Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die arthroskopische Rekonstruktion der Rotatorenmanschette

Der gegenwärtige Goldstandard?

Arthroscopic reconstruction of the rotator cuff

The current gold standard?

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die arthroskopische Rekonstruktion der Rotatorenmanschette hat sich in den letzten Jahren zum Goldstandard entwickelt und ist heute die bevorzugte Methode zur Rekonstruktion der Rotatorenmanschette weltweit. Entscheidend für ein gutes postoperatives Ergebnis ist neben der Erfahrung des Operateurs und der richtigen arthroskopischen Technik, eine sorgfältige Patientenselektion und ein adäquates postoperatives Management. Werden diese Faktoren berücksichtigt, liegt die Erfolgsrate bei über 90%, basierend sowohl auf objektiven Kriterien als auch der subjektiven Patientenzufriedenheit. Das Ziel dieser Arbeit ist die Vermittlung der Indikationsstellung, der operativen Technik, der Nachbehandlung und der Ergebnisse bei arthroskopischer Rekonstruktion der Rotatorenmanschette.

Abstract

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has become the gold standard, and is now accepted throughout the world as the method of choice, for rotator cuff repair. As well as an experienced surgeon and meticulously correct arthroscopic technique, careful patient selection and adequate postoperative management are of decisive importance if a good postoperative outcome is to be achieved. With due consideration for all these factors the success rate is over 90%, as measured not only with reference to objective criteria, but also by patients’ reports of their how satisfied they are with the result. This paper aims to report the indications, arthroscopic technique and postoperative protocol, and also the results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Anderson K, Boothby M, Aschenbrener D, Holsbeeck M van (2006) Outcome and structural integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using 2 rows of fixation: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34: 1899–1905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Apreleva M, Ozbaydar M, Fitzgibbons PG, Warner JJ (2002) Rotator cuff tears: the effect of the reconstruction method on three-dimensional repair site area. Arthroscopy 18: 519–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bassett RW, Cofield RH (1983) Acute tears of the rotator cuff. The timing of surgical repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 175: 18–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ et al. (2005) Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Joint Surg Am 87: 1229–1240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bokor DJ, Hawkins RJ, Huckell GH et al. (1993) Results of nonoperative management of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop Relat Res 294: 103–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burkhart SS, Nottage WM, Ogilvie-Harris DJ et al. (1994) Partial repair of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 10: 363–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellman H, Kay SP, Wirth M (1993) Arthroscopic treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: 2- to 7-year follow-up study. Arthroscopy 9: 195–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuchs B, Gilbart MK, Hodler J (2006) Clinical and structural results of open repair of an isolated one-tendon tear of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88: 309–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA et al. (2004) The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86: 219–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gartsman GM, Hammerman SM (1997) Full-thickness tears: arthroscopic repair. Orthop Clin North Am 28: 83–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gartsman GM, Khan M, Hammerman SM (1998) Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80: 832–840

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J (2000) The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82: 505–515

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerber C, Meyer DC, Schneeberger AG et al. (2004) Effect of tendon release and delayed repair on the structure of the muscles of the rotator cuff: an experimental study in sheep. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86: 1973–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goodman RS (1996) Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78: 633

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hawkins RH, Dunlop R (1995) Nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321: 178–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Itoi E, Tabata S (1992) Conservative treatment of rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 275: 165–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu SH (1994) Arthroscopically-assisted rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76: 592–595

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J, Puttlitz CM (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88: 403–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Meier SW, Meier JD (2006) The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 22: 1168–1173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Meier SW, Meier JD (2006) Rotator cuff repair: the effect of double-row fixation on three-dimensional repair site. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15: 691–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Melillo AS, Savoie FH 3rd, Field LD (1997) Massive rotator cuff tears: debridement versus repair. Orthop Clin North Am 28: 117–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Milgrom C, Schaffler M, Gilbert S, Holsbeeck M van (1995) Rotator-cuff changes in asymptomatic adults. The effect of age, hand dominance and gender. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77: 296–298

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Millett PJ, Wilcox RB 3rd, O’Holleran JD, Warner JJ (2006) Rehabilitation of the rotator cuff: an evaluation-based approach. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14: 599–609

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Miniaci A, Dowdy PA, Willits KR, Vellet AD (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the rotator cuff tendons in the asymptomatic shoulder. Am J Sports Med 23: 142–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Petersson CJ (1984) Ruptures of the supraspinatus tendon. Cadaver dissection. Acta Orthop Scand 55: 52–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sher JS, Uribe JW, Posada A et al. (1995) Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77: 10–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tauro JC (1998) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: analysis of technique and results at 2- and 3-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 14: 45–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, Zurakowski D, Warner JJ (2003) Pullout strength of suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85: 2190–2198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Warner JJ, Higgins L, Parsons IM, Dowdy P (2001) Diagnosis and treatment of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10: 37–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Warner JJ, Tetreault P, Lehtinen J, Zurakowski D (2005) Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a cohort comparison study. Arthroscopy 21: 328–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Weber SC (1997) Arthroscopic debridement and acromioplasty versus mini-open repair in the management of significant partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. Orthop Clin North Am 28: 79–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yamaguchi K, Tetro AM, Blam O et al. (2001) Natural history of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a longitudinal analysis of asymptomatic tears detected sonographically. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10: 199–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA 02114, Boston, USA

    M. Ozbaydar, S. Chung, D. Diller &  J.J.P. Warner MD

Authors
  1. M. Ozbaydar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Diller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J.J.P. Warner MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.J.P. Warner MD.

Additional information

Übersetzt von: PD Dr. M. Tingart (markus.tingart@klinik.uni-regensburg.de)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ozbaydar, M., Chung, S., Diller, D. et al. Die arthroskopische Rekonstruktion der Rotatorenmanschette. Orthopäde 36, 825–833 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-007-1134-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-007-1134-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation