothesen des Oberarmkopfes untersucht. Zehn Patienten wurden aufgrund einer posttraumatischen Omarthrose und 7 Patienten aufgrund einer primären Omarthrose versorgt. Bei 6 Patienten lag eine Oberarmkopfnekrose vor. Neben dem Constant-Score wurde die Beweglichkeit und die Patientenzufriedenheit evaluiert.

Ergebnisse

Der mittlere Constant-Score des Gesamtkollektivs konnte signifikant von 33 (8–69) Punkten präoperativ auf 61 (25–83) Punkte postoperativ angehoben werden (p<0,0001). Der alters- und geschlechtsadaptierte Constant-Score verbesserte sich im Mittel von 38% (8–86%) auf 70% (28–114%; p<0,0001). Signifikante Verbesserungen prä- vs. postoperativ wurden für das Gesamtkollektiv für den Schmerz, die Aktivität, die Mobilität, Schulter Flexion, Abduktion und Außen-/Innenrotation gefunden (p<0,001). In einem Fall war ein Wechsel in eine Totalendoprothese aufgrund einer Glenoiderosion und in einem Fall eine weichteilige Reoperation aufgrund eines oberflächigen Wundinfekts notwendig.

Schlussfolgerung

Der zementfreie Oberflächenersatz des Oberarmkopfes stellt eine knochensparende endoprothetische Therapieoption im Vergleich zur Humeruskopfprothese für junge Patienten dar. Gute klinische Ergebnisse, eine hohe Patientenzufriedenheit und eine relativ niedrige Komplikationsrate konnten gezeigt werden. Langzeituntersuchungen sind notwendig, um diese Ergebnisse zu bestätigen.

Abstract

Background

Cementless humeral surface replacement arthroplasty is a viable treatment option for degenerative diseases of the shoulder joint. The aim of this prospective study was to analyse the results of this treatment option in patients younger than 55 years of age with different pathologies of the shoulder.

Patients and methods

Twenty-three patients (26 implants) treated with cementless humeral surface replacement arthroplasty were included in this study. Mean follow-up was 2.5 years (1–6 years). Ten patients had posttraumatic osteoarthritis, seven had primary osteoarthritis, and six had osteonecrosis. Patients were evaluated using the Constant score, shoulder motion, and subjective satisfaction.

Results

The mean Constant score increased significantly from 33 points preoperatively (8–69 points) to 61 points postoperatively (25–83 points; p<0.0001), adjusted to age and gender from 38% (8–86%) to 70% (28–114%; p<0.0001). Significant improvement for the whole cohort was found regarding patients’ pain, activity, mobility, shoulder flexion and abduction, and internal and external rotation (p<0.001). In one case, reoperation was necessary due to a superficial wound infection, and in another case, implant revision to a total shoulder replacement was performed because of glenoid erosion.

Conclusion

Cementless humeral surface replacement arthroplasty is a viable bone-preserving treatment option for young and active patients. Later conversion to total shoulder replacement is possible. Good clinical results, a low complication rate, and high patient satisfaction were found in the short and mid term. Long-term investigations are necessary to confirm these observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Bailie DS, Llinas PJ, Ellenbecker TS (2008) Cementless humeral resurfacing arthroplasty in active patients less than fifty-five years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:110–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bishop JY, Flatow EL (2003) Management of glenohumeral arthritis: a role for arthroscopy? Orthop Clin North Am 34:559–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr (2006) Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2279–2292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boileau P, Chuinard C, Le Huec JC et al (2006) Proximal humerus fracture sequelae: impact of a new radiographic classification on arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:121–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boileau P, Sinnerton RJ, Chuinard C, Walch G (2006) Arthroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:562–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bryant D, Litchfield R, Sandow M et al (2005) A comparison of pain, strength, range of motion, and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis of the shoulder. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1947–1956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burroughs PL, Gearen PF, Petty WR, Wright TW (2003) Shoulder arthroplasty in the young patient. J Arthroplasty 18:792–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chapman C, Mattern C, Levine WN (2004) Arthroscopically assisted core decompression of the proximal humerus for avascular necrosis. Arthroscopy 20:1003–1006

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cole BJ, Yanke A, Provencher MT (2007) Nonarthroplasty alternatives for the treatment of glenohumeral arthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Deshmukh AV, Koris M, Zurakowski D, Thornhill TS (2005) Total shoulder arthroplasty: long-term survivorship, functional outcome, and quality of life. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:471–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fink B, Strauss JM, Lamla U et al (2001) Endoprosthetic surface replacement of the head of the humerus. Orthopade 30:379–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haines JF, Trail IA, Nuttall D et al (2006) The results of arthroplasty in osteoarthritis of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:496–501

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayes PR, Flatow EL (2001) Total shoulder arthroplasty in the young patient. Instr Course Lect 50:73–88

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Levy O, Copeland SA (2001) Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder. 5- to 10-year results with the Copeland mark-2 prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:213–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Levy O, Copeland SA (2004) Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty (Copeland CSRA) for osteoarthritis of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:266–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Levy O, Funk L, Sforza G, Copeland SA (2004) Copeland surface replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:512–518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lo IK, Litchfield RB, Griffin S et al (2005) Quality-of-life outcome following hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis. A prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2178–2185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moskowitz RW, Blaine TA (2005) An overview of treatment options for persistent shoulder pain. Am J Orthop 34:10–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Neer CS, Watson KC, Stanton FJ (1982) Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:319–337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Radnay CS, Setter KJ, Chambers L et al (2007) Total shoulder replacement compared with humeral head replacement for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: A systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(Suppl):13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Raiss P, Aldinger PR, Kasten P et al (2007) Humeral head resurfacing for fixed anterior glenohumeral dislocation. Int Orthop 33:451–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Raiss P, Aldinger PR, Kasten P et al (2008) Total shoulder replacement in young and middle-aged patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:764–769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rickert M, Loew M (2007) Hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder replacement in glenohumeral osteoarthritis? Orthopade 36:1013–1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rispoli DM, Sperling JW, Athwal GS et al (2006) Humeral head replacement for the treatment of osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2637–2644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM (1998) Neer hemiarthroplasty and Neer total shoulder arthroplasty in patients fifty years old or less. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:464–473

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM (2004) Minimum fifteen-year follow-up of Neer hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged fifty years or younger. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:604–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sperling JW, Steinmann SP, Cordasco FA et al (2006) Shoulder arthritis in the young adult: arthroscopy to arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 55:67–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Thomas SR, Wilson AJ, Chambler A et al (2005) Outcome of Copeland surface replacement shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:485–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, Khoury A (1999) Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 14:756–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Werner A, Hedtmann A (2007) Surface replacement shoulder: arthroplasty indications and limits. Orthopade 36:996–1001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wirth MA, Tapscott RS, Southworth C, Rockwood CA Jr (2006) Treatment of glenohumeral arthritis with a hemiarthroplasty: a minimum five-year follow-up outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:964–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Wir danken der „Deutschen Arthrose-Hilfe e.V.“ für die Unterstützung bei der Durchführung dieser Studie.

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Raiss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raiss, P., Pape, G., Becker, S. et al. Der zementfreie Oberflächenersatz des Humeruskopfes bei Patienten unter 55 Jahren. Orthopäde 39, 201–208 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-009-1525-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-009-1525-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation